This review is from my series, Comparing with the Critics. If you’d like to learn more about the series, click on the link below.
Introducing my new series, Comparing with the Critics!
Toward the end of At The Movies’ ‘Stinkers of 1984’ episode, Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert share a collection of films they felt were some of the worst movies of 1984. One of the films Roger brought up was Harry & Son. In a brief segment about the movie, Roger refers to the picture as a “sincere, but misguided dream”. Roger also calls Harry & Son “a painfully contrived tear-jerker”. Gene responds before the segment ends that “he and Burt Reynolds are two of the worst in ‘84”, likely referring to Paul Newman. I honestly hadn’t heard of this film until I watched this episode of At The Movies. Therefore, I approached the title with little to no expectations. But now that I have seen Harry & Son, I think calling the picture one of the worst of 1984 is, actually, a bit harsh.

While briefly talking about Harry & Son, Roger brings up Robby Benson. But instead of simply referring to Robby by his name, Roger says “Robby “gee Dad, want a diet pop” Benson”, even saying it in a mocking tone. By addressing Robby’s name in this way, Roger gives the impression Robby’s character, Howard “Howie” Keach, is just a stereotypical surfer jock. As I got to know this character while watching Harry & Son, I discovered this assumption was far from the truth. Throughout the story, Howie always has his heart in the right place. More often than not, he brings a burst of positivity, choosing to look at the glass half full. In a scene where Howie and his father, Harry, are on their porch, Harry orders his son to find a job, a bitter tone in his voice due to his frustrations over his declining health. In a positive, yet matter-of-fact way, Howie informs his dad how he already has a job washing cars. Another scene shows Howie coming home, excited to see his dad arrive so early from work. A big smile is spread across his face and his eyes shine bright with joy. But as he learns his dad has just lost his job, Howie’s face changes to display confusion and fear. This change in persona is seamless, never missing an emotional beat. Moments like this one were made possible by Robby’s acting abilities, showcasing a wide range of emotions and expressions. In my opinion, I think Robby should have, at least, been nominated for his performance in Harry & Son.

As I just mentioned in the previous paragraph, Harry is frustrated over his declining health. After an incident at a construction site, Harry is forced to be honest about his poor eyesight. One scene has Harry talking with one of his co-workers about his health issues, raising concerns over how these issues will affect his employment. In the 21st century, specifically the 2020s, there has been a risen awareness for men to address their medical issues. So, for Harry to talk to a peer about his health in a movie from the ‘80s is kind of ahead of its time. Later in the story, Howie learns his friend doesn’t have health insurance. When he takes his friend to the hospital, Howie is frustrated by the rejection his friend faces due to the hospital’s policies. The importance of health insurance is another medical topic that has gained attention in the 21st century, including the 2020s. Similar to what I said about Harry’s honesty about his health, I appreciate these brief, yet necessary moments to bring up these serious health subjects, especially in a time when they weren’t found in common societal conversations yet.

In the introduction of my review, I quoted Roger Ebert’s statements about Harry & Son, with Roger saying the film was a “sincere, but misguided dream” and “a painfully contrived tear-jerker”. I will agree with Roger about the movie being sincere. There were some sweet moments that were written, acted, and directed with a strong amount of sincerity. One example is when Howie goes to a high-end clothing store to purchase a suit jacket. When I first saw that scene, I honestly thought Howie had bought the jacket for himself, showing his dad how he can afford nicer attire. So, imagine my shock when Howie gave the jacket to his dad as a birthday present.
Where Roger and I disagree is how the movie is a “misguided dream” and a “painfully contrived tear-jerker”. I will admit Harry & Son has its flaws, such as scenes ending too quickly and emphasizing showing without telling. But I wouldn’t go so far as to say the movie is “misguided” or “painfully contrived”. With scenes ending too quickly, it felt like the characters were expected to say more. When Nina (Harry’s daughter and Howie’s sister) is talking with a client at a hair salon, I thought Nina was going to respond to the client’s story about their estranged father. But the moment is quickly forgotten as the story moves on. As Howie is reconnecting with Katie, an ex-girlfriend, their conversation is one of the most cryptic pieces of dialogue I’ve ever heard in a movie. While I could see these characters still cared for one another, by observing their expressions and displayed emotions, it took me a few minutes to figure out what Katie and Howie were saying to each other. This is just one example of showing without telling.

Gene added his thought on Harry & Son, stating “he and Burt Reynolds are two of the worst in ‘84”, as he possibly referred to Paul Newman. Since I haven’t seen many of Paul’s or Burt’s films, I can’t agree or disagree with Gene’s statement. But what I can do is share my overall thoughts on Harry & Son. This is an ok, slice of life story, which, in my opinion, would have worked better as a stage play. My reason is how the cast is smaller and the story seems more condensed. While I liked the acting performances in this film, Robby Benson ended up being the star of the show. If anyone has an interest in watching Harry & Son, I’d recommend the film for Robby’s performance alone. With the flaws I already mentioned, I also felt like there was too much happening in a short amount of time. However, the story itself was easier to understand. Harry & Son will not become one of the best movies I’ve seen this year, so far. But compared to some of the films I’ve, so far, seen, there are far worse titles than Harry & Son.
This review was brought to you by
Sally Silverscreen
I haven’t heard of this Paul Newman movie so the contrived tearjerker label has me wondering as I don’t often think of Newman in these kind of movies. I do like your idea for a blog series – is it just these critics you discuss or are you adding others to this series? Looking forward to part 2 of your double bill for the blogathon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Gill, for reading my review! My Comparing with the Critics series is based on the different versions of Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert’s show. In the later seasons of the show, when different critics make an appearance, their opinions will be included in Comparing with the Critics.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love Ebert’s reviews, he’s one of my favourites. Does Siskel have his own site?
LikeLiked by 1 person
As far as I know, Siskel does not have his own site. However, Ebert wrote several movie yearbooks between, I believe, 1984 to 2013.
LikeLike
Pingback: It’s In the Name of the Title: Day Three – Taking Up Room
Pingback: NEWS… The Last of Those Big Names in the In the Name of the Title Blogathon (For Now) – Realweegiemidget Reviews Films TV Books and more
This sounds like an interesting story, despite the flaws in the film. Robby Benson is always terrific, in my opinion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for checking out my review, Silver Screenings! Even though I thought ‘Harry & Son’ was an ok film, it does have its strengths, such as Robby’s performance. If you decide to watch the film, I’d be interested in reading your thoughts on it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve never seen Harry and son, but your entertaining review makes it clear that it’s not the worst film of 1984. As for Roger Ebert, when I hear about a film he once complained about, I remind myself that he wrote the screenplay to ‘Beyond the Valley of the Dolls’! I personally love the film, but Roger Ebert shouldn’t be so judgy cuz the film is a wonderfully chaotic mess!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, John, for reading my review! As I explained in the introduction of my series, Comparing with the Critics was created to determine how often I agree or disagree with Siskel, Ebert, or any other critic that appears on their show. Because film is subjective, it has been interesting to see how each opinion compares.
LikeLike
You had me at Robby Benson! I need to find this flick asap! Great post! xox
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Daffny, for checking out my review! As I mentioned in my article, Robby’s performance alone is worth seeing ‘Harry & Son’.
LikeLike
I was a huge fan of Roger Ebert’s and I have to admit that I loved it when he didn’t like a movie — I used to read his print reviews regularly, and he could be so entertaining when criticizing a film! I can imagine why he didn’t care for this one, but after reading your review, I may just check it out to see for myself. Thank you for introducing it to me!
— Karen
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome and thanks for reading my review! As I mentioned in my review’s introduction, I was actually introduced to ‘Harry & Son’ by Ebert and Siskel. If you end up seeing ‘Harry & Son’, I’d be interested in reading your thoughts on the film.
LikeLike
I agree with you that this wasn’t the worst film of 1984–“Supergirl” is probably closer on that front. Thanks again for joining the blogathon with this great review!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome and thanks for checking out my review! I haven’t seen ‘SuperGirl’, so I can’t agree or disagree with your statement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s OK. It’s definitely something. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person