Quaritch and Varang: Avatar: Fire and Ash’s Complicated Storm

I try to learn more about “popular” characters to understand why they are well-liked. But in order for me to dedicate an editorial to those characters, they need to capture my undivided attention. Colonel Miles Quaritch and Varang did just that as I listened to commentary discourse on Avatar: Fire and Ash. Those discussions about the 2025 film yielded constant praise about Varang and Quaritch’s relationship. Some people claim Quaritch and Varang were the best part of the third film, let alone the Avatar franchise. In fact, they’ve become so popular that Varang received her own unofficial theme song (MONTAGEM BUDA by DYGO). The choir of Varang and Quaritch’s admirers singing their praises genuinely confused me. However, because Quaritch and Varang are the villains of Avatar: Fire and Ash, I decided to write an editorial about their relationship similar to when I wrote about Lestat and Akasha’s relationship (from Queen of the Damned) and Top Dollar and Myca’s relationship (from The Crow). I assumed Quaritch and Varang’s relationship was equally or more toxic than those relationships. Even though they make villainous choices throughout Avatar: Fire and Ash, their relationship is, surprisingly, healthier than some of the problematic relationships from movies I’ve reviewed in the past or I’ve written about on 18 Cinema Lane. In this editorial, I will contrast Varang and Quaritch’s relationship with a handful of other film (and even television) relationships to prove my point. To support my argument, I will utilize examples, screenshots, and quotes from or related to Avatar: Fire and Ash, as well as referencing the other media in question.

My editorial introduction image created by me, Sally Silverscreen. Original image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Who are Quaritch and Varang?

Quaritch and Varang are the villains of Avatar: Fire and Ash, as well as the Avatar franchise. For readers who haven’t seen these films, I will introduce them to Varang and Quaritch. Colonel Miles Quaritch (portrayed by Stephen Lang) has remained an important character through all three Avatar films. In the first movie from 2009, Quaritch was the commander of the RDA’s (Resources Development Administration) security division. He also led the charge in Pandora’s war, attempting to remove the Omatikaya Na’vis from their home in order to provide more space for humans on Pandora. But in Avatar’s final battle, Quaritch was shot and killed by Neytiri, one of the Na’vi from the Omatikaya clan. He returned in the franchise’s second film, Avatar: The Way of Water, which takes place fifteen years after the events of the first movie. This time, however, Quaritch appears as a Na’vi Recombinant with the neurological information from his human self, such as his memories. In both the second and third film in the Avatar franchise, Quaritch maintains his objectives of providing space for humans on Pandora and holding Jake Sully (his former Corporal) accountable for abandoning the RDA in the first film. Quaritch’s second objective becomes disruptive for Jake and his family as the film series progresses.

Left picture: Portrait of Quaritch as a human in 2009’s Avatar. Image created by 20th Century Fox, Dune Entertainment, Ingenious Film Partners, Lightstorm Entertainment, and Walt Disney Studios. Right picture: Portrait of Quaritch as a Na’vi Recombinant in Avatar: Fire and Ash. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Quaritch and Varang (portrayed by Oona Chaplin) meet in Avatar: Fire and Ash. She is the Na’vi olo’eykte (clan leader) and the tsahìk (spiritual leader) of the Mangkwan clan, known for having their home destroyed by a volcanic eruption prior to the events of the third movie. Believing Eywa (the Na’vis’ goddess representative of their belief system) abandoned the Mangkwan clan after the aforementioned volcanic eruption, Varang leads her clan through trauma, anger, and survival. While the Mangkwan Na’vis see her as the glue that’s kept their clan together, other Na’vis see Varang (and the Mangkwan clan) as a threat to Pandora’s society.

Portrait of Varang from Avatar: Fire and Ash. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Varang and Quaritch vs. Achara and Jack

Achara and Jack (from the Lost episode ‘Stranger in a Strange Land’) is the only relationship from a television show included in this discussion. Jack becomes frustrated that Achara won’t share what her “gift” is with him. He becomes so hyper-fixated on learning what Achara’s “gift” is that Jack not only doesn’t take the time to learn more about Achara and the world around her (besides trying Thai food and meeting Achara’s brother in one scene), but he also defines Achara by that one aspect of her life. Throughout her month-long relationship with Jack, Achara remains hesitant to share her “gift” with him. This decision implies she doesn’t fully trust Jack. When Achara eventually reveals what her “gift” is, which is being “able to see who people are” and creating definitive (not decorative) tattoos, Jack forces her to give him this desired explanation. He also forces her to give him a tattoo by forcibly pulling her toward and placing her in a chair by her tattooing station. While Jack is in his drunken fueled aggression and frustration, Achara refuses his request. She cites Jack’s status as an “outsider”, saying that she isn’t allowed to give him a tattoo and giving Jack a tattoo would go against her people. But when Achara’s brother eventually discovers Jack received a tattoo from Achara, he and his friends beat Jack up. Achara’s brother then orders Jack to leave Thailand. Meanwhile, Achara tearfully looks on while this confrontation takes place.

The ash and burnt trees hold proof of the trauma Varang (and the Mangkwan clan) endured. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Varang leads the Mangkwan clan through trauma, anger, and survival after her people’s home was destroyed by a volcanic eruption. This information isn’t revealed in Avatar: Fire and Ash until Varang willingly brings it up when she invites Quaritch in her yurt (tent) during their second interaction together. While recounting her traumatic past, Varang tells Quaritch the following:

“The fire came from the mountain when I was little; burnt our forest. It took everything. My people were starving. They cried for help, but Eywa did not come. So I went to the fire, and I learned its way”.

She also shares with Quaritch how she, along with the rest of the Mangkwan clan, responded to Eywa’s abandonment of them, saying:

“I am the fire! By my hand, my people grow strong! We do not lie down and die just because Eywa turns her back on us! We turn our back on Eywa! A weak mother for weak children. We do not suck on the breast of weakness”.

The fact all this information isn’t brought up in the movie until Varang herself shares it implies she doesn’t freely offer this information, especially to those outside of the Mangkwan clan. During this same interaction, Varang chose to tell him, “I see you” (which has been established in the Avatar franchise as the equivalent of saying “I love you”) and “You have a strong heart. No fear” (which seems to be a term of endearment). For Varang to openly share all this information with Quaritch on her own terms (and within her personal space) shows that she has developed full trust in him. Another example of Varang’s trust in Quaritch takes place in Bridgehead City. When Quaritch arrests Jake and takes him to Bridgehead City, Varang travels there with them. She immediately recognizes how being in an unfamiliar environment and surrounded by more humans than she’s ever interacted with before can be overwhelming. She even tells one of the attending Mangkwan warriors, “Do not show fear”. Yet, while in Bridgehead City, Varang is shown peacefully sleeping in her tent within the Mangkwan camp. Meanwhile, Quaritch is right outside the tent the whole time. People are likely to sleep more soundly if they feel safe. Varang sleeping peacefully inside her tent shows how she trusts Quaritch to keep her safe.

The two photos on the left shows Varang’s awareness of how overwhelming coming to Bridgehead City can be. The photo on the right Varang telling one of the Mangkwan warriors, “Do not show fear”. Images created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
Varang sleeping peacefully shows the trust she’s placed in Quaritch to keep her safe in an unfamiliar place. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
Quaritch and the group of Mangkwan Na’vi are circled in this picture to emphasize how close Quaritch was to Varang. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Throughout Avatar: Fire and Ash, Quaritch is shown trying to understand Varang and the world around her. He teaches her how to use a gun and a flamethrower, providing resources and skills the Mangkwan clan are interested in receiving. While in Bridgehead City, Quaritch speaks with Varang in the Na’vi language. He interacts with other members of the Mangkwan clan besides Varang during his time in Bridgehead City. Quaritch adopts the appearance of a Mangkwan Na’vi, even sporting the clan’s war paint toward the end of the film. Unlike Jack’s confrontation with Achara’s brother and his friends in ‘Stranger in a Strange Land’, Quaritch never faces animosity from the Mangkwan clan whenever he attempts to learn more about Varang and her world. It should be noted that some of Quaritch’s war paint appears to mirror Varang’s, implying her direct influence over their design. With all that said, Quaritch is not disrespecting the cultural boundaries of the Mangkwan clan, a mistake Jack made in the aforementioned Lost episode. Even when Quaritch introduces Varang to a human named General Ardmore in Bridgehead City, he refers to Varang as “Tsahìk of the Mangkwan”. This simple decision highlights three things:

  1. Quaritch is honoring and respecting Varang’s culture, as well as her role within it
  2. He refuses to define Varang by his perception of her (such as referring to her as “my girlfriend” or “my soulmate”), especially after General Ardmore calls Varang Quaritch’s “little missy”
  3. Quaritch believes he doesn’t have to prove his and Varang’s relationship to anyone, as his actions and choices should speak for themselves
The arrows in these photos are pointing out the similarities in Varang’s and Quaritch’s Mangkwan war paint designs. Images created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Quaritch and Varang vs. Top Dollar and Myca

In 2021, I wrote an editorial analyzing the toxic relationship of Top Dollar and Myca from The Crow. One of the takeaways from that editorial was that Myca and Top Dollar’s incestuous relationship is likely the result of an absent/dysfunctional family unit, as well as likely being exposed to dark and harmful things from a young age by their father. Another major takeaway was how Top Dollar and Myca’s enablement of each other was contributed by their likely long-term exposure to dark and harmful things being their “normal”. But when I wrote and published that editorial five years ago, I didn’t realize how Myca and Top Dollar lacked awareness for who they are and what they do, which kept them in a constant cycle of toxicity. When Varang shares her traumatic past with Quaritch in Avatar: Fire and Ash, she recollects what caused her to become the leader she is and how the Mangkwan clan responded to the tragedy. Varang expressing self-awareness doesn’t excuse or condone her aggressive and violent behavior toward others. However, it shows that change, as well as healing, seems realistically possible for her. Varang’s steps toward healing consist of a) she willingly opened up to Quaritch about her traumatic past and b) she willingly opened up her heart to Quaritch after closing her heart off for so long, to the point where it dictated how she walked. Oona even commented on how Varang’s walk was developed, saying, “Varang’s trust is broken and so what happens when you close the heart”. Only time will tell if Varang wants to heal from her trauma, let alone change her villainous ways.

This awareness of Varang’s trauma is also acknowledged by the creative team behind Avatar: Fire and Ash. During an interview with Youtuber Bryce Edward Brown, James Cameron (the director of all three Avatar films) said, “I think that as a little girl the powerlessness and the loss and that she felt and and is playing out through PTSD and trying to recapture power and control the things that that she couldn’t control as a child”. When Oona was interviewed by Bryce Edward Brown, she explained, “The reason that she [Varang] is the way that she is is because she has been hurt in a really really deep place. And it’s, like, the classic, you know, architype of ‘hurt people hurt people’”. In an interview with ABC News, Oona addressed how “She’s [Varang’s] gone through a lot of trauma”, elaborating on that statement by saying, “But she’s gone though a lot of grief, you know, she lost her land, her whole way of life, her family, and, and, her great mother, the, the source of all of her faith, so she has suffered a lot of loss”.

The picture on the left shows how Varang walks, influenced by her broken trust. The picture on the right shows Varang demonstrating to Quaritch how she is “the fire”. During this demonstration, anger toward Eywa can be heard in Varang’s voice. Images created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

One of the reasons why Varang is considered a villain in Avatar: Fire and Ash is because she uses her kuru (neural queue/braid) to forcefully connect to other Na’vis’ kurus, using that connection to mentally manipulate her victims. Based on the context within the film, she does this as a form of interrogation as well as to gain an upper hand. After Varang and Quaritch become a couple, however, Quaritch has stood back and watched Varang continue to mentally manipulate others with her kuru. Initially, I was confused why Quaritch would do this, especially considering a) Varang mentally manipulated him when they first met and b) Varang willingly opened up to him about her traumatic past, as well as expressing self-awareness for why she is the way that she is. I wondered, “shouldn’t Quaritch be trying to help Varang heal from her trauma”? This confusion led me, at first, to speculate if Quaritch had adopted Top Dollar and Myca’s “I don’t care because it’s none of my business” attitude/mindset, the same attitude/mindset they used to enable each other to hurt themselves or other people. But Quaritch is the same man who has gone out of his way to try to understand Varang and the world around her. In Bridgehead City, when General Ardmore called the Mangkwan clan “savages” and Varang Quaritch’s “little missy”, Quaritch (and Varang) appeared uncomfortable by what General Ardmore said. Quaritch even tells General Ardmore, “Don’t be a jackass, General”. What I said shows how Quaritch does care about Varang and her world because he’s made that his business. Though there are better ways Quaritch could have shown he cares about Varang, like preventing her from using her kuru for harmful purposes.

These collection of pictures show Quaritch and Varang’ do not look pleased what General Ardmore said about Varang and the Mangkwan clan. Images created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

In an interview from the Youtube channel, Film Stories, Stephen responds to a question about where Quaritch fits in within the conflict of humanity versus Na’vi. He says, “What he [Quaritch] recognizes is that he can no longer, the idea of making the planet come to him, the moon come to him doesn’t work. He’s got to go to it. He’s got to adapt to it”. Stephen’s quote can be applied to Quaritch’s relationship with Varang. Varang willingly opened up to Quaritch about her traumatic past, as well as willingly opened up her heart to him. During his interaction with Varang in her yurt, Quaritch reminds her how she wants an “equal” (something she’s never had). With that said, he recognizes how Varang has not only carried her unresolved trauma for a long time, but has also lived her life a certain way for a long time. Quaritch recognizes as well how Varang’s new chapter in her life (developing a relationship with her “equal”) will take some adjusting to. So, as Varang’s “equal”, Quaritch’s decision to stand by and watch her continue to mentally manipulate others with her kuru is not about intentional enablement like Myca and Top Dollar not caring about what the other does. Quaritch acknowledges and respects where Varang is in her life, as well as her healing journey, and meeting her there instead of forcing her to do something she either doesn’t want to do or isn’t ready to do. However, I do wish Quaritch had intervened and encouraged Varang to make better choices that don’t involve hurting other Na’vis.

In these two photos, Varang continues to mentally manipulate Na’vis with her kuru. Meanwhile, Quaritch just stand by and watches the events unfold instead of intervening. Images created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

When I wrote and published my editorial about Top Dollar and Myca’s relationship, I discussed how both their conversations in The Crow were not meaningful. As I explained in that editorial, words aren’t utilized to address emotions, leaving feelings and personal turmoil bottled up and unresolved. Concerns and basic needs are ignored as well. In Avatar: Fire and Ash, Varang and Quaritch share only one conversation, which takes place during their interaction in Varang’s yurt. Despite this, their conversation is meaningful because of how much it accomplishes. Like I’ve already said, Varang willingly opened up to Quaritch about her traumatic past, showing how she not only trusts Quaritch, but also how change and healing seem realistically possible for her. Varang sharing her backstory allows Quaritch (and the audience) to learn more about her as well. Meanwhile, Varang learns more about Quaritch by asking him questions, such as why he came to see her in the first place. Even when Quaritch tells Varang, “You want to take on Eywa? You need me”, he confirms how he’s actively paying attention/listening to what Varang is saying. However, he was under the influence of a hallucinogenic powder she gave him earlier in their interaction, potentially affecting his judgement. But the most important thing Quaritch and Varang’s conversation accomplishes is establishing their relationship. They no longer see each other as a threat like they did when they first met. As their conversation goes on, their tone of voice becomes friendlier. Varang even gently strokes Quaritch’s chin and kuru, though she did cut his chest prior to that, which could have given Quaritch mixed messages on her feelings for him. But when Varang tells Quaritch, “I see you”, he responds by telling her, “Damn right you do”, while appearing relaxed and speaking with a confident and matter-of-fact tone of voice. This response, and the fact Quaritch doesn’t appear surprised or caught off guard by what Varang told him, emphasizes his acceptance of her love, as well as doubling and tripling down on that idea.

The top two pictures show Varang gently stroking Quaritch’s chin and kuru. The bottom left picture shows Varang right after she told Quaritch, “I see you”. Meanwhile, the bottom right picture shows Quaritch right he tells Varang, “Damn right you do”. Images created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Varang and Quaritch vs. Akasha and Lestat

I wrote an editorial in 2019 about Lestat and Akasha’s relationship (from Queen of the Damned), discussing why it was problematic for Akasha to possess more control in the relationship. One of her missteps was not making an effort to get to know Lestat. Akasha assumes she knows Lestat based on his image as a musical performer, even though being a musical performer only plays a small role in his life. This assumption leads her to give him a royal title he did not desire. Had Akasha taken the time to ask Lestat what he wanted, she would have known all he wanted was to walk in the light and not hide in the shadows. In Avatar: Fire and Ash, Varang doesn’t make Akasha’s mistakes. I brought up earlier how she learns more about Quaritch by asking him questions, such as why he came to see her in the first place. Varang even asks him, “What do I want”, when Quaritch claims she doesn’t want to keep him as a slave. Her asking this question shows how she’s interested in hearing his answer instead of assuming what he’ll say is incorrect. It also shows how she’s willing to change her mind about how she sees Quaritch, though her entertaining the idea of keeping him as a slave is concerning. Before giving Quaritch the hallucinogenic powder I referenced earlier in this editorial, Varang tells him, “First, I must see your soul”. Then, before telling Quaritch, “You have a strong heart. No fear”, Varang says, “Only true words will come from your tongue”. These examples illustrate Varang making a strong effort in getting to know Quaritch instead of falling for a fabricated image of him. Sadly, this is the only time Varang is shown learning more about Quaritch, which could give the impression her efforts aren’t strong.

The left picture shows Varang as she’s asking Quaritch, “What do I want”. The picture on the right shows Varang asking Quaritch questions. That picture is from Quaritch’s perspective while under the influence of the hallucinogenic powder she gave him. Images created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Akasha doesn’t seem to see Lestat as an equal, but instead as something she can control. Akasha refers to Lestat by his name on less than three occasions. She also talks at him, not to him, as well as purposefully leaving Lestat out of the process of building their “kingdom”. Because Akasha forced Lestat into their relationship and possesses more control within it, he doesn’t feel their relationship is worth investing in. Once again, Varang refuses to repeat Akasha’s mistakes. In Avatar: Fire and Ash, when Quaritch brought up how she wanted an “equal”, Varang never objects or claims Quaritch is wrong. In fact, she tells him “I see you” after he reveals how an “equal” is what she really wanted. Any time she communicates with Quaritch (talking to him, not at him), Varang refers to him by his name. The only times she didn’t do that is when she didn’t know his name, hence the reason why she called Quaritch “Sky Man”. Since forming their relationship, Varang and Quaritch are rarely seen apart, as they recognize how valuable their time and company is. This is just one example of how their relationship contains equal investment. Meanwhile, Quaritch shows how he is an active participant in his relationship with Varang. In Avatar: Fire and Ash, during his interaction with Varang in her yurt, Quaritch explains what he can give her, such as “guns”, “comms”, and “RPGs”. But Varang recognizes the nontangible things he can give her as well, like security and peace of mind. This portion of their conversation highlights how Quaritch is willing to share and be a provider in his and Varang’s relationship. As I’ve said, Quaritch tries to learn more about Varang and her world. Because Varang has willingly provided these learning opportunities to Quaritch, he has received chances to grow closer to her.

Varang’s response to Quartich’s reminder of how she wants an “equal” doesn’t show her disagreeing with him. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

While reflecting on Lestat and Akasha’s relationship, as well as the other relationships discussed in this editorial, I noticed how their displays of affection are not consistent, whether these displays have been publicly or privately. It seems like that decision was made to emphasize those couples’ problematic behavior. But when Quaritch and Varang’s relationship is established, their displays of affection are shown more consistently in Avatar: Fire and Ash. Varang and Quaritch hold hands on two separate occasions: in Bridgehead City (after Quaritch introduces Varang to General Ardmore) and after Quaritch teaches Varang how to use a flamethrower. Quaritch has referred to Varang by endearing names like “baby”, “sugar”, and “darling”. Any time he touches her, Quaritch has continually been gentle with Varang. Meanwhile, Varang gently touched Quaritch’s arm in Bridgehead City. As I mentioned in this editorial already, Varang gently strokes Quaritch’s chin and kuru, which she does before Quaritch brought up how Varang wants an “equal”. But what I’ve noticed is how Varang only blinks whenever Quaritch is around or when something connected to Quaritch is around. Because this behavior is so patterned around Quaritch, I believe blinking is Varang’s way of showing affection for him. These times are the following:

  • While examining the deceased body of one of the Mangkwan Na’vi, Varang becomes interested in a bullet lodged within it. After digging out the bullet, Varang blinks as she bites into the bullet. Bullets typically come from the RDA, which Quaritch is associated with.
  • After Quaritch teaches Varang how to use a gun, she blinks as she tells him, “I do not need you now, Sky Man”.
  • Varang blinks as she notices the guns Quaritch brought to her Mangkwan village
  • Varang blinks immediately after Quaritch reminds her how she wants an “equal”
  • When Jake surrenders to Quaritch, Varang blinks three times during that situation: when Quaritch suggests Neytiri be arrested too, right before Jake refers to Varang as Quaritch’s “new girlfriend” and once as Varang is looking up at Quaritch
  • Varang blinks twice when Quaritch introduces her to General Ardmore: when General Ardmore refers to Varang as Quaritch’s “little missy” and as Quaritch is introducing Varang as “Tsahìk of the Mangkwan”
  • When Neytiri infiltrates Varang’s tent in the Mangkwan clan’s camp in Bridgehead City, Varang blinks when Neytiri threatens to cut off Varang’s kuru. This incident takes place after Varang and Quaritch formed a tsaheylu (an intimate bond that lasts for life formed by mates connecting kurus). When Quaritch and Varang first met, she forcefully connected his kuru with hers in order to mentally manipulate him. However, an argument can be made that, in this particular situation, Varang did this in self-defense, as Quaritch had a gun pointed at her head.
These photos are from when Quaritch teaches Varang how to use a flamethrower. Quaritch’s hand is circled to emphasize how he gently touches Varang. Images created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
In this picture, Varang’s hand is circled to emphasize how gently she’s touching Quaritch’s arm. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
Varang and Quartich’s hands are circled to highlight that Quaritch and Varang are holding hands. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Quaritch and Varang vs. Oscar and Lily

One of the worst movies I ever reviewed on 18 Cinema Lane is Twentieth Century. A reason why I don’t like this movie is how abusive Oscar and Lily’s relationship is. Oscar grows jealous and obsessive of Lily over the course of the film. The worst thing he does is use his mortality as a manipulation tactic. Not only does Oscar threaten suicide if Lily doesn’t stay with him, he also fakes his death to trick Lily into signing his contract. Quaritch and Varang, on the other hand, never do that in Avatar: Fire and Ash. The only time Quaritch uses language to manipulate a situation is when he tells Varang, “You touch me with that thing again, I’ll kill you”. Before he said that, Varang was attempting to mentally manipulate Quaritch with her kuru for a second time, even though he came to her village delivering guns for her people. Therefore, Quaritch’s threat was a self-defense tactic, as he still saw Varang as a threat. It should be noted how Varang also still saw Quaritch as a threat during this interaction, as Varang continues to hold her kuru. This is a response to Quaritch holding a gun to her head when they first met, as he was trying to help Jake rescue his children from the Mangkwan clan. Meanwhile, during Quaritch and Varang’s interaction in her yurt, Varang’s mortality is never a topic of discussion. Even though she could have used her mortality to manipulate Quaritch, she instead chooses to share her traumatic past with him, as well as asking him why he came to see her in the first place.

Varang’s kuru in her hand is circled in this picture to emphasize how, in this moment, she still sees Quaritch as a threat after their first meeting. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Despite being treated horribly by Oscar, Oscar’s friends try to help him fix his relationship with Lily. They even go as far as blaming Lily for Oscar’s failures. Varang and Quaritch never do that either in Avatar: Fire and Ash. When Neytiri infiltrated the Mangkwan clan’s camp in Bridgehead City, Varang is more preoccupied with obtaining Neytiri’s heart than blaming Quaritch for the camp’s breach in security. Later in the movie, when General Ardmore permanently grounds Quaritch after Jake and another character named Spider escape Bridgehead City, Quaritch doesn’t blame Varang. Instead, he stays focused on recapturing Spider and Jake. Quaritch is even pleased he can utilize Varang mentally manipulating Neytiri to lure Jake and Spider, with Quaritch telling Varang, “Thanks, baby”. These examples I brought up show how Varang and Quaritch don’t take their frustrations out on each other because they possess the maturity and emotional understanding to recognize which battles are worth choosing, as well as what is within that other person’s control. At the same time, however, Quaritch and Varang don’t hold each other accountable if they do something wrong.

Even when Quaritch shows up help capture Neytiri, Varang remains focused on obtaining Neytiri’s heart. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
After Quaritch uses Varang’s mental manipulation toward Neytiri to lure Jake and Spider, he tells Varang, “Thanks, baby”. But he doesn’t hold her accountable for her treatment toward Neytiri. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Varang and Quaritch vs. Nancy and Bill Sikes

Though I have reviewed 1968’s Oliver!, I never talked about how awful Nancy and Bill Sikes’ relationship is. Similar to Lestat and Akasha’s relationship, Nancy is more invested in her relationship with Bill. But, unlike Akasha and Lestat’s relationship, Bill is someone Nancy actually cares about. Unfortunately for her, Bill sees Nancy more as a nuisance than a girlfriend. When she asks Bill if he loves her, he angrily tells Nancy, “Course I do. I live with you, don’t I”? Bill also takes Nancy for granted, never showing gratitude whenever Nancy does something nice for him, like serving him food. He even becomes violent toward Nancy. Bill tries to physically intimidate Nancy by threatening to choke her when she refuses to bring Oliver back into a life of thieving. Bill also slaps Nancy so hard, she falls to the floor. After Nancy is beaten to death by Bill, Bill blames her for the predicament he put himself in. He expresses more concern for being caught by the police than remorse for the way he treated Nancy.

As he makes his way back to his and Varang’s tent, Quaritch says, “Hey sugar, join the party”. This highlights how he wants to spend more time with her. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Quaritch is never shown becoming angry at Varang. Even when Varang mentally manipulated him with her kuru or cut his chest, Quaritch doesn’t express anger or resentment toward her. However, Quaritch ignoring Varang’s aggression toward him could give her a mixed message on how to treat him. Quaritch has continually been gentle with Varang any time he touches her. In fact, the closest to aggressive Quaritch has ever been toward Varang is when he pointed a gun at her head. In that moment, however, Quaritch saw her as a threat, as Quaritch was trying to help Jake rescue his children from the Mangkwan clan. Throughout his relationship with Varang, Quaritch never takes her for granted, proving this by taking the time to learn more about Varang and her world. Out of all the ways he could have chosen to spend his time in Bridgehead City, Quaritch chose to spend it with Varang and the Mangkwan clan. What I said about Quaritch can also be applied to Varang. She stops being aggressive toward Quaritch when their relationship is established, as Varang saw Quaritch as a threat before that. Varang doesn’t take Quaritch for granted either, with her proof being how interested she appears in learning how to use a gun and flamethrower. Quaritch and Varang are rarely seen apart when their relationship is formed. They recognize how valuable their time and company is.

These two pictures show Quaritch’s response to Varang’s aggression toward him. Though he holds no anger or resentment towards Varang, Quartich choosing to ignore her aggression could give mixed messages. Images created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
These two photos show how interested and eager she is to learn from Quaritch. Image created by 20th Century Studios, Lightstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Conclusion

What led to the creation of this editorial was trying to figure out why Quaritch and Varang were so popular. Through my research, I think I found an answer. In the Avatar franchise, Varang and Quaritch seem to be the only two characters who subvert expectations. In entertainment media, when expectations are subverted, that can spark curiosity and intrigue from the audience. If you had told me back in 2009 that Colonel Miles Quaritch would eventually adopt the appearance of a Na’vi and fall in love with a Na’vi woman, I definitely would not have believed you. Then, in 2025, if you had told me the first Na’vi villain in the Avatar franchise would fall in love at all, let alone fall in love with Quaritch, I also would not have believed you. But, before publishing this editorial, if you had told me Quaritch and Varang’s relationship was healthier than some of the problematic relationships from movies and tv I’m familiar with (like Lestat and Akasha and Top Dollar and Myca), I certainly would have thought you were joking.

My editorial outro image created by me, Sally Silverscreen. Original image created by 20th Century Studios, Lighstorm Entertainment, TSG Entertainment, Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

Though this editorial highlights how Quaritch and Varang’s relationship is healthier than some problematic relationships from entertainment media, their relationship isn’t truly healthy. Because they are the villains in Avatar: Fire and Ash, their villainous behavior is on full display. They treat other people terribly, from Quaritch destroying Na’vis’ homes in his search for Jake Sully to Varang and the Mangkwan clan sparking unprovoked violence toward other Na’vis. There are also a lot of aspects of their relationship that are up for interpretation. I mentioned earlier how Varang and Quaritch formed a life-long bond called tsaheylu. Even though Varang is more educated about Na’vi culture than Quaritch, it’s unknown if she explained the significance of tsaheylu before they formed this bond, which would have allowed Quaritch to make an informed decision about whether he wants to spend the rest of his life with her. Despite the flaws in their relationship, however, Quaritch and Varang treat each other better than I expected. As of the publication of my editorial, the fourth film in the Avatar franchise has not officially been greenlit, though the release date has already been chosen. If that film does come to fruition, I hope Varang and Quaritch acknowledge how good they have it when it comes to their relationship. Because if my editorial stresses anything, it’s how some people aren’t so lucky.

References:

From 18 Cinema Lane –

Travel Lessons I Learned from Movies and TV

Toxic Valentine: Why Lestat and Akasha’s relationship is very problematic in Queen of the Damned (2002)

We Need to Talk About the Toxic Relationship of Top Dollar and Myca from ‘The Crow’

Take 3: Twentieth Century Review

Youtube Videos and Shorts –

‘Why Varang Is Working With Quaritch and the Humans of the RDA in James Cameron’s Avatar’ (short from Youtube channel, Bryce Edward Brown)

‘I Interviewed Stephen Lang and Oona Chaplin About Quaritch and Varang’s Future in Avatar’ (video from Youtube channel, Bryce Edward Brown)

‘Candid interview with James Cameron and cast of ‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’’ (video from Youtube channel, ABC News)

‘Stephen Lang on AVATAR: FIRE AND ASH!’ (video from Youtube channel, Film Stories)

Articles –

https://screenrant.com/how-quaritch-returns-in-avatar-way-of-water-explained/

https://james-camerons-avatar.fandom.com/wiki/Varang

https://james-camerons-avatar.fandom.com/wiki/Miles_Quaritch_(Recombinant)

https://james-camerons-avatar.fandom.com/wiki/Miles_Quaritch

Films and Television –

Avatar franchise (Avatar, Avatar: The Way of Water, Avatar: Fire and Ash)

Oliver!

Lost: Season 3, Episode 9 — ‘Stranger in a Strange Land’

Take 3: The Misfits (1961) Review

Marilyn Monroe is a woman who needs no introduction. One of the most popular actresses of all time, almost everyone knows who Marilyn is, even if they’ve never seen any of her movies. I remember a time when I would go to a store and find memorabilia with Marilyn’s picture or likeness on it, from metal wall signs to Christmas ornaments. I even recall a church named after her in the 1975 movie, Tommy. But when the Marilyn Monroe – 100th Birthday Anniversary Blogathon was announced, I remembered one of her films was recommended to me. That film is 1961’s The Misfits, suggested by Eric Binford (from Diary of a Movie Maniac)! On my blog’s Year-Long Bingo Card, one of the squares is labeled “Review a movie from the Western genre”. This became another reason why I chose to review The Misfits, as the movie is classified as a “contemporary western”. However, I had no idea Marilyn ever starred in a western genre picture until I selected the 1961 title for the blogathon. My aforementioned reasons, including the fact I don’t review western genre movies often, finally gave me an opportunity to write about The Misfits!

The Misfits (1961) poster created by United Artists and Seven Arts Productions

Things I liked about the film:

The acting: Throughout my years of watching and reviewing movies, I’ve heard Marilyn Monroe receive titles like “icon” and “sex symbol”. But as I reflect on her performance in The Misfits, I feel those titles do her acting talents a huge disservice. Toward the beginning of the 1961 film, Marilyn’s character, Roslyn, is questioning what her life will look like after her recent divorce. She’s hunched over her drink and her hands are folded, appearing as if she’s lost in thought. Roslyn’s eyes show how she’s trying to make a thousand decisions in a single moment, but not in a way that makes her look overwhelmed. She’s carefully processing what her new steps will be, coming up with a strategy that will prevent her from repeating her mistakes. As I watched this scene unfold, I was so focused on Roslyn and what decisions she was going to make, I had completely forgotten I was watching an actress portray a character. This is just one example of how Marilyn’s performance was one of the best parts of The Misfits!

Clark Gable is an actor I am definitely familiar with. Not only have I seen Gone with the Wind, I reviewed China Seas back in 2021. His portrayal of Gaylord in The Misfits is quite different from his two previously mentioned roles. That’s because it didn’t feel like Gaylord had something to prove, yet was emotionally versatile. One of the saddest scenes is when Gaylord is trying to find his children. As he drunkenly stumbles throughout and out of the saloon, he calls out his children’s names. A mixture of pain, confusion, and longing can be heard in his voice. Even his eyes were filled to the brim with sadness. In that scene, I, honestly, couldn’t help feeling sorry for Gaylord. Clark’s solid performance certainly contributed to that.

While I’m on the subject of the acting performances in The Misfits, I want to bring up Eli Wallach and Montgomery Clift. As I watched this movie, I was impressed by Eli’s portrayal of Gaylord’s friend, Guido, as well as Montgomery’s portrayal of a rodeo rider named Perce. One stand-out moment was when Guido is talking to Roslyn about his deceased wife. His voice quivers during the conversation and his eyes even appear on the verge of tears. Eli’s performance presents one of those times where a character can say so much as they say very little. In a different conversation with Roslyn, Perce shares his life story with her. Throughout his reflections, his wide eyes look like they’re searching for something. But it’s not because he’s lost, it’s because he’s trying to find something to focus on after a recent head injury. Montgomery’s expressive eyes are one of the reasons why his performance was captivating to watch!

The dialogue: Sometimes, a movie’s dialogue can be so thoughtfully written, it sounds profound without trying too hard to be. That was definitely the case for The Misfits! Honestly, it’s difficult to choose a favorite quote because several quotes were so thought-provoking. But I will provide a few examples to prove my previously stated point. At one moment in the movie, Isabelle, Roslyn’s former landlady and current friend, claims to know Nevada’s slogan. She says it’s “Anything goes, but don’t complain if it went”. Poignant reminders of how unpredictable life is and how some things were or were not meant to be are shared in that one line. During a conversation with Roslyn, Guido tells her, “You have the gift for life, Roslyn. The rest of us, we’re just looking for a place to hide and watch it all go by”. This piece of dialogue simply, yet effectively, differentiates between people who allow life to pass them by and those who fearlessly grab the steering wheel.

Providing creativity to the western genre: When it comes to means of travel within the western genre, horseback riding, horse drawn carriages/wagons, and trains are typically shown on screen. These modes of travel provide a stone in the western genre’s foundation, making the genre itself what it is. But what if I told you there was a plane in The Misfits? In the 1961 movie, Guido says he was a pilot in the war, likely referring to World War II. He uses his piloting skills to not only fly a plane, but to also wrangle a group of wild horses with that same plane. I bring this up because, prior to reviewing The Misfits, I had never seen, let alone heard of, a plane in a western genre film. Incorporating any aircraft into the movie added creativity to the western genre. It also gave The Misfits a unique identity.

Marilyn Monroe – 100th Birthday Anniversary Blogathon banner created by Kristen from Hoofers and Honeys

What I didn’t like about the film:

Guido’s unaddressed jealousy: At Guido’s house, Roslyn and Gaylord share a dance together. When Guido sees Gaylord and Roslyn together, the look on Guido’s face appears to be that of jealousy. But throughout The Misfits, this apparent jealousy wasn’t addressed. I honestly thought it was going to lead to a love triangle or Guido and Gaylord fighting for Roslyn’s love. Looking back on the 1961 movie, I wonder what the purpose was of showing Guido looking jealous if that feeling didn’t play a role in the story? Guido’s apparent jealousy could have led to an interesting conflict within the script had that feeling been acknowledged.

The run-time: IMDB lists The Misfits’ run-time as a little over two hours. Personally, I think that run-time is a bit excessive. Not only is the story pretty straightforward and easier to follow, the cast is smaller, which helps the audience remember who is who. These elements should have led to a tighter script. Plus, some scenes were drawn out too long, such as when Gaylord, Guido, and Perce wrangle the wild horses. If scenes like the one I brought up were trimmed down, the run-time of The Misfits could (and should) have been, at least, an hour and thirty to forty minutes. Important points in the story could have been reached sooner as well.

Perce’s underutilized backstory: In my opinion, Perce was the most interesting character in The Misfits. His backstory, along with his phone conversation with his mother, made him intriguing. I was genuinely curious about where Perce’s part of the story would go. But, unfortunately, his backstory became underutilized. During a conversation with Roslyn, Perce brings up how he was denied inheriting his father’s ranch. This could have provided Perce with a motive to carry his story forward. After his conversation with Roslyn, however, this detail is barely brought up again. In fact, Perce’s backstory becomes an afterthought as the movie progresses.

Joshua Tree National Park in California image created by Welcomia at freepik.com. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/tree”>Tree photo created by welcomia – http://www.freepik.com</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

My overall impression:

Have you ever watched a movie where you didn’t know what the movie’s creative team was trying to say? That was my experience watching The Misfits. I think I know what the film was supposed to tell me. But I don’t know for certain if that’s what The Misfits’ creative team wanted to tell their audience. However, I don’t believe the 1961 movie is bad. In fact, I thought it was just ok. The acting performances, including Marilyn Monroe’s, were certainly worth watching. Not only was the dialogue, at times, thought-provoking, the inclusion of a plane added creativity to the western genre. But there were flaws that held The Misfits back from being a stronger movie. I didn’t like how Perce’s backstory was underutilized and how Guido’s jealousy was unaddressed. Plus, the run-time was, in my opinion, a bit excessive. Despite those flaws, I am thankful to have received an opportunity to finally watch (and review) The Misfits!

Overall score: 6 out of 10

Have you seen The Misfits? Which film from Marilyn Monroe’s filmography would you like to see me review next? Let me know in the comment section!

Have fun at the movies!

Sally Silverscreen

Comparing with the Critics – 1986 – Introduction

Any fan of Eddie Munson from Stranger Things knows 1986 is “Eddie’s year”. So, when I dedicated this year’s blogathon to the fortieth anniversary of “Eddie’s year” and since it’s been a while since I last reviewed a movie for one of my blogathons, I decided to make up for lost time by reviewing a “best” and “worst” movie for my Comparing with the Critics series! When it came to selecting titles to write about, I took a different approach; asking myself, “What would Eddie choose”? Had he received an opportunity to make a guest appearance on Siskel & Ebert & the Movies, I’m not sure how many of Eddie’s choices would overlap with Gene Siskel’s and/or Roger Ebert’s year-end selections. Based on the films Roger and Gene did pick, however, I think I know what Eddie would choose. If Eddie’s story teaches anything, it’s that, sometimes, there’s more than meets the eye. His imagination and creativity not only works in his favor as a Dungeon Master, it’s also helped his friends during their time in the Upside Down. So, for the Best of 1986, I have selected The Fly! As for the Worst of 1986, I have chosen King Kong Lives. I believe Eddie would see Roger’s and Gene’s warnings about the movie as a challenge.

Comparing with the Critics banner created by me, Sally Silverscreen. TV show title cards created by WTTW National Productions, WTTW, Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), Lifetime Television, Tribune Entertainment, Buena Vista Television, and Disney-ABC Domestic Television

Take 3: Titan A.E. (2000) Review

Participating in this month’s Genre Grandeur feels, to me, like déjà vu. That’s because the theme is “Movies Featuring Reluctant Heroes”, the same theme (and month) when I participated in Genre Grandeur back in 2020. Back then, I reviewed the 2014 film, Captain Sabertooth and the Treasure of Lama Rama. That movie ended up being the most disappointing one I saw that year. For this month’s (and year’s) Genre Grandeur, I decided to select 2000’s Titan A.E., a title I actually have seen before. However, it’s been so long since I’ve seen it, I have vague recollections of the film. On my blog’s Year-Long Bingo Card, there are two squares labeled “Review an animated film” and “Science Fiction”. That, along with how Titan A.E. fits this month’s Genre Grandeur theme, gave me an excuse to revisit the 26-year-old movie!

Titan A.E. (2000) poster created by 20th Century Fox Animation, David Kirschner Productions, Fox Animation Studios, 20th Century Fox, and Walt Disney Studios

Things I liked about the film:

The use of color: As I said in the introduction of this review, I have vague recollections of Titan A.E. because it’s been so long since I’ve seen the film. Because of that, I’d forgotten how colorful this movie is. Using color, as well as understanding how to use color, can contribute to a movie’s visual appeal. With the creative team behind Titan A.E. possessing and executing that understanding, the film’s visual appeal was achieved! In one beautiful example, Cale and his team travel to a planet called Sesharrim. As they sail through the planet, they are greeted by a landscape of rich reds. The deep purple waters are right under bright yellow balloons of light. The combination of hues on Sesharrim created an environment promoting peace and serenity.

Incorporation of clever ideas: At the beginning of Titan A.E., Cale (the film’s protagonist and reluctant hero) receives a gold ring from his father before they part ways. Since that moment, Cale (as well as the audience) believes this ring is, simply, a treasured memento. But when he meets a character named Joseph Korso, Cale learns his ring provides a map to a life-saving spacecraft called Titan. Cale receives another surprise when he discovers his ring also contains a compass. The movie’s “MacGuffin” is Titan, as the characters spend most of the story looking for it. But in stories like Titan A.E., so much focus in placed on the “MacGuffin” itself, the bridge to the “MacGuffin” is usually overlooked. In the 2000 film, however, Cale’s ring becomes a tool used to help the characters reach their goal. The purpose of Cale’s ring was not only such a clever idea for a simple piece of jewelry, it’s just one example of the incorporation of clever ideas in Titan A.E.!

Blend of 2-D and 3-D animation: Titan A.E.’s claim to fame is blending 2-D animation (hand-drawn animation) and 3-D animation (computer created images). This major creative decision brought something unique to the table of animation, as well as film! What it also did was visually complement the story’s conflict. In the world of Titan A.E., the Drejs are a villainous group of aliens who want to control the universe by outnumbering the humans. The Drejs are presented as bright blue, 3-D animated characters, while the human characters were created with 2-D animation. In one example, after Cale meets Korso, the Drejs track Cale down. Because the majority of that scene is presented through 2-D animation, it forces the audience to focus on the Drejs, with their color and animated appearance highlighting their distinctness. But what that scene also shows is how the blend of 2-D and 3-D animation gave Titan A.E. visual depth.

Colorful galaxy image created by Freepik at freepik.com. <a href=’https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/lovely-hand-drawn-galaxy-background_2943080.htm’>Designed by Freepik</a>. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/background”>Background vector created by Freepik</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

What I didn’t like about the film:

The Drejs: Like I already mentioned in my review, the Drejs are a villainous group of aliens who want to outnumber the humans. But while I was watching Titan A.E., I never felt they were a strong threat to Cale and his team. That’s because the Drejs had such a limited presence in the film. In fact, their presence was so limited, it felt like the Drejs appeared in the movie for the sake of plot convenience. These flaws prevented the Drejs from being effective villains.

The run-time: According to IMDB, Titan A.E.’s run-time is an hour and thirty-four minutes. As I watched the movie, however, it felt a bit longer than its run-time. The reason for this is how a few scenes were unnecessarily drawn out. For example, a scene where Cale is driving a spacecraft in a non-dangerous environment seemed to last about five minutes. While the scene contained plot development, most of the scene felt like padding. Had that scene been trimmed down, its intended point could have been reached sooner. The script could have been a bit tighter as well.

Inconsistent character development: In any story, character development is an important component. This part of storytelling allows the audience to truly get to know the characters, which gives them a reason to stay invested in what the characters are doing on screen. When it came to the human characters in Titan A.E., I thought the character development was well done, as I learned more about them as the movie went on. But when it came to the alien characters, like Gune and Stith, I felt like I only became familiar with them. The inconsistent character development in Titan A.E. not only prevented me from truly getting to know every member of Cale’s team, the camaraderie between these characters wasn’t as strong as it could have been.

Movie items image created by Freepik at freepik.com. <a href=’https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/flat-modern-cinema-elements_847506.htm’>Designed by Freepik</a>. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/frame”>Frame vector created by Freepik</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

My overall impression:

When a movie performs poorly at the box office, one of the potential reasons may be it was “ahead of its time”. If someone wanted to apply this reasoning to Titan A.E., I’d buy that reasoning at full price. As I mentioned in this review, the 2000 presentation is known for blending 2-D animation (hand-drawn animation) and 3-D animation (computer created images). Even though this creative risk hurt the film’s financial earnings, it did show the world the possibilities animation (let alone filmmaking) had to offer. It also showed how 2-D and 3-D animation can complete one another instead of compete against each other. Though looking at how the cinematic landscape has changed in twenty-six years, 3-D animation has become so common, 2-D animation has ended up becoming scarce. As for my opinion of Titan A.E., I thought it was a fine, interesting enough movie. But for all the reasons I brought up, I believe this film deserves more love and appreciation.

Overall score: 7.2 out of 10

Have you seen Titan A.E.? Which underrated animated movie do you wish received more love and appreciation? Let me know in the comment section!

Have fun at the movies!

Sally Silverscreen

Take 3: Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery Review

Since 2023, when I reviewed Carrot Cake Murder: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, I have expressed my frustrations over the re-brand of the Murder, She Baked/Hannah Swensen series. It got to the point where, by the time I wrote about Reality Bites: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, I wasn’t looking forward to future installments. But that started to change when I saw Pie To Die For: A Hannah Swensen Mystery. Even though the movie was just ok, it was slightly better than its predecessor. Then, when I reviewed Sugar & Vice: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, I found that film ok as well. As I learned about another chapter in the series, Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, I was ready to discuss the film with an open mind! Would that movie be ok like the previous two chapters? Keep reading my review to find out!

Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery poster created by Hallmark Media and Hallmark Channel

Things I liked about the film:

Incorporation of Delores’ private investigation business: When I talked about One Bad Apple: A Hannah Swensen Mystery in my list of the worst movies I saw in 2024, I criticized the creative decision of allowing Delores to become a private investigator. At the time, I believed this creative choice went against Delores’ character, especially after spending years objecting to Hannah getting involved in cases. But in Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, Delores’ role as a private investigator made sense within the context of the story. One of the plots of this chapter is a court case involving fraudulent coins. Not only did Chad use Delores’ evidence in the case, Delores also testified during the case’s trial. Along with making sense, incorporating Delores’ private investigation business into Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery gave Delores more involvement in, at least, one area of the script.

Michelle’s wardrobe: Since her debut in Sweet Revenge: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, Hannah’s younger sister, Michelle, has been known for being a free-spirited and creative woman. These personality traits have been reflected through her wardrobe, with Michelle’s wardrobe in Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery being no exception! When Michelle visits The Cookie Jar (Hannah’s bakery), she wears an outfit consisting of a black shirt, black leather jacket, a short yellow plaid skirt, black tights, and black boots. Michelle even wore a pair of yellow smiley face earrings, providing a nice bridge between the black and yellow hues of the outfit. During another trip to The Cookie Jar, Michelle’s outfit boasts a brown and white color combination. But this time, she wears an ensemble made up of a long brown and white cow print skirt, a white shirt, brown sweater, and brown boots. Earrings were, once again, the statement accessory. However, Michelle’s earrings looked like cowgirl boots. Kelsey Baran, the costume designer of Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, did a great job putting together attire that complements both Michelle and the actress who portrays her, Tess Atkins!

Utilizing Hannah’s “quirk”: I’ve mentioned in the past how detectives in pop culture, especially those that are more well-known, have a “quirk”. This “quirk” helps set fictional detectives apart from other fictional detectives, whether it’s a catchphrase, special interest, or having a signature style. However, a “quirk” isn’t always utilized in solving cases. Hannah has gained a reputation for being a respected baker, as well as the successful proprietor of her bakery, The Cookie Jar, setting the Murder, She Baked/Hannah Swensen series apart from other Hallmark mystery series. From what I remember, though, I don’t recall Hannah using her baking skills to solve a case. But in Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, Hannah was able to use her baking skills in her favor! I can’t say exactly the role Hannah’s skills played in the film’s mystery, as I don’t want to spoil the film. What I will say is the way they were written into the story was not only clever, but also unique for the series. Sometimes, a fictional detective’s “quirk” can contribute to their perspective, especially when approaching a case. Hannah’s baking skills certainly achieved this, as she was able to notice details overlooked by other characters! The utilization of Hannah’s “quirk” was refreshing, especially compared to a movie like One Bad Apple: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, where Hannah didn’t even solve the mystery.

Silver coin image created by Welcomia at freepik.com. <a href=’https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/american-one-dollar-coin_1180385.htm’>Designed by Freepik</a>. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/money”>Money image created by Welcomia – Freepik.com</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

What I didn’t like about the film:

Lack of urgency: I brought up earlier in this review how one of the plots of Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery is a court case involving fraudulent coins. The other two plots were a murder mystery and a missing person case. While these three plots interconnected with one another, the court case was prioritized in the script. This creative decision caused the story to lack urgency, which seems to be a consistent flaw in the more recent Murder, She Baked/Hannah Swensen movies. With so much emphasis on the court case, it felt like characters were taking their time solving both the missing person case and the murder mystery. Intrigue was decreased because of the lack of urgency.

Limited number of suspects: Like I just mentioned in my review, the script of Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery emphasized the fraudulent coin court case. Few key characters were involved in the court case, which provided a limited number of suspects. When a mystery story features a collection of suspects, it can add to the fun of trying to figure out “whodunit”, as the audience plays an engaging guessing game. It can also maintain a sense of intrigue to help viewers hold their interest in the film. Sadly, these elements were absent due to how few suspects were in Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery. This creative decision made the mystery’s reveal feel a bit predictable as well.

Underutilized part of the story: Toward the beginning of Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, Hannah is testing new recipes for an upcoming baking contest. She even offers one of her new pastries to Delores. But other than being brought up in two scenes, this baking contest barely plays a role in the script. In fact, it’s never revealed which pastry Hannah will submit to the contest. I found this underutilized part of the story disappointing because of its wasted potential. I recall the baking contest being international, which could have served either an interesting subplot or main plot. Looking back on Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, as well as the more recent Murder, She Baked/Hannah Swensen movies, it seems like underutilizing elements of the story is a trend within this series.

Interior image of detective’s office created by Vectorpocket at freepik.com. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/vintage”>Vintage vector created by vectorpocket – http://www.freepik.com</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

My overall impression:

When I talked about Reality Bites: A Hannah Swensen Mystery in my list of the best and worst movies I saw in 2025, I said if the Murder, She Baked/Hannah Swensen series continues in 2026, I’d like to see the quality become more consistent. Reflecting on Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery (as well as Pie To Die For: A Hannah Swensen Mystery and Sugar & Vice: A Hannah Swensen Mystery), I would say this consistency was achieved! Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery was, in my opinion, just ok. However, this movie improved upon some of the series’ flaws. Not only was Delores’ antics toned down again, her private investigation business was incorporated into the story in a way that made sense. This latest chapter in the Murder, She Baked/Hannah Swensen series contributed its own set of strengths, such as Hannah’s “quirk” becoming utilized within the script. But there are weaknesses in this series, including in Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery, I wish were not consistent, like the lack of urgency and underutilizing parts of the story. According to IMDB, ‘Cooked to Death: A Hannah Swensen Mystery’ is currently in pre-production. There also appears to be an Alison Sweeney and Ashley Williams project in development. Even though no official word has been made about the future of the Murder, She Baked/Hannah Swensen series, it’ll be interesting to see where this story goes from here.

Overall score: 6-6.1 out of 10

Have you seen Best Served Cold: A Hannah Swensen Mystery? Would you like to see the Murder, She Baked/Hannah Swensen series continue? Please tell me in the comment section!

Have fun at The Cookie Jar!

Sally Silverscreen

IMDB pages I referenced in this review: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt40629979/?ref_=tt_mlt_t_1, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt34094007/?ref_=tt_mlt_t_7

Word on the Street: ‘Ghostbusters’ and ‘Jaws’ Welcomed Back to Universal Orlando Resort

Last month, I wrote a Word on the Street story about Sailor Moon’s debut at Fan Fest Nights from Universal Studios Hollywood. In that article, I wondered if she would, someday, come to Universal Orlando Resort. While there hasn’t been any official word on Sailor Moon’s Floridian arrival, there has been a reunion with two beloved cinematic IPs (intellectual property). Andrew Boardwine, from InsideTheMagic, announces the return of Jaws and Ghostbusters as part of the Summer at Universal Orlando event. Both IPs are incorporated into the Universal Mega Movie Parade. Plus, Jaws is woven into a musical presentation called CineSational: A Symphonic Spectacular. The Hard Rock Hotel at Universal Orlando will host their “Ghostbusters-themed sand sculpture”, while the Universal Studios Florida park offers Jaws “themed photo opportunities, specialty food and beverage items, and exclusive merchandise”. According to Andrew, Summer at Universal Orlando runs between May 23rd to August 10th.

Carousel image created by Daviles at freepik.com. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/background”>Background image created by Daviles – Freepik.com</a>. <a href=’https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/carrousel-with-sky-background_954546.htm’>Designed by Freepik</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

Two years ago, I wrote an editorial proposing the idea of Universal Orlando Resort hosting an event called Murder, She Wrote Weekend. This idea came from learning more about Universal Studios Florida’s attraction, Murder, She Wrote Mystery Theatre, which debuted when the park opened in 1990. Ghostbusters Spooktacular and Amity Island (as well as a Jaws themed boat tour) also opened in 1990 alongside the park’s debut. Since then, all three attractions have become defunct. Both Jaws and Ghostbusters returning to Universal Orlando Resort shows long-time fans and newer guests the respect toward the resort’s history. This decision also provides a nice blend between classic and more recent attractions, especially considering, as of mid-to-late May, 2026, the only attraction from Universal Studios Florida’s debut still in operation is E.T. Adventure. For me, welcoming Ghostbusters and Jaws back to the park gives me hope Universal Orlando Resort’s older and/or underrated IPs could receive a new life through an attraction, entertainment, or merchandise. Who knows? Maybe Murder, She Wrote Weekend could become a reality after all.

What are your thoughts on this piece of movie news? Are you looking forward to seeing Jaws and Ghostbusters back in Universal Orlando Resort? Tell me in the comment section!

Have fun at the movies!

Sally Silverscreen

References:

https://insidethemagic.net/2026/05/after-36-years-universal-retires-classic-universal-studios-theme-park-ab1/

https://insidethemagic.net/2026/05/removed-ghostbusters-jaws-attractions-confirmed-for-universal-orlando-return-ab1/

https://www.universalorlando.com/web/en/us/things-to-do/shows/universal-mega-movie-parade

https://www.universalorlando.com/web/en/us/things-to-do/shows/cinesational-symphonic-spectacular

‘A Deep Dive into Classic Universal Studios Florida’ from the Youtube channel, Poseidon Entertainment

Word on the Street: Sebastian Stan Joins ‘The Batman Part II’ as Harvey Dent/Two-Face

If you put the name ‘Sebastian Stan’ in the same sentence as “superhero film”, you’d probably think of Bucky Barnes from the Marvel Cinematic Universe. But this time, Sebastian and “superhero film” are sharing the same sentence for a different reason. In 2027, he’ll star in The Batman Part II, “expected to play Harvey Dent, a.k.a. Two-Face”. Josh Wilding, from ComicBookMovie.com, reminds readers it’s been almost twenty years since Harvey Dent/Two-Face appeared in a theatrically released movie. When asked about the project, Sebastian said, “I feel like it’s a really ambitious movie” and “I really think it’s going to blow people away. “It’s going to surprise a lot of people”. He also said, “I’m so excited about Matt Reeves [directing] because he’s been one of my favorites for a long, long time”.

Since this Word on the Street story is about Sebastian Stan, including this photo in the article kind of makes sense. Screenshot taken by me, Sally Silverscreen.

I’ve mentioned in the past how I’m a fan of Bucky Barnes. I have also reviewed The Last Full Measure and Logan Lucky. However, Sebastian’s roles in these projects were not villainous. So hearing the news of Sebastian portraying Harvey Dent/Two-Face caught my attention, especially since I’ve never seen him portray a villainous character before! As I mentioned in this Word on the Street story, it’s been almost twenty years since Harvey Dent/Two-Face appeared in a theatrically released movie. That was when Aaron Eckhart portrayed the character in The Dark Knight. When I reviewed The Dark Knight, I praised Aaron’s performance for containing the right amount of emotions and versatility. From what I remember of Sebastian’s aforementioned projects, his performances were versatile, providing a strength to the projects themselves. Therefore, I’m intrigued to see how Sebastian and Matt Reeves approach the character of Harvey Dent/Two-Face!

What are your thoughts on this piece of movie news? Are you looking forward to The Batman Part II? Please tell me in the comment section!

Have fun at the movies!

Sally Silverscreen

Reference: https://comicbookmovie.com/batman/the-batman-2/the-batman-part-ii-star-sebastian-stan-breaks-his-silence-on-dc-debut-its-going-to-surprise-you-a227777

You Still Have Time to Join The “Eddie’s Year” Blogathon!

Are you a fan of Eddie Munson from Stranger Things? Would you like to learn more about 1986? Do ’80s movies make you feel nostalgic? Then The “Eddie’s Year” Blogathon is the event for you! Because the blogathon is taking place between June 6th-9th, you still have time to join! There’s also many topics to choose from, as I tried to make the event’s theme as broad as possible. If you’re interested in participating in The “Eddie’s Year” Blogathon, click on the link below to learn more about the blogathon.

Celebrating 40 Years of “Eddie Munson’s Year” With The “Eddie’s Year” Blogathon

The “Eddie’s Year” Blogathon banner created by me, Sally Silverscreen. Original image created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures.

Thank You for Being a Friend of The Golden Double Double Feature

When I chose the theme for this year’s double feature, I wanted to do something different from previous double features I’ve hosted by reviewing four films. With The Golden Girls featuring four main stars (Betty White, Estelle Getty, Bea Arthur, and Rue McClanahan) and with those stars possessing their own filmographies, I found a reason to seek out more of their projects. The movies I selected, Hallmark Hall of Fame’s The Lost Valentine, Mask, Mame, and The Little Match Girl, are just as unique as the “golden girls” themselves! I was reminded why I like Hallmark Hall of Fame’s The Lost Valentine when I decided to revisit it. Not only did I rediscover forgotten elements like the story’s humor, I, once again, came to appreciate what makes the film good. Mask was such a pleasant surprise because of how solid the movie is! It’s a biopic that brings something different to the genre’s table as well as genuineness. While I found both Mame and The Little Match Girl fine, I enjoyed the films for different reasons. Mame’s choreography and colorful palette helped make the film as entertaining as it was. Meanwhile, the cleverly written dialogue in The Little Match Girl allowed interactions between characters to be memorable. Now, as the sun sets on Miami and all the cheesecake has been eaten, I’d like to say thank you for being a friend of the Golden Double Double Feature!

The Golden Double Double Feature banner created by me, Sally Silverscreen. Original image created by Touchstone Television, Witt/Thomas/Harris Productions, 20th Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)

Have fun on the lanai!

Sally Silverscreen

Take 3: The Little Match Girl (1987) Review (Golden Double Double Feature Part 4)

Thanks for joining me for the fourth part of my Golden Double Double Feature! The majority of my review of The Little Match Girl is spoiler-free. If you’d like to learn more about why I chose this year’s double feature theme, you can check out the introduction in the link below.

Announcing The Golden Double Double Feature!

The Little Match Girl (1987) poster created by NBC Productions and National Broadcasting Company (NBC).

1. Out of the movies from Rue McClanahan’s filmography, why did you select The Little Match Girl?

Unlike my decision to review Mask and Mame, I knew Rue starred in The Little Match Girl before selecting the movie for the Golden Double Double Feature. However, similar to when I wrote about Mame and Mask, I had heard of The Little Match Girl, but hadn’t seen it prior to this double feature review. I also knew the 1987 film was an adaptation of one of Hans Christian Andersen’s stories. When it comes to The Little Match Girl, though, I was surprised to learn how many times that story was adapted, including in the 1980s. Throughout my eight-year blogging journey, I have covered my fair share of Christmas movies, especially those of the made-for-TV variety. With all that said, I decided to give The Little Match Girl a chance!

2. In The Little Match Girl, Rue portrays Frances Dutton. How is Frances Dutton similar or different from Blanche?

From what I remember, Blanche Devereaux came from a wealthy, Southern background. This fact was brought up from time to time on The Golden Girls. Rue’s character in The Little Match Girl, Frances Dutton, comes from a wealthier background as well. However, Frances and Blanche possess a major difference. While Blanche is sassy, bold, and even flirty, Frances is the complete opposite. In The Little Match Girl, Frances is not only soft-spoken and tender-hearted, she also has a gentler persona. So, it was interesting to see Rue portray a very different character in the 1987 Christmas film.

3. According to The Little Match Girl’s poster, the movie is based on Hans Christian Andersen’s story of the same name. Is there any story from Hans’ bibliography you wish had received a film adaptation?

As I mentioned in answer number one, I was surprised to learn how many times The Little Match Girl was adapted, including in the 1980s. But there have been other stories from Hans’ bibliography that received adaptations, with The Little Mermaid being a notable one. Therefore, I’d like to see an adaptation of one of Hans’ more overlooked titles. For example, The Bell revolves around the mystery of a bell that only rings at sunset. With nature playing a major role in The Bell, an adaptation of this story could be presented as live-action, with the cinematography of natural landscapes stealing the show. However, I think The Bell could also work as an animated project.

4. Was there anything about The Little Match Girl you liked or didn’t like?

Screenwriting, including the dialogue, in made-for-TV movies can be hit or miss. In 1987’s The Little Match Girl, however, I found some of the dialogue cleverly written. One example is when Neville meets the titular little match girl, Molly. When he orders a coffee, Neville adds alcohol from his flask. After Molly asks Neville about the flask, he tells her its “courage”. Molly then responds by telling him, “It doesn’t come in a bottle”. Later in the film, Police Chief Murphy threatens to shut down a local newspaper if there are any reports of Fennel Street’s residents being forced to leave their homes before Christmas. Joseph, the newspaper’s editor, tells Murphy, “Why don’t you crawl back in my father’s pocket where you belong”? Murphy spats out his response to Joseph when he says, “Cause I’m too big”. Because of how clever these responses were, it made these interactions (and the scenes themselves) memorable.

Like I just mentioned in this review, Police Chief Murphy threatens to shut down a local newspaper if there are any reports of Fennel Street’s residents being forced to leave their homes before Christmas. Joseph wants to report this injustice in order to save the homes of Fennel Street’s residents. One tactic is placing Molly’s picture on the newspaper’s front page to draw empathy for the intended cause. But the movie’s viewers don’t know if this tactic worked. That’s because the viewers never see the newspaper with Molly’s picture on the front page in circulation. This is an example of telling instead of showing. It’s also an example of how the movie prioritizes the stories of the grown-up characters despite The Little Match Girl being the movie’s title.

5. As I mentioned in my review of 1974’s Mame, there were two Christmas episodes of The Golden Girls; ‘ ‘Twas the Nightmare Before Christmas’ and ‘Have Yourself a Very Little Christmas’. If the show had created more Christmas episodes, what type of story would you have proposed?

In The Golden Girls’ sixteenth episode from the fourth season, ‘Two Rode Together’, Dorothy and Sophia take a trip to Walt Disney World. This creative decision was part of a trend where various sitcoms would set aside a special episode showing their characters taking a Walt Disney World trip. Based on what I recall, I don’t think any of these episodes take place around Christmastime. So, I would propose an episode of The Golden Girls where the “golden girls” spend Christmas in Orlando. Walt Disney World at Christmastime has been known for its beautiful decorations. Plus, I can think of hilarious antics that could be written into a story like this. Since three of Walt Disney World’s parks were open during the lifespan of The Golden Girls, there are a variety of attractions that could be featured in the episode.

Adorable Santa image created by Freepik at freepik.com. <a href=’https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/christmas-background-with-funny-santa_1324597.htm’>Designed by Freepik</a>. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/background”>Background vector created by Freepik</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

6. Did you develop any thoughts and/or questions while watching this film?

For this part of my review, I will spoil The Little Match Girl. If you have not seen this movie and are planning on watching it, skip ahead to question number seven.

Whenever Molly uses one of her matches, the flame sparkles. A snow angel she makes toward the beginning of the movie sparkles as well. In one scene, Molly explains to Joseph’s son, Jamie, that angels ride on shooting stars directly from Heaven if anyone in the world is in trouble. When Molly is discovered missing by Jamie’s grandpa, Haywood, it’s implied Molly was an angel the entire time. While this was an interesting plot twist, it’s a creative decision that left me with more questions than the movie was willing to provide answers for. Did Molly pass away prior to the events of The Little Match Girl or was she an angel that always existed in Heaven, similar to the angels from Touched by An Angel? How long has Molly been an angel? Has anyone known about Molly’s angel identity? The more I think about this plot twist, I more I believe there’s important lore missing from the script.

7. Throughout The Golden Girls, cheesecake became an iconic staple of the show. What would you say is the iconic staple of The Little Match Girl?

You would think I’d choose Molly’s matches, as the 1987 film is titled The Little Match Girl. But I’m selecting a candle instead. The residents of Fennel Street organize a protest at the Dutton family house, in an effort to save their homes. During the protest, they carry candles, with one of the protesters’ candles being lit by Molly herself. Toward the end of The Little Match Girl, Molly lights the candles of an angel themed Christmas decoration. But beyond the movie itself, candles are sometimes associated with Christmas décor; from candles in windows to candles placed on Christmas trees. Light is also a major theme of the Christmas holiday, such as the season of Advent and the Nativity Star. I’d even say light is a major theme of The Little Match Girl.

8. The Little Match Girl is a made-for-TV film. How does this movie compare to other Christmas television movies you’ve seen and even reviewed?

Looking back on the Christmas television films I’ve seen and reviewed, some of those titles featured at least one younger protagonist. But if I had to compare The Little Match Girl to another made-for-TV movie I’ve covered, it would have to be the 1999 film, If You Believe. Both stories possess a younger protagonist whose actions significantly impact the life of at least one of the story’s key characters. If You Believe and The Little Match Girl contain a sense of magical realism. These movies share the flaw of telling instead of showing as well.

9. The Little Match Girl was released on December 21st, 1987 (within the third season of The Golden Girls). Do you think the show had any impact on the movie?

In my review of Hallmark Hall of Fame’s The Lost Valentine, I speculated why the Hallmark Hall of Fame collection may not have cast any of the “golden girls” (Rue, Bea, Estelle, and Betty) in their movies during The Golden Girls’ lifespan. One of those speculated reasons was how Hallmark Hall of Fame and The Golden Girls were broadcast on separate networks. According to IMDB, 1987’s The Little Match Girl was not only produced by NBC Productions, it was also distributed by National Broadcasting Company (NBC). As I mentioned in my Hallmark Hall of Fame’s The Lost Valentine review, The Golden Girls aired on NBC. With that said, I don’t believe it was a coincidence for The Little Match Girl’s creative team to consider casting Rue in their movie.

10. After watching The Little Match Girl, is there anything you can take away from your movie-viewing experience?

Like I said in answer number one, I have covered my fair share of Christmas movies throughout my eight-year blogging journey, especially those of the made-for-TV variety. When it comes to 1987’s The Little Match Girl, I found the movie fine and serviceable. While there were strengths within the film, such as the acting performances and the cleverly written dialogue, the movie’s flaws held it back from being a stronger presentation. Despite the movie’s title being The Little Match Girl, the script prioritizes the stories of the grown-up characters. This creative decision kind of makes the title seem misleading, as I expected the story to focus more on the titular little match girl, Molly. Even though the plot twist was interesting, it left behind more questions than the movie was willing to provide answers for. In my opinion, it feels like important lore may have been omitted from the script. Reflecting on The Little Match Girl, as well as other Christmas films I’ve seen and reviewed, I can think of titles that are stronger than the 1987 picture. However, I can also think of movies that are weaker than The Little Match Girl.

The Golden Double Double Feature banner created by me, Sally Silverscreen. Original image created by Touchstone Television, Witt/Thomas/Harris Productions, 20th Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)

Thank you for being a friend!

Sally Silverscreen