Out of the movies from Robert Duvall’s filmography, I’ve written about To Kill a Mockingbird (which I liked), The Terry Fox Story (which I also liked), and Network (which I wasn’t a fan of). While looking through his filmography for Taking Up Room’s Robert Duvall Tribute Blogathon, I discovered he starred in the 2003 movie, Gods and Generals. I hadn’t seen this film prior to the event. But because of its association with the Movieguide Awards, I had heard of it before. At the 2004 Movieguide Awards, Stephen Lang won an acting award called the ‘Grace Award for Movies’ for his portrayal of General Stonewall Jackson. Gods and Generals also won the ‘Faith & Freedom Award for Movies’ at the 2004 Movieguide Awards. I wasn’t able to find any information about the other nominees for those aforementioned categories. Therefore, I cannot comment on who should or should not have won. But, through my review, I want to determine if, in my opinion, Gods and Generals deserved to be nominated. Selecting the 2003 film also gave me an excuse to review another title of Robert’s.

Things I liked about the film:

The acting: Since Robert Duvall is the reason why I’m reviewing Gods and Generals, I’ll talk about his acting performance first. In the 2003 movie, Robert portrays General Robert E. Lee. Throughout the movie, I noticed the consistent calmness he brought to his performance. At the beginning of Gods and Generals, General Robert E. Lee turns down an invitation. The tone of voice he adopts is very articulate and matter of fact. There’s a gentleness in his eyes that shows he holds no ill-feelings or disrespect toward receiving the invitation in the first place. Robert’s approach to portraying General Robert E. Lee appeared to have genuine thought and effort put into it. Meanwhile, I liked Jeff Daniels’ portrayal of Lieutenant Colonel Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain! Jeff brought a tenderness that made Lieutenant Colonel Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain interesting to watch. One of the most captivating scenes in Gods and Generals is when Lieutenant Colonel Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain and his wife, Fanny, discuss his upcoming departure to the United States Army. Their interaction is very bittersweet, yet tender. Their gentle tone of voice holds the love they share for each other. Both Fanny (portrayed by Mira Sorvino) and Lieutenant Colonel Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain carry sadness on their faces, especially in their eyes, unsure what their future will hold. Jeff’s and Mira’s acting abilities effectively sold the believability of Lieutenant Colonel Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain and Fanny’s relationship!

I brought up in this review’s introduction how, at the 2004 Movieguide Awards, Stephen Lang won an acting award called the ‘Grace Award for Movies’ for his portrayal of General Stonewall Jackson. Now that I’ve seen his performance for myself, I can, honestly, say his nomination was well deserved! Stephen brought versatility to his portrayal of General Stonewall Jackson, allowing his performance to be well-rounded. Because of Stephen’s acting talents, scenes he (as General Stonewall Jackson) appeared in were emotionally effective. A great example is when General Stonewall Jackson and his wife, Anna, read the Bible together before he leaves for the Battle of Manassas. The gentle, yet loving tone of voice from both General Stonewall Jackson and Anna (portrayed by Kali Rocha) showed how seriously they took their relationship. The look in their eyes was that of longing, longing for more time together as well as longing to be loved by each other. Anna and General Stonewall Jackson’s interaction in that scene showcased a moment of tenderness, reflection, and true love. This was achieved because of the strength of Stephen’s and Kali’s acting abilities!

Historical accuracy: What can ultimately make or break a historical movie is its historical accuracy. If the creative team behind a historical film effectively executes that production’s historical accuracy, the film in question can present the illusion of immersion. This illusion was achieved in Gods and Generals! From the set design to the costume design and even the finest of details, everything looked and felt like the Civil War era. I was impressed how simple items, like a doll or a piano, appeared to have come straight out of that time-period. Other elements, like the dialect, helped bring authenticity to the production. Looking back on Gods and Generals, the creative team’s research into the Civil War era is very evident!

How long shots were utilized: Long shots can be incorporated into a film for a variety of reasons. In “sword & sandal” films, long shots capture the scope of larger set designs. Films featuring armies, teams, or crowds will showcase the size of those groups through long shots. In Gods and Generals, however, long shots were utilized to present establishing shots (shots that establish a story’s location). One example is when Fredericksburg, Virginia is introduced in the story. The long shot used captured an aerial view of the town. Through this perspective, hues of black, white, green, blue, brown, and even purple appeared to nicely blend together. How the town was shown on screen looked like a watercolor painting! Presenting places like Fredericksburg, Virginia with a long shot helped add visually appealing images to Gods and Generals.

What I didn’t like about the film:

The run-time: IMDB lists Gods and Generals’s run-time as a little over three-and-a-half-hours. After seeing the movie, however, I felt like I spent three and a half years watching it. I recognize depicting a historical event through film takes time, whether it be battles or certain individuals interacting with one another. For a historical story like Gods and Generals, there are a lot of moving parts involved. But some scenes in the 2003 film were either drawn out too long or seemed unnecessary. One example is a scene where a soldier (who also happened to be a background character) explained to his fellow soldiers what they should do with his belongings if he dies on the battlefield. Personally, I think Gods and Generals should have been presented as a mini-series. Therefore, the story’s key individuals and events would have received their due diligence.

A dialogue-heavy film: In any movie, including historical pictures, dialogue plays an important role in storytelling. Through dialogue, ideas are expressed, emotions are shared, and characters give pieces of their heart to each other and the audience. But if a movie is dialogue-heavy, it forces the audience to actively pay attention to what they’re watching or else they’ll miss important context. Gods and Generals is a dialogue-heavy film, featuring long stretches of time where characters engage in conversations with one another. What also works against Gods and Generals is its little over three-and-a-half-hour run-time I already brought up in this review. While there were battles and action-heavy scenes throughout the movie, they were far and few between compared to the dialogue-heavy scenes. Having an ebb and flow of action and dialogue-heavy scenes would have maintained a steadier pace.

Underutilizing Robert Duvall and Jeff Daniels: Robert Duvall’s involvement in Gods and Generals is the reason why I wanted to review the film. As I mentioned earlier in this review, I liked Jeff Daniels’ portrayal of Lieutenant Colonel Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain. But compared to Stephen Lang and his portrayal of General Stonewall Jackson, it seemed like the acting talents of Jeff and Robert were utilized sparingly. In fact, it got to the point where the movie became ‘The General Stonewall Jackson Show’, with everyone else simply participating in it. Listing Robert, Stephen, and Jeff as Gods and Generals’s top-billed actors feels a bit misleading because of Jeff’s and Robert’s underutilization. This decision also does Robert’s and Jeff’s acting talents a disservice.

My overall impression:

The way I feel about Gods and Generals is similar to how I feel about the 1994 film, Scarlett. Both projects were competently made, each respective creative team clearly knowing what they were doing. The acting and historical accuracy were the strengths of each movie. But the screenwriting causes Scarlett and Gods and Generals to be a mixed bag. The 2003 film having a run-time of a little over three-and-a-half-hours is, in my opinion, excessive. Not only is Gods and Generals a dialogue-heavy movie, I also felt Robert Duvall’s and Jeff Daniels’ acting talents were underutilized. But what I will say is, for me, Stephen Lang stole the show! His performance was so solid, his Movieguide Awards nomination was well deserved. I’d honestly recommend just watching his scenes because the versatility Stephen brought to his portrayal of General Stonewall Jackson made his performance worth watching the film.

Overall score: 6 out of 10

Have you seen Gods and Generals? Which movie from Robert Duvall’s filmography would you like to see me review next? Let me know in the comment section below!

Have fun at the movies!

Sally Silverscreen