Last November, I wrote an editorial speculating how Stranger Things could (and should) have ended. In this editorial, I proposed an ending where Eddie Munson created the entire show in his imagination, similar to the series finale of St. Elsewhere. I also confessed wanting to see this proposed ending because I was tired of seeing characters not reaching their full potential. No, I did not get the ending I wanted. But I always knew there was a one in a million chance I’d receive that ending. What I’m more disappointed about is how Eddie Munson’s second chance to reach his full potential was taken away from him.
This picture of Eddie is one of the most iconic photos not just in Stranger Things history, but in television history as well. Original image created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures
As I’ve mentioned in the past, Eddie Munson has not only become a very beloved character, but also a very marketable character since his debut on Stranger Things back in 2022. In fact, Eddie subverted the expectations of the show’s creative team, as (from what I’ve heard) he was never intended to survive past one season. But instead of showing appreciation to the fans for helping Eddie become so popular, and even showing appreciation to Eddie himself, the creative team behind Stranger Things took them for granted. From my perspective, it seems like the show’s creative team grew to resent the fact Eddie became more liked than some of the main characters on the show. Based on what I saw and heard from Stranger Things’ fifth and final season, this perceived resentment was woven into the story. When Robin quoted Eddie by saying “Bad news first. Always.”, she didn’t even say Eddie’s name. Later in the season, Steve argues with Dustin how, back in Stranger Things’ fourth season, Eddie “saved no one” and “made a dumb call” by sacrificing his life in the Upside Down. But Steve so easily forgot how a) Eddie put the well-being and safety of others, including Steve, before himself, b) Eddie let Steve borrow his denim vest when Steve didn’t have a shirt to wear and c) Eddie encouraged Steve to work out his issues with Nancy so they could happy together. Even though Steve ended up apologizing to Dustin and admitted how Eddie saved his life, his apology had less to do with being grateful to Eddie and more to do with not losing Dustin.
Though Eddie’s ‘Master of Puppets’ solo was a very exciting scene, Eddie’s intention was to distract the Demobats in order to protect his friends. Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures
When Eddie shares his aspirations to graduate high school in Stranger Things’ fourth season, he told the Hellfire Club how “I’m gonna walk that stage next month. I’m gonna look Principal Higgins dead in the eye, I’m gonna flip him the bird, I’m gonna snatch that diploma, and I’m gonna run like hell outta here”. Had the creative team brought Eddie back in the fifth and final season of Stranger Things, he could have received a second chance to achieve the one thing his heart desired. But instead of letting Eddie reach his full potential and even get his “standing ovation”, Eddie’s graduation moment was given to Dustin (a main character) when he graduated high school. I’ve heard this was intended to be a tribute to Eddie. But to me, it felt like Eddie’s potential was stolen from him in favor of preventing main characters from becoming overshadowed.
While Eddie shares his plans to graduate high school, he shows self-awareness for why he hasn’t graduated sooner. Original image created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures
Throughout January and late 2025, I’ve heard and seen a lot of discourse over how Stranger Things ended. But I haven’t specifically heard from an Eddie Munson fan’s perspective on how the show turned out. This is why I wrote this opinion piece in the first place. While I don’t watch Stranger Things, I did pay attention to the show’s last season, as I was curious to see if Eddie would come back and if so, how. But looking back at everything that happened (or didn’t happen, in Eddie’s case), the term, “this could have been an email” comes to mind. Since email wasn’t a thing in the 1980s, the last season of Stranger Things could have been a school assembly. Though I’d like to think a school assembly about Eddie would have more thought and care put into it, especially if it was hosted by his fans. The creative team behind Stranger Things failed Eddie Munson. But as one of his fans, I refuse to make that mistake. I will give Eddie the love, support, dignity, and respect those that created him should have been giving him all along. I will continue to advocate for characters to receive their full potential, no matter their status. And I will always try to give those who are under-rated their “standing ovations”.
I’ve mentioned in the past how my favorite character from Freaks and Geeks is Harris Trinsky. To show my gratitude to one of the people responsible for bringing this character to life, Stephen Lea Sheppard (the actor who portrayed Harris), I decided to review one of the projects from Stephen’s filmography on his birthday. When I looked at his official page on IMDB, I discovered Stephen has only one movie on his filmography. That film is 2001’s The Royal Tenenbaums. While I have heard of this movie, I had never seen it before. Stephen’s birthday was the perfect opportunity to, once again, expand my cinematic horizons! Two years ago, I published a list of the Top 10 “Icks” from Hallmark Hall of Fame Movies. In that list, I discuss how Saint Maybe did a better job than Back When We Were Grownups at showcasing a dysfunctional family. When I learned The Royal Tenenbaums revolved around a dysfunctional family, I wondered if the film would remind me more of Back When We Were Grownups or Saint Maybe. Now that I’ve seen the 2001 movie, I can find the answer to that question in this review!
The Royal Tenebaums poster created by Touchstone Pictures, American Empirical Pictures, Scott Rudin Productions, and Vantage Media, and Buena Vista Pictures Distribution
Things I liked about the film:
Dudley’s bluntness as comic relief: In The Royal Tenenbaums, Stephen portrays Dudley Heisenbergen. Throughout the story, Dudley resides with Bill Murray’s character, Raleigh St. Clair, because he is researching Dudley’s medical condition. Though he receives a very limited amount of screen-time, as well as lines within the script, Dudley left a memorable impression on me. That’s because his bluntness was effectively utilized as comic relief. One example is when Raleigh discusses Dudley’s medical condition through a tape recorder. Raleigh addresses how Dudley has Color Blindness, yet marvels at Dudley’s exceptional hearing. In the very next scene, while Dudley is in another room, Dudley asks Raleigh if he is Color Blind, with Raleigh confirming this fact. Why I found this exchange hilarious is how Dudley’s bluntness felt reminiscent of Stephen’s portrayal of Harris on Freaks and Geeks, as Harris’ brutal honesty sometimes led to humorous moments. I wish Dudley’s bluntness was incorporated more in The Royal Tenenbaums.
Use of mixed media: Before watching The Royal Tenenbaums, I knew the movie had an offbeat and quirky presentation. But because I hadn’t seen the movie before, I didn’t give much thought to why it was presented this way. Now that I’ve seen The Royal Tenenbaums, I know what gave the 2001 film its unique identity was the creative team’s use of mixed media. The entire story is told as if the audience is reading a book, complete with parts of the film being separated by “chapters”. If a character wrote a book, a cover of their book was presented on screen to emphasize that character’s progress and/or success. When Richie and his father, Royal, talk about a disastrous tennis match, the tennis match is shown in the movie as a television broadcast, which provided additional context to what Royal and Richie were saying. Details like the ones I described show how The Royal Tenenbaums’ creative team creatively and cleverly told their story!
Brutal honesty about family dysfunction: I brought up in the introduction of this review how Saint Maybe did a better job than Back When We Were Grownups at showcasing a dysfunctional family. This is because there was a very clear reason for the family in Saint Maybe to be dysfunctional, as a death in the family caused a ripple effect which led to the family’s dysfunctionality. The Tenenbaum family’s dysfunctional nature felt reminiscent of the 1998 Hallmark Hall of Fame presentation. But in the case of The Royal Tenenbaums, the Tenenbaum’s dysfunction was caused by a series of little things that culminated over time. A great example is when Margot debuted a play she created on her 11th birthday. When Margot asks her dad, Royal, what he thought of her play, Royal honestly tells his daughter the play didn’t feel believable because it seemed like a child wrote it. Prior to that moment, Margot had been praised as a playwright protégé, so her father’s criticism affected her in the long run. Scenes like the one I described showcase the brutal honesty of what can lead families to become dysfunctional. The acting performances and screenwriting made this dysfunctionality feel realistic.
Margot and Richie’s romantic attraction for each other: As the story of The Royal Tenenbaums carries on, the script reveals Margot and Richie have developed romantic feelings for each other. These feelings come years after Richie and Margot grew up together as brother and sister. However, Margot was adopted into the Tenenbaum family, so she and Richie are only related by familial connection. But despite this fact, Margot and Richie’s romantic attraction creates an awkwardness that can’t be overlooked. Plus, this attraction has little bearing over the plot. It would have made more sense if Richie and Margot’s subplot had instead revolved around helping their friend, Eli, overcome his addiction, especially since Eli grew up infatuated with the Tenenbaum family.
Endings wrapping up too neatly: Earlier in this review, I talked about the brutal honesty about family dysfunction in The Royal Tenenbaums. The script’s brutal honesty brought a sense of realism to the family dysfunction, even addressing issues family dysfunction can cause, like addiction and self-harm. But by the end of the movie, all of the stories are wrapped up in neat little packages, giving the characters a semblance of a “happily ever after”. It seems like The Royal Tenenbaums’ creative team wanted to have their cake and eat it too. What I mean by this is they didn’t want to sugarcoat family dysfunction, yet, at the same time, they wanted to make sure all the characters were ok. One solution to this flaw is showing the characters gradually working through their dysfunction as the story goes on. This way, the “happily ever afters” would have felt more earned and complimentary to the story’s realism.
Dudley’s unclear connection: When I discussed Dudley’s bluntness as comic relief in The Royal Tenenbaums, I brought up how Dudley resides with Bill Murray’s character, Raleigh St. Clair, because he is researching Dudley’s medical condition. But other than this fact, the script never provides a clear explanation how Dudley connects to the other characters. Did Raleigh and Margot adopt Dudley? Does Dudley’s parents allow him to spend time with Raleigh whenever he feels like it? Are Raleigh or Margot Dudley’s legal guardian? This lack of explanation left me confused, especially since the connections between the other characters in The Royal Tenenbaums were made clearer.
Since I’m reviewing The Royal Tenenbaums in honor of Stephen Lea Sheppard’s birthday, I decided to include this photo of Shephen’s character, Dudley, and Bill’s character, Raleigh. Photo created by Touchstone Pictures, American Empirical Pictures, Scott Rudin Productions, Vantage Media, and Buena Vista Pictures Distribution
My overall impression:
The 1998 Hallmark Hall of Fame movie, Saint Maybe, proves stories about family dysfunction can work. What helped Saint Maybe was not only providing a clear reason for the family’s dysfunction, but also showing the family using their dysfunction as motivation to make impactful changes in their lives. Like the 1998 film, The Royal Tenenbaums gives the audience reasons to explain why the titular family is dysfunctional. However, the impactful changes in the Tenenbaum family’s lives don’t happen until toward the end of the film. In my opinion, these changes should have been more gradual throughout the story. What I can appreciate about The Royal Tenenbaums is the brutally honest approach to the subject of family dysfunctionality. A sense of realism was brought to the story because of this creative decision. But as I stated in the introduction of this review, Stephen Lea Sheppard is the reason I sought out The Royal Tenenbaums. His character’s bluntness left a memorable impression on me and even reminded me a bit of Harris Trinsky. So, if you’re reading this, Stephen, I just want to say Happy Birthday and thank you for making Harris Trinsky a sparkling, shooting star in our landscape known as entertainment.
Overall score: 7 out of 10
Have you seen The Royal Tenenbaums? What stories about family dysfunction do you think work in film? Please tell me in the comment section!
January’s theme for Genre Grandeur seems fitting; “Movies That Celebrate a New Year”. When I learned this was the theme of this edition of Genre Grandeur, I was excited because I don’t often receive an opportunity to review New Year’s themed films. As I was looking for a movie to select, I learned the protagonists in 1957’sAn Affair to Remember meet on New Year’s Eve. With this piece of information in mind and because An Affair to Remember was recommended by Maddy (from Maddy Loves Her Classic Films) as well as Emily (from The Flapper Dame), I found the perfect time to check out the 1957 picture! Out of all the actresses I’ve talked about on 18 Cinema Lane, Deborah Kerr is the one I’ve discussed the most. As of early 2026, I have reviewed ten of her films, with An Affair to Remember now being the eleventh film. But some of these pictures have been better than others. How will An Affair to Remember stand against the aforementioned ten titles? Check out my review to find out!
An Affair to Remember(1957) poster created by Jerry Wald Productions and Twentieth Century Fox
Things I liked about the film:
The on-screen chemistry: In a movie like An Affair to Remember, where the story heavily revolves around one romantic relationship, it’s important to cast an actor and actress who possess such strong on-screen chemistry. This element of their combined performance will help them sell the believability of their characters’ relationship to the audience. As soon as their characters, Terry and Nickie, first meet in An Affair to Remember, I could immediately sense the strong on-screen chemistry between Deborah Kerr and Cary Grant! The fluidity of their acting abilities allowed them to compliment each other’s performance. Clever, witty banter also worked in their favor because of how it was written and delivered. Because of the combination of acting, screenwriting, and on-screen chemistry, Cary and Deborah helped create a couple that was captivating to watch!
The dialogue: When a film’s screenwriting is good, the dialogue of the characters can sound realistic. But if the screenwriting is thoughtfully and carefully curated, like in An Affair to Remember, the characters are allowed to say what’s on their minds and hearts in eloquent and even profound ways. As Nickie and Terry visit Nickie’s grandmother, Janou, Terry confesses how she’d like to stay in Janou’s garden forever. Janou then responds by telling Terry, “It [the garden] is a good place to sit and remember, but you have still to create your memories”. By Janou saying this to Terry, she is kindly yet artfully encouraging Terry to create her own space of reflection and tranquility. Later in the movie, when Terry and Nickie are creating their plan to reunite in six months, they agree to meet at the Empire State Building. Terry explains how “It’s the nearest thing to heaven we have in New York”. While I’ve always known the Empire State Building held great importance within New York City, I’ve never heard it described the way Terry described it before. Because the dialogue in An Affair to Remember received such quality screenwriting, I was given the opportunity to see an iconic landmark in a completely new way!
Janou’s garden: As I talked about the dialogue in An Affair to Remember, I brought up how Terry wants to stay in Janou’s garden forever. Reflecting on this part of the set design, I can understand why Terry would fall in love with this space! The enclosed garden prominently displays a large tree with green leaves and red flowers. Bright hues of other flowers burst within the garden. A small circular pond greets visitors, with yellow and white flowers floating over the tranquil water. There’s even a connected chapel both Terry and Nickie retreat to. Though Janou’s garden was shown in An Affair to Remember for only a limited number of scenes, it left a memorable impression!
New Year’s Eve’s limited incorporation: I said in the introduction of this review how Terry and Nickie meeting on New Year’s Eve is one of the reasons why I selected An Affair to Remember for this month’s Genre Grandeur. Based on that aforementioned detail, I believed the holiday would play a bigger role in the story. But when I watched the 1957 movie, I discovered New Year’s Eve is actually an afterthought. If it wasn’t for the passengers on the SS Constitution singing “Auld Lang Syne”, I wouldn’t have known Nickie and Terry’s cruise was taking place around New Year’s Eve. Had the SS Constitution’s passengers participated in counting down to midnight or some of the characters talked about their New Year’s resolutions, it would have better established when the story was taking place.
Scenes that feel like padding: IMDB lists An Affair to Remember’s run-time as one hour and fifty-five minutes. However, some scenes feel like they are padding out the story just to satisfy this run-time. The musical number, “The Tiny Scout (He Knows You Inside Out)” easily comes to mind. I recognize this musical number, as well as the musical number, “Tomorrow Land”, were intended to emphasize the direction Terry’s career has taken. But, in my opinion, featuring only one of these musical numbers would have been enough to make this point. If An Affair to Remember’s creative team had cut scenes like “The Tiny Scout (He Knows You Inside Out)” musical number, the film’s run-time would have been trimmed down.
A drawn-out story: Like I just mentioned in this review, an hour and fifty-five minutes is the run-time for An Affair to Remember. This run-time seemed to give the film’s creative team an excuse to draw their story out. The first half of the movie builds up to the affair of Nickie and Terry. Their affair doesn’t come to fruition until the movie’s halfway point. The second half of the movie chronicles how Terry’s and Nickie’s life turned out after their cruise. Personally, I don’t think the affair’s build-up needed to last half the film. With a tighter script, An Affair to Remember not only could have received a short run-time, the story could have also reached its intended points sooner.
Based on Deborah Kerr’s movies I’ve seen, the quality of these pictures has fluctuated. While I liked The King and I and The Chalk Garden, I wasn’t a fan of Marriage on the Rocks. But I found An Affair to Remember to be just ok. While the on-screen chemistry between Deborah Kerr and Cary Grant was strong and the dialogue was well-written, I didn’t like how drawn-out the story was. Plus, some scenes felt included simply to pad out the script to satisfy the run-time. However, the most disappointing part of An Affair to Remember was how New Year’s Eve was treated as an afterthought. Before seeing the 1957 picture, I was led to believe the holiday would play a larger role in the story. My first movie selected for 2026’s Genre Grandeur was not the best, but not the worst. Hopefully, this year-long blogathon will introduce me to stronger films.
Overall score: 6.2-6.3 out of 10
Have you seen An Affair to Remember? Which film from Deborah Kerr’s or Cary Grant’s filmography would you like to see me review next? Let me know in the comment section!
Great American Family’s Ainsley McGregor Mysteries series has become a pleasant surprise for 18 Cinema Lane. My review of Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Winemaker became one of my most popular movie reviews of all time, garnering over seven thousand views in almost two years. The positive reception of this review led me to cover the sequel, Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Yarn Maker. That review has also been well received, obtaining over two hundred views so far. When I discovered Great American Family was not only releasing a third chapter, they were also premiering the third chapter in January 2026, I knew that’d be one of the first movies to be written about in the New Year! Though there’s only been two movies in the Ainsley McGregor Mysteries series, so far, the series as a whole has been quite enjoyable. What has worked in the series’ favor is improving upon the flaws of the previous chapter and providing consistent strengths. Will the third chapter, Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker, continue this pattern? Let’s find out in this review!
Subtle hints of Texas: When I reviewed Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Winemaker, I criticized the film for its constant reminders of the story’s Texas setting. To me, these reminders tried to make the movie’s setting a little too obvious for the audience. This flaw was remedied in Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker! References to the series’ Sweet River, Texas setting were represented through some of the women’s wardrobe. One of the Book Club members, Maria, sometimes dons turquoise jewelry. Another Book Club member, Lily, wears a sweatshirt featuring a cowboy/cowgirl hat and cowboy/cowgirl boots. Even Ainsley herself can be seen wearing a blouse similar to those worn by country music stars. Besides the wardrobe, there were other subtle hints of Texas found in Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker. A great example is when one of the Book Club members uses a pen shaped like a cactus.
Selecting a cold case: While seeking another mystery to solve, the Book Club decides on a cold case. As they mentioned in the movie, the cold case provided a nice change of pace for them. Not only did this decision benefit the Book Club, it also benefitted Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker! By having a cold case as the movie’s main mystery, it prevents the series from becoming repetitive, as the previous two chapters revolved around murder mysteries that happened in the present. This creative choice shows other ways mysteries can become solved as well. In the case of Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker, most of the clues were found within the dialogue. Selecting a cold case for the characters to solve was definitely an interesting decision for the third film in the Ainsley McGregor Mysteries series!
Rance Moseby: A new character that was introduced in Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker was Rance Moseby, the proprietor of a local pawn shop. At first, Ainsley and Jake believe Rance may be up to no good. But as the story progresses, Rance proves that looks can be deceiving. While I was watching Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker, I grew to like Rance as a character. David Milchard, the actor who portrayed Rance, had great on-screen chemistry with the movie’s cast. The strength of David’s acting talents helped make Rance seem like he was always meant to exist in the world of the Ainsley McGregor Mysteries series. Rance’s drier sense of humor nicely provided the film’s comic relief as well. If there are more Ainsley McGregor Mysteries movies in the works, I really hope Rance Moseby becomes a part of the series’ regular cast!
An unnecessary subplot: Throughout Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker, a subplot revolved around Jake’s past romantic relationship with the mayor of Sweet River, Jane Reval. Even though it was interesting to see how this new character connected to an established character like Jake, I found this subplot unnecessary. Because Jake and Ainsley are currently dating, Jake has no interest in reuniting with Jane. This fact prevents the subplot from going anywhere. It also doesn’t help that the subplot has a loose connection to the main mystery. In my opinion, the least interesting part of Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker was the subplot between Jane and Jake.
Inconsistent humor: In my review of Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Yarn Maker, I praised the movie’s inclusion of humor. It was not only sprinkled throughout the story, it was also woven into the dialogue. While there was humor in Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker, it wasn’t consistently featured in the story. In fact, most of the movie’s humor was found in the second half of the film, when Rance becomes more involved in the mystery. This flaw kind of makes me wish Rance debuted in Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker sooner.
Limited screen-time for George: One of the aspects I liked in Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Winemaker was Ainsley’s dog, George. Moments where Ainsley talks to George gave viewers a break from the heaviness of the story’s murder mystery. Plus, his larger role in the first chapter gave the film a more unique identity. But in the second movie, Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Yarn Maker, George’s screen-time was reduced. I was hoping this flaw would be corrected in Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker. But, unfortunately, George received even less screen-time, only appearing in two scenes. The reduction of George’s screen-time as the Ainsley McGregor Mysteries series continues disappoints me, especially since George is one of my favorite parts of this series.
When I talked about Mystery by the Book in my list of The Best and Worst Movies I Saw in 2025, I brought up how Great American Family’s Ainsley McGregor Mysteries series is growing stronger in quality. The third chapter, Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker, proves my statement correct, as I found it the best movie in the series so far! Selecting a cold case as the movie’s main mystery prevented the overarching story of Ainsley McGregor Mysteries from becoming repetitive. The creative team behind the 2026 film improved upon flaws from the previous titles, such as making subtle references to the series’ Texas setting. Even though the acting was, once again, one of the strengths of Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker, David Milchard’s portrayal of Rance Moseby stole the show. In fact, I’d say Rance was the MVP of this movie! Despite the film having its flaws, the film itself shows the Ainsley McGregor Mysteries series is moving in the right direction. I do hope this series continues, as I believe there are many more stories to tell!
Overall score: 7.5-7.6 out of 10
Have you seen Ainsley McGregor Mysteries: A Case for the Watchmaker? What would you like to see happen if the series continues? Let me know in the comment section!
I was first introduced to Michael Wincott as an actor when I saw The Crow for the first time. Because his portrayal of Top Dollar left such a memorable impression, I wanted to seek out other projects from his filmography. I also wanted to review one of his projects on his birthday. But, until this year, I hadn’t gotten around to doing that. When I discovered Michael had guest-starred on an episode of Miami Vice, I became interested in checking out his performance. Seeking out this episode also gave me an introduction to Miami Vice, as I have never watched the show before. So, in honor of Michael’s birthday, I am publishing this special tv show episode review! Like my other television related reviews, I will discuss what I liked about the episode, what I didn’t like about the episode, the story itself, the other factors from this episode, and my overall thoughts. So, before we can start singing the “Happy Birthday” song, let’s begin this review!
Miami Vicelogo created by Michael Mann Productions, Universal Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
Episode Name: Blood & Roses
Season 4, Episode 19
Premiere Date: April 1st, 1988
The title card for “Blood & Roses“. Screenshot taken by me, Sally Silverscreen.
What I liked about this episode:
In this episode of Miami Vice, a detective named Gina goes undercover as the love interest of a criminal named Frank Mosca. But the longer she stays undercover, the more the mission takes its toll on her. It gets to the point where Frank makes unwanted romantic advances on Gina. One day at the station, Gina tearfully confesses to another detective named Trudy how what she’s doing makes her feel guilty. She is still shaken up by what Frank did to her. If a character goes undercover or is given a top-secret mission on a police/detective procedural show like Miami Vice, the allure and thrill of the mission itself is given so much emphasis, its effect on the characters is rarely addressed, especially if the character is a woman. Gina’s confession to Trudy honestly highlights how, at the end of the day, the characters on police/detective procedural shows are human, complete with emotional limits and breaking points. It also helps how that scene was well-acted and well-written.
What I didn’t like about this episode:
As I said in the introduction of this review, Michael Wincott is the reason why I sought out this episode of Miami Vice. His performance was one of the best parts of this episode because he displayed chameleon-like control over his character’s emotions, which was reminiscent of his portrayal of Top Dollar. But within this forty-seven-minute episode, Michael only appeared in a total of four scenes. Plus, his portrayal of Wilson Cook became overshadowed by Stanley Tucci’s portrayal of Frank Mosca. It was disappointing to watch another project from Michael’s filmography where his talents were underutilized.
Frank Mosca is laundering money through the various banks he owns. Based on the dialogue in this episode of Miami Vice, Frank has crossed paths with the protagonists of the show before. So, the story in “Blood & Roses” is similar to a storyline from the show, Columbo; waiting for the other shoe to drop by determining how the guilty party will get caught. For the majority of Miami Vice’s forty-seven-minute episode, however, the story contained a lack of urgency. A stronger sense of urgency didn’t arrive until the last six minutes of the episode. But this creative decision caused the conflict’s resolution to feel rushed. Plus, the way Frank’s defeat was achieved by the protagonists was a little too easily reached. That creative choice seemed like it was chosen just to satisfy the episode’s run-time.
The other factors from this episode:
Like I said earlier in this review, Gina goes undercover as Frank’s love interest. One of her reasons for spending so much time with Frank is how she is posing as an interior designer. During one of their conversations, Gina brings up potential design themes like “Santa Fe” and “Nashville” Frank could adopt for his house. With Miami Vice taking place in Miami, Florida in the 1980s, I’m surprised Gina didn’t suggest Frank select an aesthetic the city, let alone the state, is known for. Miami is famous for its bright color schemes and vibrant energy. Based on the rooms from Frank’s house that were shown on screen, I’m pretty sure at least one of the aesthetics of Miami could have been effortlessly woven into Frank’s house.
Speaking of Frank’s house, some of the design choices featured in this episode were, in my opinion, strange. Frank’s office prominently features a wall length mirror behind where Frank is sitting. If he’s not even utilizing the mirror as a reflective tool, like in a dance studio, why does his office need a mirror in the first place? Right next to the house’s main staircase is a koi pond. To me, having a koi pond so close to the staircase seems like a tripping hazard, especially considering there isn’t a buffer between the floor and the edge of the pond. Had Frank’s house contained a connected greenhouse where the koi pond was located, it would have made more sense.
I said in the introduction of this review how I have never watched Miami Vice before. Despite this, I thought Don Johnson and Saundra Santiago’s on-screen chemistry was one of the best parts of this episode! Even though their characters, James and Gina, shared very little screen-time together, I could sense a radiant spark between them. Because Don’s and Saundra’s acting talents were so strong together, I wish Gina and James’ relationship had been featured more in “Blood & Roses”. However, I recognize there’s only so much story you can tell in forty-seven-minutes.
Since I’m reviewing this episode of Miami Vice on Michael Wincott’s birthday, I thought including a picture of his character, Wilson Cook, in this review made sense. Screenshot taken by me, Sally Silverscreen.
My overall thoughts:
Even though this is my first time watching Miami Vice, I was familiar with the general concept of the show. Therefore, I had an idea of what to expect. Based on these expectations, I thought “Blood & Roses” was going to contain a strong sense of suspense, intrigue, and action. What I ended up getting was a forty-seven-minute episode that mostly lacked a sense of urgency. Because a stronger sense of urgency didn’t appear until the last six minutes of the episode, the conflict’s resolution felt rushed and the defeat of Frank (the episode’s villain) was too easily achievable for the protagonists. But out of the television episodes I’ve reviewed on 18 Cinema Lane, “Blood & Roses” isn’t one of the worst episodes I’ve covered. There were elements of the episode I liked, such as how the show honestly addressed how undercover missions can affect the characters. I even liked some of the acting performances, especially between Don Johnson and Saundra Santiago. However, I wish I had more to say about Michael Wincott’s involvement in this episode, since I’m reviewing it on his birthday.
Before school begins in Hope Valley, Elizabeth states how she wants to create a routine for the students of Benson Hills so they can have a sense of normalcy in their lives. When I first heard what Elizabeth said, I remembered how When Calls the Heart has created their own routine. For Hearties, it’s the fact the show itself premieres each episode at a consistent time on a consistent day of the week. Behind the scenes, this routine looks like a block of days or months set aside for filming, screenwriting, and editing. These routines created by the show give the cast, crew, and Hearties expectations, a sense of predictability, but most importantly, something to look forward to. Even when this routine has become interrupted, the creative team behind When Calls the Heart has adapted to the best of their abilities so the routine carries on as smoothly as possible. Few television shows have survived past ten seasons like When Calls the Heart. What seems to have worked in When Calls the Heart’s favor is building a strong and stable routine.
Just a reminder: If you did not see this episode of When Calls the Heart, there will be spoilers within this re-cap.
When Calls the Heartseason thirteen poster created by Hallmark Media, Crown Media Family Networks and Hallmark Channel
Season: 13
Episode: 3
Name: Back to School
Major stories:
The children of Hope Valley and Benson Hills are going back to school. But for the students of Benson Hills, they are having a difficult time adjusting to their new educational surroundings. One young girl tells Elizabeth how she’s tired of receiving people’s sad faces. Gwendolyn, who likes to be called Gwen, is carving into one of the desks with a fork belonging to Rosemary. Elizabeth encourages Hope Valley’s students to sit with the students from Benson Hills in an effort to integrate Benson Hills’ children into her class. But Elizabeth feels there is more she can do to make all her students feel like they are part of a community. Later in the episode, Elizabeth, Nathan, and Jack Jr. organize a field day. Everyone participates in the activities except for Cooper and Toby. They turn to Elizabeth toward the end of the episode to reveal they made a small cooking fire during their hike in the national park. However, Toby and Cooper reassure Elizabeth they put the fire out. As they reflect on what happened, they second guess if their fire was what caused the national park, Rosemary’s Playhouse, and Benson Hills to burn.
Lee is convinced someone intentionally started the fire in Goldie National Park. One day, at the saloon, Mollie confesses to Lee how, on the day of the fire, she saw an older gentleman entering the park carrying what looked like a kerosine can. Even though Bill and Nathan are currently conducting an investigation, Lee wants McGinty to be held accountable, as he believes McGinty is responsible for the fire. But when Lee confronts McGinty about the fire at the saloon, McGinty is appalled by Lee’s accusations. Nathan arrests Lee after Lee punched McGinty. When Rosemary picks up Lee from the jail, Lee shares how all he wants is for the guilty party to be held responsible for what they did. Rosemary reminds her husband how they don’t know all the answers yet.
The residents of Benson Hills are literally and figuratively picking up the pieces of their lives after the fire. Some of Hope Valley’s residents, including Mei, volunteer to take Benson Hills’ residents back to Benson Hills to reclaim their lost possessions. Maisie, Benson Hills’ mayor and Mike’s sister, is trying to acquire relief funds to rebuild Benson Hills. When Mei offers Maisie a place to stay at her and Mike’s apartment, Maisie turns down the offer at first because she doesn’t want Benson Hills’ residents to believe she gave up on them. But after Mei finds a baby portrait of Mike from what was Maisie’s house, Maisie realizes her family is just trying to support her. Meanwhile, Lucas agrees to appear at a meeting about insurance claims, organized by Edie and Maisie. But due to a scheduled dinner that runs longer than planned, Lucas ends up missing the meeting.
Like I mentioned in this re-cap post, Gwen carves into one of the desks with a fork belonging to Rosemary. Later in the episode, at the Coulter family’s house (where Gwen is currently residing), Gwen tries her hand at woodcarving under Lee’s guiding eye. The two instances I brought up make me wonder if Gwen will eventually take up woodcarving as a hobby? Maybe this new hobby will help Gwen pass the time and make new friends until she can be reunited with her father?
Rupert is one of Elizabeth’s newest students from Benson Hills. During class, he brings up his past studies about ancient Rome. Rupert even talks about a class project he made that became lost in the fire. In my list of the Thirteen Questions for When Calls the Heart’s 13th Season, I wondered if another student would receive the Hope Valley Scholarship. With Rupert’s expressed desire for learning, could Rupert be the next Hope Valley Scholarship recipient? Though he is one of Benson Hills’ students, perhaps he could the exception to the rule.
In this episode of When Calls the Heart, Elizabeth brings up the idea of a poetry club, in order to encourage Oliver to read William Shakespeare’s work. Reflecting on Elizabeth’s idea, it would be great if Hope Valley had a book club! The library would be the club’s official meeting spot. Different stories and genres could be explored within the club. Maybe they could even solve mysteries like in the Ainsley McGregor Mysteries series! Since Hearties know a fourteenth season is on the horizon, perhaps Hope Valley could see its first book club come to fruition.
What are your thoughts on this episode of When Calls the Heart? What lessons do you hope Elizabeth’s students learn in their upcoming school year? Please tell me in the comment section!
I’ve heard Hope Valley referred as a “sanctuary” in this episode of When Calls the Heart. While this was a reference to Benson Hills’ evacuees coming to Hope Valley, I’ve thought about the town as a “sanctuary” for other characters on the show. When Mei was introduced back in season nine, Hope Valley became her “sanctuary” as she was escaping from a bad relationship. Hope Valley was also a “sanctuary” for both Jesse and Clara, as they found a second chance and love in this very town. And, recently, Hope Valley has turned into a “sanctuary” for Jack Jr. and Elizabeth, providing Jack Jr. with a healthy place to live and Elizabeth peace of mind. Hope Valley has been plentiful for its residents, giving them what truly needed. Whether it was forgiveness, extra help on math homework, or an opportunity to give back, everyone in Hope Valley has been provided for.
Just a reminder: If you did not see this episode of When Calls the Heart, there will be spoilers within this re-cap.
When Calls the Heartseason thirteen poster created by Hallmark Media, Crown Media Family Networks and Hallmark Channel
Season: 13
Episode: 2
Name: Up in Smoke
Major stories:
Allie, Cooper, Toby, and Opal are lost within a fiery Goldie National Park. Attempting to find their way out of the park, Opal and Allie travel in one direction while Toby and Cooper go in another direction. Fortunately, all four children are rescued by Nathan, Bill, Oliver, and Joseph. Meanwhile, Lucas leads some of Hope Valley’s residents to create a fire trap in order to stop the fire. With the fire potentially spreading to Hope Valley, evacuation plans are made. Edie even rescues her animals from her cabin. But because winds eventually move easterly, Hope Valley is out of the fire’s path. However, the changing winds make Benson Hills the fire’s next target. Rosemary warns the town through a radio broadcast, giving residents enough time to flee. Though the fire burns past the fire trap and destroys Benson Hills’ main street, as well as half the town’s houses, there are no casualties. But Benson Hills is not the only location to be affected by the fire. Goldie National Park is destroyed and Rosemary’s Playhouse went up in smoke.
Hope Valley literally and figuratively opens its doors to the evacuated residents of Benson Hills. One of those residents is a young girl named Gwendolyn. During the evacuation, Gwendolyn and her father became separated. Until her father comes to Hope Valley to reunite with his daughter, Gwendolyn vows to stay at the saloon. As the day carries on, however, Gwendolyn’s father doesn’t show up in Hope Valley. But Gwendolyn agrees to stay with the Coulters and be Goldie’s babysitter. The next day, Gwendolyn learns from Nathan her father is staying at a hospital in Buxton. At the moment, though, Gwendolyn is advised not to visit her father yet, as doctors don’t want his injuries to become infected.
Everyone in Hope Valley lends a helping hand during the fire at Goldie National Park. Besides the rescue and fire trap efforts, Lee and Mike also attempt to put out the fire with the town’s fire truck. As the fire spreads to Benson Hills, donations for the evacuees are given and organized. Even Minnie cooks hot meals for them. With the day turning into night, other residents of Hope Valley make big impacts through small acts. Rosemary and Lucas host a magic show to entertain the children. When the power goes out, Faith makes sure the Infirmary’s refrigerator is properly working with the help of a back-up generator. This way, Jack Jr. can always have Insulin available. Even though the power returns the following day and everyone is accounted for, the timing of everything doesn’t feel like a coincidence to Lee. He brings up the idea of an investigation to Bill and Nathan, believing McGinty is responsible for starting the fire.
There were no minor stories in this episode because all the stories revolved around the fire at Goldie National Park.
Campfire with marshmellows and shooting stars image created by macrovector at freepik.com.
Some thoughts to consider:
As I said in this re-cap post, Rosemary’s Playhouse went up in smoke. When Lee told Rosemary what happened, I became incredibly disappointed, especially after expressing excitement in the last re-cap post over finally seeing Rosemary’s theater come to life. What’s also disappointing is how the theater itself wasn’t shown on screen yet. I’d like to think Rosemary’s Playhouse could get rebuilt by the end of the season. But When Calls the Heart does not have a strong track record when it comes to keeping promises. One such example is when the show promised to give Jesse and Clara an outdoor wedding despite the show’s creative team knowing the weather would prevent them from filming any outdoor events. At this point, I’m cautiously optimistic.
On social media, I’ve read some comments from Lucas’ fans expressing their disinterest in seeing Lucas and Edie falling in love. They believe Miranda MacDougall and Chris McNally, the actress and actor who portray Edie and Lucas, lack on-screen chemistry. While I wouldn’t mind seeing Lucas and Edie become a couple, they haven’t shared enough screentime together for me to determine if Chris and Miranda truly share on-screen chemistry that is strong. Even though this is only the second episode, I hope Edie and Lucas get to spend more time together this season.
Despite only being season thirteen’s second episode, the episode itself was very strong! Higher stakes were consistently incorporated into the story. The characters well-being was in danger without the screenwriters believing they had to kill characters off the show. Plus, the outcome of the fire leaves a lot of questions for the rest of the season. It’ll be interesting to see where the story goes from here.
What are your thoughts on this episode of When Calls the Heart? Do you think the fire at Goldie National Park was intentionally started? Leave your thoughts in the comment section!
As I explained in my recent review of A Circle of Children, I’m covering the sequel, Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II for the Film. Release. Repeat. Blogathon. Because I’ve been meaning to review the 1978 television film since 2022, I believed the blogathon was a great time to finally check the movie out! But as I also mentioned in my review of A Circle of Children, I haven’t found a made-for-tv movie from the 1970s I actually like. Whenever I’ve selected this particular type of film to write about, I find the film itself either fine, ok, or underwhelming. This is one of the reasons why I put “1970s Made-for-TV movie” on my Year-Long Bingo card, so I could, hopefully, find a television movie I enjoy from that decade. When I saw and reviewed A Circle of Children, I thought it was just ok. Will its sequel be better? Let’s begin this review to find out!
Lovey A Circle of Children, Part II title card created by Time-Life Television Productions and CBS
Things I liked about the film:
A smaller cast: In my review of A Circle of Children, I mentioned the film containing a large cast of characters. This is one of the reasons why the audience was forced to either only become familiar with the characters or not getting to know them at all. This flaw became remedied in Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II! In the 1978 sequel, the cast is much smaller. Even Mary’s class contains fewer students. Because the story has less characters to keep track of, it gives the audience an opportunity to truly get to know the characters. The audience also has more time to spend with characters like Mary’s students and even Mary’s boyfriend, Cal, because of a tightly written script.
Progression that’s written gradually: When I reviewed A Circle of Children, I talked about how Sarah’s sudden achieved progress taking place after being a static character for half the movie felt like it was written into the story for the sake of plot and time convenience. Even though I was happy to see Sarah achieving progress, I wish that progress was gradually woven into the script. It seems like the creative team behind Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II felt the same way I did, as Hannah’s/Lovey’s progression was gradual. Hannah/Lovey joins Mary’s class as an unruly child who is very unpredictable. But as the film goes on, Mary’s influence takes effect on Hannah/Lovey as she becomes more responsive, less violent, and even participates in class. The smaller cast size I talked about earlier certainly influenced this part of the story. It allowed Hannah’s/Lovey’s progression to receive emphasis instead of competing against other stories. The transformative power of Mary’s teaching abilities is also on full display because of the gradually written progression of Hannah/Lovey.
The dialogue: Like I said in my list of The Best and Worst Movies I Saw in 2025, how well-written the dialogue was in The Chalk Garden allowed me to remember what Laurel said about the term “good morning”. The quality of the screenwriting was also a strength in Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II! Some of the dialogue in the 1978 movie sounded profound without trying too hard to be philosophical. A great example can be heard during a conversation between Mary and a fellow teacher named Patty. Patty feels discouraged over the lack of progress from her students. Mary reassures Patty that her impact on the students has been positive, reminding Patty how hope comes from believing the children can learn something. Patty then tells Mary, “Yeah, but you can’t mop the floors with hope”. Mary experiences her own period of discouragement after Hannah/Lovey has an angry outburst involving paint. In a voice-over, Mary says, “For a moment, my dreams and plans for Hannah shattered. But paint is only paint and never worth a dream. Besides, a teacher’s dream dies hard”. The two examples I provided show how Mary’s and Patty’s frustrations and concerns were eloquently and thoughtfully written into the script.
How Hannah was introduced: As I’ve already said in this review, Hannah/Lovey joins Mary’s class as an unruly child who is very unpredictable. However, I found her introduction in Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II to be distasteful. As Mary walks down the hallway to retrieve Hannah/Lovey, suspenseful music plays over the scene. The music itself sounds as if it came straight out of a horror movie. The reveal of Hannah’s/Lovey’s face was prolonged because of specific camera angles that were utilized. When Hannah’s/Lovey’s face was finally revealed, a frozen close-up shot was presented to intentionally appear frightening. To me, the introduction I described felt sensationalized to the point of being counterproductive of what Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II was trying to achieve; making the audience feel empathetic toward Hannah/Lovey by looking past her horrific behavior. I truly believe there was a more tasteful way Hannah/Lovey could have been introduced in the story, especially compared to how some of the students were introduced in A Circle of Children.
Doris’ limited involvement in the story: A Circle of Children introduced Doris as the director of the Children’s School for Special Education. Though she appeared in only a handful of scenes, Doris’ role was pivotal as she literally and figuratively opened the door for Mary to the world of Special Education. Doris was one of the few characters from the first movie to return in the sequel. But she was given even more limited involvement in the second film. While she was still the director of the Children’s School for Special Education, her role in Mary’s story had a reduced significance. I wish Doris received more to do in Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II because I think she could have made a bigger impact.
Lack of further progression: I said earlier in this review how Hannah’s/Lovey’s progression was written gradually into the story. Even though this was one of the movie’s strengths, I didn’t like how there was a lack of further progression for two of Mary’s students. While Hannah/Lovey was improving her reading skills and Brian (from the first movie) was learning how to board the bus by himself, Rufus and Jamie were at a standstill in their education. With a smaller cast size I talked about in this review, there should have been room in the script to give Jamie and Rufus at least a small victory. At the end of Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II, Mary reveals through a voice-over what happened to her students. However, not showing Rufus and Jamie achieving further progression in the movie was a missed opportunity.
Sometimes, a sequel ends up becoming better than its predecessor. Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II just so happens to be one of those films! Some of the flaws of A Circle of Children were improved upon in the second chapter, such as containing a smaller cast and the script featuring a gradual progression for Hannah/Lovey. The sequel even had its own unique strengths from its predecessor, like how well-written the dialogue was. But despite these positive aspects, Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II did have its flaws. I believe there are more respectful ways Hannah/Lovey could have been introduced into the story, as her debut in the film was too sensationalized for my liking. I not only wish Jamie and Rufus had received further progression in the movie, I also wish Doris was given a greater significance in the script. But similar to what I said in my review of A Circle of Children, I’m grateful Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II exists at all. The 1978 film gives the audience a glimpse into what Special Education was like in the 1970s. It’s a made-for-tv movie that was spared from getting lost to time as well.
Overall score: 7.2 out of 10
Have you seen Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II? Are there any made-for-tv movies from the 1970s you’d like to see me cover on 18 Cinema Lane? Please tell me in the comment section!
Back in 2022, I wrote a list of the Top 10 Movies I’d Love to Review. Each chosen film was categorized based on how accessible they are. Reflecting on this list, I realized that as of early January 2026, the only more “accessible” titles not yet covered on my blog were A Circle of Children and Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II. With the Film. Release. Repeat. Blogathon (an event about remakes and sequels) on the horizon, I finally found a reason to review the 1978 sequel. However, I’ve never seen its predecessor, A Circle of Children. So, in preparation for my review of Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II, I’m also writing about the first film. As I said in my list of the Top 10 Movies I’d Love to Review, both A Circle of Children and Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II are based on the true story of a teacher named Mary MacCracken. Like I also said in my list, Mary’s books were not only the source material for these movies, Mary was also one of the screenwriters for both films. But over these eight years of 18 Cinema Lane’s existence, I haven’t found a made-for-tv movie from the 1970s I actually like. Will A Circle of Children change that? Let’s begin the first movie review of 2026 to find out!
A Circle of Children (1977) title card created by Edgar Scherick Productions, 20th Century Fox Television, and CBS
Things I liked about the film:
The acting: In A Circle of Children, the protagonist, Mary, visits the mother of a student named Brian O’Connell. During Mary’s conversation with Mrs. O’Connell, Brian’s mother consistently has a worn look on her face. Not only did Mrs. O’Connell’s eyes look heavy, her mouth was set in a straight line as well. Her voice almost sounded monotone, lacking emotion over her situation. Though she admits to Mary that she’s tired, Mrs. O’Connell was able to express how tired she was without relying too much on dialogue. That’s because Judy Lewis, the actress who portrayed Mrs. O’Connell, effectively utilized vocal inflection, facial expression, and even her eyes to emphasize what her character was going through.
Speaking of Brian O’Connell, I want to talk about Matthew Labyorteaux’s performance! I am familiar with his portrayal of Albert on Little House on the Prairie. Therefore, Matthew’s acting capabilities are already known to me. Mary teaching Brian to speak presents a great display of Matthew’s acting talents. When Mary is using a tape recorder in order to help Brian learn to speak, Brian has a blank look on his face. But when a teacher named Dan sings a song to the students, he offers the microphone to Brian. This time, Brian has a determined look on his face, as he intensely looks at the microphone and makes a great effort of trying to repeat Dan’s song. The next scene shows Brian receiving a second chance to speak into the microphone. His eyes become really wide and a smile spreads across his face, excited by the opportunity given by Mary and Dan. As I watched A Circle of Children, it made me believe Little House on the Prairie’s creative team chose wisely when they cast Matthew as Albert!
Since A Circle of Children is based on the true story of Mary MacCracken, I must discuss Jane Alexander’s portrayal of Mary. Throughout the movie, Jane’s performance brought empathy and relatability to her role. One great example happens when Mary encourages Brian to say his name. Brian puts together a puzzle resembling a short story he was reading earlier in the film. Because one of the characters in that story was named Brian, Mary uses this fact to motivate Brian to say his name for the first time since coming to the Children’s School for Special Education. When this plan fails, Mary develops a look of defeat on her face. Her mouth is turned into a frown and her eyes present a mixture of sadness and concern. This medium shot of Mary’s face not only says so much without saying anything at all, it also shows the audience how much she cares about the students, especially Brian.
The chemistry of Mary and Dan: When Mary first visits the Children’s School for Special Education, she meets a teacher named Dan. Over the course of A Circle of Children, Dan and Mary develop a friendship that is shown in only a handful of scenes. Despite this, their chemistry highlights how the two have become kindred spirits, bringing thoughtfulness and understanding to their friendship. The chemistry between Mary and Dan works because the on-screen chemistry between Jane Alexander and David Ogden Stiers (the actor who portrays Dan) works! The strength of their acting abilities allows David and Jane to effectively present a friendship that looked and felt believable. Because of how well they seemed to get along, I was hoping Dan and Mary’s friendship would gradually become a romance. Mary and Dan’s chemistry was such a pleasant surprise in A Circle of Children!
Creating a complex character: One of the teachers at the Children’s School for Special Education is Helga. At first, she and Mary don’t see eye to eye due to how Helga treats the students. Some examples include making a child plunge the toilet and intentionally hiding a young girl’s (literal) security blanket. But as the story goes on, Mary, as well as the audience, learns Helga actually has good intentions for the students. In fact, she wants the children to succeed just as much as Mary does. It would have been so easy for A Circle of Children’s creative team to present Helga as a one-dimensional mean teacher. Instead, the screenwriting and Rachel Roberts’ performance created a character that was complex, representing how, sometimes, approaches to education aren’t straightforward. Helga’s complexity made her a memorable character as well!
Only becoming familiar with characters: A Circle of Children consists of a large cast of characters. That’s because most of the characters are students from the Children’s School for Special Education. But A Circle of Children has a run-time of an hour and thirty-six minutes, leaving the audience with not enough time to truly get to know the characters. The film’s run-time actually forces the audience to either only become familiar with the characters or not getting to know them at all. Had A Circle of Children received a longer run-time, more opportunities to show Mary getting to know her students and help them could have been provided in the story.
Scene transitions that weren’t smooth: If a movie features smooth transitions between scenes, they can not only help the audience process the story unfolding, they can also maintain the film’s overarching pace. But in the case of A Circle of Children, choppy scene transitions sometimes created emotional whiplash. In one glaring example, Mary and her husband, Larry, confess to their daughter, Liz, of their recent separation. This confession is so upsetting, Mary herself appears to be on the verge of crying. However, the very next scene shows Mary being interviewed for a teaching aide position at the Children’s School for Special Education. This scene is intended to be less sad than the scene I previously described. To me, the transition between these two scenes felt jarring because the transition itself was choppy and abrupt.
Solutions happening for the sake of plot and time convenience: Within the first fifteen minutes of A Circle of Children, a young girl named Sarah is enrolled at the Children’s School for Special Education. According to Sarah’s mother, Sarah is unable to stand or walk. She’s also so attached to a blanket that she continuously screams at the top of her lungs if the blanket is taken away from her. For half the movie, though, Sarah is a static character. She’s either shown lying on the floor sucking her thumb or screaming because she can’t find her blanket. But at a Christmas party that takes place a little more than halfway through the movie, Sarah not only randomly starts walking, she also willingly trades her blanket for a doll. While I was happy to see Sarah achieving progress, I wish this progress was gradually woven into the script. Because Sarah suddenly achieved progress after being a static character for half the movie, the moment itself felt like it was written into the story for the sake of plot and time convenience.
In the introduction of this review, I said I haven’t found a made-for-tv movie from the 1970s I actually like. Sadly, A Circle of Children will not be the film to change that. The 1977 production isn’t a bad movie. In fact, it has its merits, especially when it comes to the acting performances. But I found the story itself to be too “slice of life” for my liking. Plus, there were other flaws that stood out to me, such as the run-time and choppy scene transitions. Looking back on A Circle of Children, however, I will admit my gratitude for its existence at all. This movie is like a time capsule when it comes to Special Education, giving viewers a glimpse into how this specific topic was approached in the 1970s. Though the film only shares one teacher’s perspective, it does express themes of helping others reach their full potential, working together to achieve a common goal, and not giving up on others. The creative team behind A Circle of Children definitely had their hearts in the right place. Now that I’ve finally seen this movie, it’ll be interesting to see where the story in Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II goes from here.
Overall score: 6 out of 10
Have you seen A Circle of Children? Are you looking forward to my review of Lovey: A Circle of Children, Part II? Let me know in the comment section!
In the season thirteen premiere of When Calls the Heart, Rosemary and Lee have a conversation about Rosemary’s new Playhouse. She’s discouraged by a news article from the Benson Hills Beatle calling the Playhouse a “vanity project”. Lee reassures his wife by reminding Rosemary how opening the Playhouse is her way of sharing her heart with everyone. As I’ve mentioned in past Sunset Over Hope Valley re-cap posts, my introductions are inspired either by what a character says, something that happens in an episode, or an observation I’ve made while watching the show. When Lee’s conversation with Rosemary made her theater finally seem like a reality, I knew I had to bring it up in my re-cap’s introduction! As a Heartie who’s been watching When Calls the Heart since literally day one, I have been waiting for Rosemary’s dream of opening a theater to come true for over ten years. I’ve even brought it up in some of my re-cap posts as well as articles related to the show. Though few details were revealed about the Playhouse, I’m excited to see Rosemary’s dream come to life in Hope Valley! Having a long-awaited wish granted is definitely a good way to start the New Year!
Just a reminder: If you did not see the season premiere of When Calls the Heart, there will be spoilers within this re-cap.
When Calls the Heartseason thirteen poster created by Hallmark Media, Crown Media Family Networks and Hallmark Channel
Season: 13
Episode: 1
Name: Up In the Air
Major stories:
Over the summer, Elizabeth, Jack Jr., Nathan, and Allie have been living at Charlotte’s boarding house in Cape Fullerton while Jack Jr. has received Diabetic treatment. This living situation was meant to be temporary, however, because the Infirmary in Hope Valley was being prepared to become a certified Diabetic center. But this plan is literally and figuratively derailed, as the country’s only medical inspector, Marvin, is unable to travel due to a railroad strike. So, the trip to Hope Valley for Allie, Nathan, Jack Jr., and Elizabeth is planned as a weekend excursion. Assuming she won’t come back to Hope Valley in time for the start of the school year, Elizabeth prepares to give Minnie her lesson plans. But during a conversation with Rosemary, Nathan comes up with an idea to keep his and Elizabeth’s family permanently in Hope Valley. Remembering what a boarder named Skeet Rivington said about his nephew, Nathan recruits Skeet’s nephew to fly Marvin to Hope Valley’s Infirmary. His plan is successful, as not only is the trip safely executed, the Infirmary officially becomes a certified Diabetic center. This allows Jack Jr., Elizabeth, Allie, and Nathan to stay in Hope Valley for good.
The grand opening of Goldie National Park is just around the corner. Hope Valley has been preparing for this day, from Rosemary and Lee posing for press photos to the town being decorated for the occasion. Even the younger residents of Hope Valley are looking forward to Goldie National Park’s grand opening. Oliver sketches a map of the park to include in the children’s park guidebook. Even Jack Jr. draws pictures for the guidebook covers. But when Toby, Cooper, Opal, and Allie go for a hike in the park, the residents of Hope Valley notice smoke coming from the park’s direction. Concerned over the well-being of Cooper, Allie, Toby, and Opal, the Mounties of Hope Valley (Bill, Nathan, and Oliver) ride toward the park to figure out what is going on.
Theater seats image created by weatherbox at freeimages.com. “FreeImages.com/weatherbox.”
Minor stories:
Henry’s son, Christopher, returns to Hope Valley. This time, he is installing the town’s first traffic light. Christopher likes working at the electric company that helped install the traffic light in Hope Valley. While the money is good, he enjoys being able to help others. During a conversation over lunch at the saloon, Christopher tells Henry about a job offer he’s interested in. Henry reminds his son how he’s more than just his job.
Summer was a busy season for Lucas and Edie. While Lucas prepared for his re-election campaign, Edie dealt with land related legal disputes. Edie utilized Lucas’ office at the saloon whenever he worked on governor duties. However, the idea of Edie and Lucas sharing an office was brought up. During a conversation between Lucas and Lee, as well as during a conversation among Edie, Mollie, and Florence, Lucas and Edie discuss how despite both of them being busy, they miss each other’s company. Though the true nature of Edie and Lucas’ relationship is still up in the air.
As I mentioned in the introduction of this re-cap post, Rosemary’s dream of opening a theater will finally come true. This could not have come at a better time for me. Lately, I’ve been heart-broken and frustrated about Eddie Munson being denied a second chance at receiving his full potential in the fifth and final season of Stranger Things. So, seeing Rosemary’s theater come to fruition has not only given me some much needed joy, it has also given me something to look forward to for the rest of season thirteen!
McGinty, the disgruntled land-owner from season twelve, has returned to Hope Valley in the season thirteen premiere of When Calls the Heart. His conversation with Bill suggests he’s still bitter about how much prime farmland the national park is taking up. Based on the synopsis for upcoming episodes, the wildfire at the national park will be investigated. If the fire was intentionally started, I hope McGinty isn’t the guilty party because that would make the mystery’s outcome predictable. Personally, I’d like to see an interactive and engaging mystery, so the audience can try to solve the mystery alongside the show’s characters.
Like I said in this re-cap post’s introduction, I’ve been watching When Calls the Heart since literally day one. Looking back on how past seasons have begun, season thirteen has one of the better season premieres! This season’s first chapter does a nice job reintroducing Hearties to the world of Hope Valley without feeling overwhelming. Resolutions to conflicts also feel earned instead of being created for the sake of plot convenience. With a cliff-hanger conclusion and some pleasant surprises, season thirteen’s premiere provides enough story points to give the rest of the season intrigue!
Last July, I created a list of thirteen questions for When Calls the Heart’s thirteenth season. One of those questions was whether Edie would actually start her law firm in Hope Valley. Based on how Edie’s story has turned out, so far, in the season thirteen premiere, that law firm hasn’t become a reality yet. But since the season has just started, only time will tell where Edie’s story will go.
What are your thoughts on When Calls the Heart’s thirteenth season premiere? What are you looking forward to this season? Let me know in the comment section below!
18 Cinema Lane 