Eddie Munson and Harris Trinsky: Two Sides of the Same Coin

In our landscape known as entertainment, a select group of movies, television shows, or characters are given the title of “popular”, “iconic”, or even “classic”. Sometimes, I try to check out programs or learn more about characters that get these titles to try to gain an understanding for why that program or character is well-liked in the first place. Back in 2022, when Stranger Things’ fourth season was released, I remember seeing pictures of Eddie Munson making his famous goofy face sprinkled across the internet like confetti on New Year’s Eve. Since I don’t watch the show, I didn’t think much of it then. That changed, however, when I saw the trailer for the fifth and final season of Stranger Things. Seeing Eddie’s headstone left me confused; how did this guy who seemed so popular on the internet end up dead? Like I said, I don’t watch the show. Therefore, I didn’t think it had a reputation like Lost or Game of Thrones; where no character is safe from getting killed off. Curiosity got the better of me almost immediately and I learned anything and everything I could about Eddie. To my surprise, the more I learned about him, the more I realized Eddie shared an uncanny amount of similarities with Harris Trinsky, my favorite character from Freak and Geeks. My curiosity, paired with my being a Harris Trinsky fan, are what led to the conception of this editorial, where I will discuss in depth why Eddie Munson and Harris Trinsky are two sides of the same coin!

Is it just me or do Harris Trinsky and Eddie Munson look similar to one another? Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, Upside Down Pictures, Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)

Who is Eddie Munson and Harris Trinsky?

Before I officially begin this editorial, we need to establish who Eddie Munson and Harris Trinsky are, especially for readers who are unfamiliar with these characters. Eddie Munson made his debut in the fourth season of the popular Netflix show, Stranger Things. He was introduced as the Dungeon Master of The Hellfire Club as well as the local “metalhead” (someone who like metal music). Since his debut in 2022, Eddie has become one of the most beloved characters not just from Stranger Things, but in television history. Eddie’s distinct appearance and personality have also made him a very marketable character. Harris Trinsky is a character the titular “geeks” are friends with on Freak and Geeks. Though he appears in ten of the show’s eighteen episodes, Harris has a reputation for being someone the “geeks” turn to for advice and guidance. Because of his inconsistent appearances on the show, only a portion of information is known about Harris. Despite this, his dry sense of humor and brutal honesty left a memorable impression.

This Stranger Things display in the Youtube video, ‘Spirit Halloween 2025 Store Tour’, from the Youtube channel, Spirit Halloween, proves how marketable Eddie is by prominently featuring his Hellfire Club shirt
From time to time, Harris joins the “geeks” at their lunch table on Freaks and Geeks. Original image created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)

1. Eddie and Harris are Dungeon Masters

This similarity is what initially sparked the discovery of other similarities that exist between these two characters. In fact, when I learned Eddie was a Dungeon Master, the first thing I said was, “just like Harris Trinsky”. In Dungeons & Dragons, a game that relies on adventure and strategy, Dungeon Masters are the ones who essentially control the game (known to players as campaigns). On Freaks and Geeks and Stranger Things, both Harris’ and Eddie’s Dungeons & Dragons groups participate in a campaign. During these campaigns, each group welcomes a new member. In the Freak and Geeks episode, “Discos and Dragons”, Harris (who is affiliated with the “geeks”) invites Daniel (a member of the “freaks”) to join his group’s upcoming campaign. When Daniel experiences his first campaign, he realizes he enjoys Dungeons & Dragons and the company of Harris’ group, which consists of Sam, Neil, Gordon, and Bill. He even successfully completes his first campaign because Harris and the “geeks” explain the game along the way.

In the Stranger Things episode, “The Hellfire Club”, Lucas (one of the members of Eddie’s Dungeons & Dragons group) is unable to attend that night’s campaign due to a basketball game. Dustin and Mike (two other members of The Hellfire Club) invite Lucas’ sister, Erica, to stand in for Lucas. What works in Erica’s favor is how she is familiar with Dungeons & Dragons prior to being invited to The Hellfire Club. Her familiarity with the game, along with Eddie and the rest of The Hellfire Club’s support of her participation, help Erica win her first campaign.

Even though Harris and Eddie are Dungeon Masters of their respective Dungeons & Dragons groups, the way these groups are led is quite different. Harris’ approach is more casual, simply giving the “geeks” a reason to hang out on the weekends. Before the campaign in Freaks and Geeks, Harris reveals how “ancient Babylonia” is incorporated into the campaign itself. Not only does the campaign featured in “Discos and Dragons” take place at one of the character’s houses, the campaign schedule is also flexible, as the “geeks” agree to meet the following Saturday after Daniel expresses interest in playing again.

Eddie’s group, The Hellfire Club, is more established. It has an official name, an official logo printed on official shirts, an official yearbook photo, and even an official meeting room (located in the drama/theatre room at Hawkins High School). The “Cult of Vecna” campaign featured in the episode, “The Hellfire Club”, incorporates elements of fantasy and science fiction, which reflects Stranger Things itself. Despite these differences, another major similarity between Harris’ and Eddie’s story is how Dungeons & Dragons is included to serve an overarching theme. Freak and Geeks uses Dungeons & Dragons to promote themes of acceptance, friendship, and building bridges (with Daniel and Harris’ Dungeons & Dragons group building a bridge between the “freaks” and the “geeks”). Stranger Things’ creative team uses Dungeons & Dragons in season four’s script to provide commentary on the “Satanic Panic” that took place during the 1980s.

These photos from “The Hellfire Club” present Eddie’s Dungeons & Dragons group like a elaborate production. Notice the stage lights in the background? Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures
In this picture from “Discos and Dragons”, Harris’ Dungeons & Dragons group takes a more casual approach to the game. Original image created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)

2. Harris’ and Eddie’s Stories Take Place in the 1980s, in High School, and in the Midwest

In the pilot episode of Freak and Geeks, “William McKinley High School”, “Michigan”, and “1980” are shown on screen. This text sets the stage for when and where Harris’ story (as well as the show) takes place. According to the video, “From CANCELED to CULT CLASSIC (Freaks and Geeks)”, from the Youtube channel, Media Pastimes, the characters live in the fictional town of Chippewa, Michigan. Because one of Freak and Geeks’ episodes is set on Halloween, the script establishes the story takes place specifically during the 1980-1981 school year. Through the dialogue, it’s revealed Harris is a sophomore at the aforementioned high school. Neil points out in “Tests and Breasts” how Harris is only a year older than the “geeks”. Harris also shares his story in the show’s pilot episode about how he faced his “freshman tormentor”, with the story being told in past tense.

Stranger Things is consistently set in the fictional town of Hawkins, Indiana. This major detail was established long before the show’s creative team even thought about including Eddie on the show. However, Stranger Things’ fourth season does provide the necessary information that determines when and where Eddie’s story takes place. Just in the first episode, “The Hellfire Club”, alone, the audience learns Eddie attends Hawkins High School. With the fourth season set during March 21st to 27th, 1986, it emphasizes Eddie’s story takes place during the 1985-1986 school year. This detail is emphasized again when it’s revealed Eddie is a “super senior”. In the episode, “The Hellfire Club”, Gareth and Jeff (two of The Hellfire Club’s members) call Eddie out for failing to graduate in 1984 and 1985. Despite this, Eddie expresses a desire to graduate in 1986.

If you begin watching Freaks and Geeks, these are the first images you’ll see. Original images created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
Hawkins High School and the “Leaving Hawkins” sign have become familiar landmarks for viewers of Stranger Things. Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures

3. Eddie and Harris Have An “Outsider” Status

Though Eddie and Harris are known as Dungeon Masters in their friend groups, they are both considered “outsiders” by those not affiliated with their personal circles. On Freaks and Geeks, Harris is labeled a “geek” primarily due to his association with the “geeks” (Sam, Neil, Gordon, and Bill). Meanwhile, Eddie admits he and the other members of The Hellfire Club are labeled as “freaks” when he says, “We’re the freaks because…we like to play a fantasy game?”

Harris and Eddie were not only mistreated in their respective shows for being “outsiders”, they were also bullied prior to the events of their stories. Though the only time Harris is treated poorly on Freaks and Geeks is when Alan (the “freshman tormentor” of the “geeks”) harasses the “geeks” in the episode, “Tricks and Treats”, Harris either admits to or implies other times he was bullied, such as when Harris shares his story about how he faced his “freshman tormentor”. Things got so out of hand, Harris’ “freshman tormentor” (Tom Cressman) broke Harris’ tailbone, which led to him getting expelled. When Daniel walks past Harris in the episode, “Looks and Books”, Harris asks Daniel, “You’re not gonna beat me up, are you?”

As mentioned before, Eddie was mistreated before and during his time on Stranger Things for being an “outsider”. Stranger Things Wiki states that “Upon beginning high school, Eddie found himself being targeted for bullies”. It’s unknown what the extent of the bullying was. In the episode, “The Hellfire Club”, when Eddie is delivering his famous monologue about the hypocrisy of forced conformity, one of Hawkins High School’s basketball players, Jason, calls Eddie a “prick” and a “freak”. This same character also creates false accusations against Eddie, such as claiming he is the leader of a Satanic cult. Jason takes things a step further when he not only kept a log of every location Eddie frequented, he and his friend, Patrick, also chased Eddie out of his hiding place while he had run away after Chrissy’s death.

Despite all the mistreatment Harris and Eddie have faced, neither is fazed by his “outsider” status. In fact, each wears it as a badge of honor by actively choosing to be his authentic self. This decision earns them respect and adoration from other characters in their stories. During their conversation in “Looks and Books”, Daniel commends Harris by telling him “you do your own thing”, you’re “comfortable with yourself”, and “You got it pretty wired, huh?” Keep in mind this conversation takes place before Harris invites Daniel to join his Dungeons & Dragons group. In a conversation from the Stranger Things episode, “The Piggyback”, Dustin shares with Eddie’s uncle, Wayne, “Even in the end, he never stopped being Eddie, despite everything”. Eddie also gains the friendship of characters outside of his social sphere, like Steve Harrington and Nancy Wheeler, due to his ability to help them when they needed him the most.

After writing this editorial, I now try to imagine how this conversation would go if Harris were talking to Eddie. Original images created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
As Clarence tells George in It’s a Wonderful Life, “Each man’s life touches so many other lives”. This image of Dustin giving Wayne his nephew’s guitar pick necklace is a beautiful representation of Clarence’s quote. Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures

4. Harris’ and Eddie’s Sense of Style

This similarity between Eddie and Harris is more trivial than the other similarities discussed in this editorial. However, it is still a similarity I noticed while conducting research for this article. As I said earlier, the fourth season of Stranger Things is set during March 21st to 27th, 1986. Therefore, Eddie’s story is more condensed than Harris’ story, which is more episodic and takes place over the course of several weeks. Despite this difference, both characters wear the same articles of clothing in multiple episodes. Harris can be seen wearing a gray plaid shirt in four episodes of Freaks and Geeks: “Discos and Dragons”, “Smooching and Mooching”, “Tricks and Treats”, and “Carded and Discarded”. Meanwhile, Eddie practically lives in his Hellfire Club shirt throughout his time on Stranger Things. It should also be noted how black is the most prominent color in both Eddie and Harris’ wardrobe. Every outfit Harris wears on Freaks and Geeks is either completely black or contains at least one article of clothing with the color black in it. Even though Eddie wears the same outfit for the entirety of Stranger Things’ fourth season, his articles of clothing containing the color black are the following:

  • Hellfire Club shirt (sleeves and collar of shirt are black)
  • Jeans
  • Watch
  • Leather jacket
  • Bracelet
  • Bandanna (Eddie wears this later in the season)

While we’re on the subject of Eddie’s wardrobe, a major difference is how his style is more personalized than Harris’. The shirt Eddie consistently wears promotes The Hellfire Club (his Dungeons & Dragons group). His denim vest features pins and patches of metal bands he’s a fan of, which are Motorhead, W.A.S.P., Judas Priest, Megadeth, Dio, Accept, Merciful Fate, and Iron Maiden. Though Eddie and Harris’ attire appears distinct from one another, their style is casual and low maintenance, promoting personal comfort and what makes them feel good about themselves.

These photos accurately show how many times Harris wears his gray plaid shirt. Original images created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
These pictures represent some examples of how the color black is incorporated into Harris’ wardrobe. Original images created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
In these photos, I point out how the color black is incorporated into Eddie’s wardrobe. Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures
In these three pictures, I point out the band pins and patches on Eddie’s denim vest. Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures

5. Eddie and Harris Possess a Rebellious Streak

Earlier in this editorial, I brought up Eddie’s famous monologue about the hypocrisy of forced conformity. If one were to watch that scene with little to no context, it might be easy to write Eddie off as a “rebel” or an “attention-seeker”. It is true Eddie has a prominent and consistent rebellious streak while on Stranger Things. But it’s important to pay attention to why Eddie possesses a rebellious streak. Eddie’s monologue is featured in the episode, “The Hellfire Club”. When he is introduced in this episode, Eddie reads a magazine article about the “dangers” of Dungeons & Dragons. The members of The Hellfire Club become discouraged over being considered “freaks” by the other students at Hawkins High School. This is when Eddie delivers his famous monologue, telling his friends;

“We’re the freaks because…we like to play a fantasy game? But as long as you’re into band, or science, or parties, or a game where you toss balls into laundry baskets! It’s forced conformity. That’s what’s killiiiiing the kiiiiids! That’s the real monster.”

During this monologue, Eddie climbs on the cafeteria table, yells loudly, and even makes his well-known goofy face I referenced in this editorial’s introduction. If you look past the theatrics and really listen to what Eddie is saying, he’s stressing how The Hellfire Club is treated differently due to the school community’s perception of the various extracurricular groups. By pointing out this hypocrisy, Eddie emphasizes the importance of embracing uniqueness and being a free-thinker. His monologue is such a beautiful example of how his rebellious streak is a product of his choices, as Eddie pursues his interest in Dungeons & Dragons despite the criticism and screaming the quiet parts out loud.

On Freaks and Geeks, Harris is known for having a laid-back personality. But he does show a glimmer of a rebellious streak in the episode, “Beers and Weirs”. Harris is a member of the group, McKinley High Sober Students, which discourages under-age drinking. Later in the episode, however, he attends a party hosted by Sam’s sister, Lindsay, that happens to be serving (non-alcoholic) beer. Before taking a large gulp of (non-alcoholic) beer, a party guest asks Harris if he’s a member of McKinley High Sober Students. Harris replies by telling the guest, “I only did that cause it looks good on my transcript for college.” Though this rebellious streak is brief, it is the result of Harris’ actions. Not only did he literally act in an improv performance hosted by McKinley High Sober Students, he also acts in his own interests by joining the group for academic gain instead of genuinely supporting the cause.

These two photos are from Eddie’s monologue about the hypocrisy of forced conformity. Though the theatrics make this monologue memorial, Eddie does bring up excellent points. Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures
One of the most popular pictures of Eddie, which has probably been seen all over the galaxy. Original image created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures
Toward the beginning of “Beers and Weirs”, Harris performs in an improv presentation with two other group members named Cindy and Millie. Original image created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)

6. Harris and Eddie Have a Healthy Sense of Confidence

What makes Harris and Eddie such likable characters is their healthy sense of confidence. Both of them consistently appear comfortable with themselves and satisfied with their skills and talents. After gym class, in the episode, “I’m with the Band”, Harris asks Sam if he’ll sign up for French next year. During this conversation, Harris expresses a desire to take German because he’s “a quarter German”. He then speaks German on two occasions: when he shares parting words with Sam and when he responds to Coach Fredericks’ roll call in gym class. Some people might feel intimidated or self-conscious about speaking a new language in front of their peers due to fear of judgement. But in “I’m with the Band”, Harris speaks German with confidence and ease. He prioritizes using the language in contexts he deems appropriate over other people’s reactions. Because of his healthy sense of confidence in his learning abilities, Harris receives an academic head-start, as he uses everyday situations to practice and master a new language.

Eddie has been the lead guitarist of the band, ‘Corroded Coffin’, since middle school. He even discusses his musical talents with a fellow student of Hawkins High School named Chrissy. In the Stranger Things episode, “The Piggyback”, Eddie’s guitar skills play a major and even lifesaving role. While in the Upside Down, the Demobats pose a huge threat to Eddie and his friends. In order to distract the Demobats so his friends can be protected, Eddie performs a solo of Metallica’s “Master of Puppets”. This plan ends up working, as his friends, Steve, Robin, and Nancy, are able to safely get away from the Demobats and reach their intended destination. Eddie’s healthy sense of confidence in his musical abilities allowed him to become a part of something greater than himself (which was the battle of good vs. evil). It also helped Eddie find a sense of belonging and purpose, especially after being considered an “outsider” and a “freak”. Eddie’s performance even left a good impression on Dustin, as he claims the “Master of Puppets” solo was the “most metal ever”.

Neil Schweiber was definitely caught off-guard when Harris spoke German in their gym class. Original images created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
Eddie’s solo was so “metal”, it earned Dustin’s stamp of approval. Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures

7. Eddie and Harris Display Self-Awareness

One quality that makes Eddie a great character is his self-awareness, which doesn’t get talked about enough. I will bring up two perfect examples where Eddie’s self-awareness shines through. When I said earlier how Eddie is a “super senior”, I mentioned Gareth and Jeff calling Eddie out for failing to graduate in 1984 and 1985. Eddie responds to this criticism by saying, “Yeah, yeah, and I was full of shit”. Anyone who knows anything about Eddie would know he’s been through some trauma in his young life. According to Stranger Things Wiki, Eddie experienced heartbreak at six years old when his mom, Elizabeth, passed away. His dad, Alan, became incarcerated, which led to Eddie’s uncle, Wayne, obtaining custody of his nephew. Keeping this information in mind, Eddie could have used his trauma as an excuse for not graduating high school sooner. He could have blamed others for his choices or given up by dropping out of school. But by admitting he was “full of shit”, he takes full accountability for his decisions and mistakes. At one point, Eddie states, “I am army crawling my way toward a D in Ms. O’Donall’s”, admitting how his grades aren’t the best, yet is trying to make some improvement in order to graduate. Later in season four, during a conversation with Steve, Eddie confesses, “…when the other dads were teaching their kids how to fish or play ball, my old man was teaching me how to hot-wire. Now, I swore to myself I wouldn’t wind up like he did…” Based on this quote alone, Eddie acknowledges two things. The first is how the way he grew up and the way his dad raised him isn’t “normal” or healthy. The second is how Eddie knows what kind of man he doesn’t want to be. This self-awareness I described explains some of Eddie’s decisions in Stranger Things’ fourth season, such as his sacrifice in “The Piggyback”. It fuels his objectives as well, like wanting to finally graduate high school.

Earlier in this editorial, when I brought up Harris’ explanation for why he’s a member of McKinley High Sober Students, it wasn’t just an act of rebellion for him. It was also Harris’ display of self-awareness for what he wants (to graduate high school) and how he’s going to achieve his goal. Other ways Harris works to achieve his goal are joining the William McKinley High School’s Audio/Visual Club (a group that consists of Harris and the “geeks”) and getting good grades (a fact he admits in his conversation with Daniel in the episode “Looks and Books”). On two separate occasions, Harris is in possession of a Dungeons & Dragons handbook: The Monster Manual (in “Looks and Books”) and Deities and Demigods (in “Discos and Dragons”). By owning these Dungeons & Dragons handbooks and taking the time to read them, Harris shows how eager he is to learn how to make campaigns as fun and engaging for everyone. He wants to truly understand the rules as well, so he can teach others how to play the game. These examples show Harris’ self-awareness for his role as a Dungeon Master and the responsibilities it entails.

Eddie responds to Gareth and Jeff’s criticism by showing his self-awareness. Original image created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures
Harris stays involved in the school community of William McKinley High School by joining the Audio/Visual Club. Original image created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
On Freaks and Geeks, Harris reads more than one Dungeons & Dragons handbooks so he can learn as much as he can about the game. Original images created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)

8. Harris and Eddie Assume a Leadership Role and Become Role Models for Their Stories’ Younger Characters

In their respective stories, Eddie and Harris earn a leadership role through their actions and choices. They both show their leadership through putting others before themselves. Alan (in the Freaks and Geeks episode, “Tricks and Treats”) claims he’ll leave the “geeks” alone if they give him their candy. Out of all the “geeks” Alan and his friends harassed, Harris is the only one to give Alan his candy. He even tries to tackle one of Alan’s friends in order to protect the younger “geeks”. Harris was willing to sacrifice his Halloween candy and fun so Sam, Neil, and Bill wouldn’t face further torment from Alan.

During Eddie’s monologue about the hypocrisy of forced conformity, he brings up three extracurricular groups: “band”, “science”, and the basketball team. What these three groups share in common is how their members are eligible to receive letterman jackets. Depending on the school, a student’s academic/extracurricular interests will be stitched somewhere on the jacket. Patches and medals related to those interests may be added to the jacket as well. Letterman jackets are representative of a student’s time spent in an extracurricular group, as well as symbolizes those members being a part of something greater than themselves. Eddie likely saw Hawkins High School’s letterman jackets and believed The Hellfire Club deserved something similar. So, he went the extra mile to create official Hellfire Club shirts and gave them to the group’s members. Though the gesture is simple, Eddie giving Hellfire Club shirts to each member makes them feel important, even when they don’t see themselves that way. Making his Dungeons & Dragons group inclusive through the little things makes Eddie a worthy Dungeon Master and an attentive leader.

These two photos from “Tricks and Treats” show how Harris tries everything he can to protect the “geeks”. Original images created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
In these photos, I point out how every member of The Hellfire Club wears their official shirt to school. Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures

Before Sam, Neil, and Bill go trick-or-treating, Harris warns them of rumors he heard about candy potentially being contaminated. When the “geeks” eventually go trick-or-treating, Sam expresses interest in going to a wealthy neighborhood because “they hand out the best candy”. Harris then points out, “That’s not true. Rich people traditionally give out the cheapest candy. That’s how they stay rich”. These two examples from “Tricks and Treats” show Harris looking out for the best interests of the “geeks” by wanting them to stay safe and trying to help them think logically about how to best utilize their time. Harris being a role model for the “geeks” inspired them to look out for others, like when they swapped out actual beer for non-alcoholic beer before Lindsay’s party in “Beers and Wiers”.

Throughout his time in Stranger Things’ fourth season, Eddie proves to be a man of his word. One excellent example is how he is always willing to lend a helping hand. When Eddie instructs Dustin and Mike to look out for “little lost sheepies” to substitute for Lucas, he specifically encourages them to find those “who need help”. During his story, Eddie consistently helps other characters, no matter their social standing. From reassuring Chrissy she’s not the only one who feels like they’re losing their mind to encouraging Steve to work things out with Nancy, helping where help is needed is one of Eddie’s top priorities. This has influenced Dustin the most. Eddie also consistently roots for Dustin to be his genuine, authentic self, such as telling him to “never change” and pointing out how brave it was for Dustin to wear a Weird Al t-shirt to school. When Eddie dies at the end of season four, Dustin is understandably devastated, as he lost his role model.

Harris joined the “geeks” on their trick-or-treating excursion in the episode, “Tricks and Treats”. Original image created by Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
Eddie tells Dustin to “never change” in the episode, “Papa”. Original image created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, and Upside Down Pictures

9. Eddie and Harris’ Stories Are Told in Only One Season

The fact Harris’ and Eddie’s story are told in only one season is the most heartbreaking similarity between these characters. There has been speculation, however, over whether Eddie could, somehow, return in Stranger Things’ fifth and final season. Eddie was introduced at the beginning of Stranger Things’ fourth season, but died at the end of season four due to his injuries caused by the Demobats. On the other hand, Harris’ story lasted for only one season because that’s how long Freaks and Geeks stayed on television. The show was cancelled after its first and last season due to a variety of issues, including leadership changes at NBC (the network that distributed Freaks and Geeks), creative differences between the show’s creative team and the network, an inconsistent schedule, and NBC failing to properly promote the show. These creative decisions, like cancelling Freaks and Geeks and killing off Eddie, leave questions that may never get answered, such as if Harris eventually married his “high school sweetheart”, Judith, and what Eddie’s life would look like after graduation. They not only deny the audience a satisfying conclusion, they also deny Eddie and Harris an opportunity to reach their full potential.

The last shots of Harris and Eddie on their respective shows. Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, Upside Down Pictures, Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)

Conclusion

I initially spent hours researching Eddie Munson because I wanted to understand why he was so popular. Not only did I achieve that understanding, I found a connection between Eddie and Harris Trinsky. The more I think about these characters, the more I see them as a lighthouse among a stormy sea, proving reliable in times of need. But if I had to be brutally honest, I wish Harris and Eddie had been a lighthouse for each other. Maybe Eddie could have protected Harris from getting his tailbone broken by Tom Cressman. Maybe Harris could have encouraged Eddie to graduate high school sooner and make better choices with his life. And maybe, just maybe, every year could have been “Eddie’s year”. I wish there was an alternate/parallel timeline/universe/dimension/multiverse where Harris’ and Eddie’s stories overlapped and they also became best friends, perhaps even brothers. Because I could see that as “the beginning of a beautiful friendship”. Stranger Things and Freaks and Geeks didn’t just give us two likable characters. They didn’t just give us two heroes worth rooting for either. What these shows gave us are two sparkling, shooting stars in our landscape known as entertainment.

Harris Trinsky and Eddie Munson: two sparkling, shooting stars. Original images created by 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre, Netflix, Upside Down Pictures, Apatow Productions, DreamWorks Television, and National Broadcasting Company (NBC)

Editorial References:

Stranger Things Wiki

I Willie Dont Know (Youtube channel)

“From CANCELED to CULT CLASSIC (Freaks and Geeks)” from the Youtube channel, Media Pastimes

“The IMPOSSIBLE musician, Eddie Munson” from the Youtube channel, RemGames

“Eddie Munson beinghimself for 6 minutes straight (contains ST4 spoilers)” from the Youtube channel, Will Breyers

“Top 10 Reasons We Love Eddie Munson on Stranger Things” from the Youtube channel, MsMojo

Take 3: Let Me In (2010) Review

I apologize to my readers for my lack of blog posts these past two weeks. I’ve been working on an editorial I’m publishing on Halloween. Researching, writing, and curating that editorial has taken up a lot of time. But I wasn’t going to miss out on participating in Taking Up Room’s Secret Places and Trippy Houses Blogathon, especially since my selected film is a perfect choice for Halloween! When I learned one of the eligible subjects was “strange neighbors”, I was reminded how I was recommended the 2010 movie, Let Me In. Suggested by John L. Harmon, I had heard it was one of the better vampire films in the world of cinema. Since I had heard of the movie, but never saw it, I couldn’t agree or disagree with that statement. But now that I’ve finally seen Let Me In, I can now give my honest opinion about the film!

Let Me In (2010) poster created by Overture Films, Exclusive Media Group, Hammer Films, EFTI, and Relativity Media

Things I liked about the film:

The mise-en-scène: As I explained in my review of 1955’s The End of the Affair, mise-en- scène is how a film’s scene is presented to the audience. Throughout Let Me In, the way mise-en- scène was utilized presented scenes in visually creative ways. At the very beginning of the movie, a snowy forest was shown during the night. The only source of light comes from two police cars and an ambulance. A long shot slowly becomes a close-up shot, giving the audience a reason to focus on the bright vehicles. Anytime Owen and Abby look through the peephole of their apartment door, the shot is shown in a fish-eye lens. This film-making technique puts the audience in Abby and Owen’s perspective, allowing them to see what the children are seeing. It also emphasizes how, despite their differences, Owen and Abby have shared experiences like seeing who is at their door.

How music was incorporated: Music can be an effective component of film-making. It can elevate a scene’s emotions or set a scene’s tone. In Let Me In’s opening scene I just referenced in this review, a rhythmic drumbeat is one of the first sounds the audience can hear. That specific sound creates a sense of urgency, signifying danger is on the horizon. When Abby moves into Owen’s apartment building, gentle angelic-sounding singing can be heard. This is symbolic of how Owen sees Abby; an angel who will provide a light in his darkness. The two examples from Let Me In I discussed add additional context to the scenes themselves. How the film’s creative team incorporated music into the 2010 picture shows the understanding they had for how music can work in their project’s favor.

Disguising Abby’s vampire identity: Before watching Let Me In, I knew it was a vampire movie. But I was pleasantly surprised by how Abby’s vampire identity was disguised. Most of Abby and Owen’s interactions take place at night, at first seeming like just a coincidence. When Owen notices Abby isn’t wearing shoes, she states how she doesn’t feel cold. Abby even tells Owen she’s stronger than he thinks. These verbal and visual clues creatively signified how Abby was a vampire. But because of the clues’ subtlety, it leaves the audience guessing why, on the surface, Abby seems so strange. New twists on vampire cliches, like vampires avoiding sunlight, made Let Me In more unique from other vampire films.

The Secret Places and Trippy Houses Blogathon banner created by Rebecca from Taking Up Room

What I didn’t like about the film:

The audio: When I reviewed Fist of Fury, I talked about the film’s audio being one of the major flaws. I had to turn up my television’s volume in order to hear what the characters were saying. Let Me In shares this same issue. Once again, I had to raise my television’s volume just to hear the dialogue, as the characters’ speech was quiet. As I suggested in my review of the Hallmark Hall of Fame movie, Face to Face, Let Me In’s creative team should have used ADR (automated dialog replacement).

The bullying subplot: One of the subplots in Let Me In involves Owen dealing with bullies. This subplot gave Owen a conflict to resolve, with the conflict eventually reaching a resolution. But because the script prioritized Abby and Owen’s friendship, the bullying subplot wasn’t consistently focused on. In fact, Owen stands up to his bullies about an hour into this hour and fifty-six minute movie. The inconsistency of the bullying subplot also drew that story out longer than necessary.

Underutilized religious undertones: In a scene taking place at a hospital, President Ronald Reagan is delivering a speech on television. During the speech, he talks about evil being present in the world and how people are joined together by Scripture. Owen’s mother says prayers during mealtime and features religious relics in her apartment. These are some examples of the religious undertones in Let Me In. With the movie set in early 1983, I thought the “Satanic Panic” was going to play a large role in this story, especially with Abby being a vampire. However, the religious undertones present in the script were underutilized, not providing any commentary or interesting perspective. In fact, it felt like this part of the film was there just for the sake of being there.

Happy vampire image created by Freepik at freepik.com. <a href=’https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/several-vampires-ready-for-halloween_1317599.htm’>Designed by Freepik</a>. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/party”>Party vector created by Freepik</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

My overall impression:

Vampires are no stranger to 18 Cinema Lane. Out of the vampire movies I’ve seen (and reviewed), these projects have shown that this type of story can be as creative as film-makers want it to be. 2010’s Let Me In is an interesting and creative vampire film! Abby’s vampire identity was disguised in very clever ways, even putting new twists on vampire cliches. How mise-en-scène and music were incorporated into the movie showcases the creative team’s more unique approach to a familiar type of story. While Let Me In has its merits, it also has its flaws. Religious undertones that could have provided commentary or an interesting perspective to the script were underutilized instead. Poor audio and an overshadowed subplot also didn’t help. But the 2010 project does stand out from other vampire titles. If you don’t mind a slow-burn story that primarily focuses on the power of friendship, then I’d say give Let Me In a chance.

Overall score: 7 out of 10

Have you seen Let Me In? What kinds of movies do you like to watch around Halloween? Let me know in the comment section!

Have fun at the movies!

Sally Silverscreen

Comparing with the Critics – Best of 1985 – Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome

This review is from my series, Comparing with the Critics. If you’d like to learn more about the series, click on the link below.

Introducing my new series, Comparing with the Critics!

In my Comparing with the Critics review of Amadeus, I mentioned the Falco song, “Rock Me Amadeus”, being one of the reasons why I was intrigued to review the movie. I actually have a similar experience with Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome. Every time I think of this film, I think of the Tina Turner song, “We Don’t Need Another Hero (Thunderdome)”. This is an ironic coincidence, as “We Don’t Need Another Hero (Thunderdome)” and “Rock Me Amadeus” were released in 1985. Another ironic coincidence is how, for the Comparing with the Critics series, I, once again, selected an ‘80s film both Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel liked. Though Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome only appeared on Roger’s list of the top ten best films of 1985, each critic gave the movie a thumbs-up when they reviewed it on an episode of At The Movies. Before this Comparing with the Critics review, I had never seen any of the Mad Max movies, let alone Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome. Therefore, I couldn’t agree or disagree when Roger stated that Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome was “the best of the Road Warrior movies” or when Gene declared it was “a great, violent, fun picture”. Now that I have seen the film, I can honestly say I don’t agree with Gene’s and Roger’s praise. It’s not that Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome is a bad movie, I just didn’t like or love it as much as the critics did.

Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome poster created by Kennedy Miller Productions and Warner Bros.

While sharing his opinion on Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome in an episode of At The Movies, Gene complements the directors, George Miller and George Ogilvie, as both of them “successfully creates a complete alien world on film”. To add to Gene’s statement, Roger commented how the film’s “world is as rich as Casablanca or as rich as Oz”. I admit one of the strengths of Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome was its set design, as the movie’s creative team presented an atmosphere that felt immersive! One of the conflicts in the story is Max battling in a duel against a character named Blaster, in order to retrieve his stolen items. They fight within the titular Thunderdome, a circular caged structure built out of steel-like material. What adds to the scene’s immersion is the medium and close-up shots captured within the Thunderdome. The combination of these creative choices helps the audience feel like they are right in the middle of the excitement! Even the sign advertising the Thunderdome is a blend of color, light, and dirt. This specific prop captures the thrill of the dueling action while also consistently displays the film’s aesthetic.

Image by Freepik

As I said in this review’s introduction, Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome ended up on Roger’s list of the top ten best films of 1985. One of his reasons was how he “was overwhelmed by the wealth of new ideas they came up with in the third picture”. Specifically speaking about Max and Blaster’s aforementioned duel, Roger explains how this scene presents two new ideas; “a new place to put the audience, which is over the top of the dome, and a new way to fight by putting the people on elastic bands so they have a three or a four dimensional, if you will, fight instead of regular punching it out”. Adding to Roger’s explanation, both Max and Blaster were given more freedom to move around the Thunderdome because of their elastic harnesses. While there was fist-fighting in the duel, flips and large jumps were incorporated in the fight choreography. Blaster and Max were presented with a variety of weapons, which added to the duel’s unpredictability. It also shows how the duel itself was a battle of strategy. This scene is definitely one of the most memorable from Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome!

Back to 1985 Blogathon banner created by Quiggy from The Midnite Drive-In and Hamlette from Hamlette’s Soliloquy

While Gene and Roger sang the praises of Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome, I was disappointed they ignored Tina Turner’s portrayal of Aunty Entity. Personally, I think Tina is a better actress than some people give her credit for. Her performance in this film proves that. A great example is when Master confronts Aunty Entity about the true leadership of Bartertown. Before this confrontation, Aunty Entity is confident in her ability to rule over this little community. Master calls her out by questioning who’s in charge. Aunty’s confidence gradually turns into anger. She develops a stern look on her face, the anger itself filling her eyes. There’s even a point where Aunty’s bottled-up anger causes her to shake. This scene shows how Tina’s performance was able to say so much while utilizing very little dialogue.

Illustrated image of Arizona desert created by pikisuperstar at freepik.com. Background vector created by pikisuperstar – www.freepik.com

Like I brought up in my review’s introduction, I didn’t like or love Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome as much as Roger and Gene did. A reason for my opinion is how the script left several questions unanswered. When Max meets the children of the Planet Erf tribe, the children believe he is Captain Walker. They describe Captain Walker as a plane pilot who will lead them to a better land. Because Jedediah was introduced in Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome as a man who could successfully fly a plane, I thought he could be Captain Walker, connecting him to the Planet Erf tribe’s part of the story. But this wasn’t the case, leaving questions about Captain Walker’s whereabouts. I was also not a fan of the creative team’s decision to prioritize telling over showing. A good example is when Blaster is about to be defeated in his and Max’s duel. Master begs Max not to kill Blaster, as he has a lot of respect for Blaster. However, this respect isn’t shown leading up to that scene. The only interactions with Master and Blaster are Master simply using Blaster as a means of transportation. Had the respect and camaraderie between Blaster and Master been better displayed, the duel itself and even its aftermath would have carried more emotional weight.

Comparing with the Critics banner created by me, Sally Silverscreen. TV show title cards created by WTTW National Productions, WTTW, Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), Lifetime Television, Tribune Entertainment, Buena Vista Television, and Disney-ABC Domestic Television

When Roger Ebert placed Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome on his list of the top ten best films of 1985, he called it “a great looking, high styled thriller”. Gene Siskel even claimed that “kids are gonna want toys out of this film” and “people are gonna dress like out of this film”. I can only speak for myself, but I wouldn’t go out of my way to seek out merchandise related to this movie or even revisit this movie. That’s because I thought Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome was just a fine, well-made picture. I couldn’t become fully invested in this story because of the collection of unanswered questions, which left me confused. I did not like the creative team’s decision to emphasize telling over showing as well. But the movie does have its merits. The world-building was one of the strongest aspects of the production, as the directors helped create an on-screen world that felt immersive. I not only liked the acting, I also believe the Thunderdome duel was one of the film’s most memorable scenes. So, this is yet another review where I didn’t agree with the critics. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got to go sing along to Tina Turner’s song, “We Don’t Need Another Hero (Thunderdome)”!

This review was brought to you by

Sally Silverscreen

Comparing with the Critics – Worst of 1985 – The Bride

This review is from my series, Comparing with the Critics. If you’d like to learn more about the series, click on the link below.

Introducing my new series, Comparing with the Critics!

The summer of 1985 was a disappointing time for Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert. They were so let down by that particular time of the year, At The Movies dedicated an entire episode to discussing the worst movies of the summer. The Bride, which was released on August 16th, was the first film featured in this episode. It left such a bad impression on Roger and Gene, it also appeared on the ‘Worst of 1985’ episode of the show. In each of these episodes, Roger describes The Bride as “an ambitious film that lost it’s way” and a movie that “shot for the stars and failed miserably”. Because I hadn’t even heard of The Bride before starting my Comparing with the Critics series, I couldn’t agree or disagree with Roger’s sentiments. From the way the movie was described, it seemed to answer the question of what would happen if Victor Frankenstein’s female creation fell in love with him? This is a question that is infrequently asked in Frankenstein related media. As someone who has read Mary Shelley’s source material, I was curious to see how the film’s creative team would answer this question. But now that I have seen The Bride, I’m disappointed by how this question was approached. Unlike Gene and Roger, though, I wouldn’t go so far to say the movie is bad.

The Bride poster created by Colgems Productions Ltd., Delphi III Productions, Lee International Studios, and Columbia Pictures

After showing a clip from The Bride in At The Movies’ Worst Movies of the Summer episode, Roger claims the film “didn’t know whether it wanted to be a serious movie about the philosophical issues raised by the whole Frankenstein legend or whether it just wanted to be a glamourous, sleek remake”. I personally believe the movie’s creative team knew exactly what they were doing, accomplishing two goals in one picture. Throughout The Bride, there are two parallel stories; the first about Frankenstein and his female creation (Eva) and the second about Frankenstein’s male creation (Viktor) and Rinaldo. These stories show Viktor and Eva learning about the world around them as well as interacting with those they depend on. Every time Rinaldo introduces Viktor, he always refers to Viktor as “his friend”. Meanwhile, Frankenstein calls Eva “his ward”. The stories in The Bride were, in my opinion, intended to take a specific approach to the Nature vs. Nurture debate, presenting how two creations created by the same man could journey to the same outcome.

In Mary Shelley’s original source material, there aren’t really any heroes in that story. That’s because it focuses on the main message of some good intentions possibly leading to bad results. In The Bride, Viktor receives a “hero’s journey”, where he not only gets to fall in love, he also gets to save the day. His name, according to Rinaldo, even means “He will win”. As I mentioned in this review’s introduction, I have read Mary Shelley’s novel. From what I remember, Frankenstein destroys his female creation and his male creation is presented in the story as more of a cautionary tale. With that said, I think this creative liberty added an interesting dynamic to The Bride!

Hand-written letter image created by Veraholera at freepik.com. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/background”>Background vector created by Veraholera – Freepik.com</a>. <a href=’https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/love-letter-pattern_1292902.htm’>Designed by Freepik</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

While talking about The Bride’s two parallel stories, Gene says the story of Viktor and Rinaldo “was much more interesting than Frankenstein and the monster”. I find myself agreeing with Gene, especially since this story included a “hero’s journey” and a conflict that needed to be resolved. But another reason why I liked Rinaldo and Viktor’s story is David Rappaport’s portrayal of Rinaldo. When Rinaldo first meets Viktor, he’s surprisingly not intimidated by Viktor’s size. Instead, Rinaldo’s confidence helps Viktor find a sense of belonging as well as build a friendship between himself and Viktor. Rinaldo’s charisma shows the audience his good intentions, always striving to give Viktor a better life than Frankenstein did. As he’s giving Viktor a new shirt, Rinaldo is horrified by the scars on Viktor’s back. The sight immediately brings concern to Rinaldo’s face, his saddened tone of voice concluding how Viktor must have been mistreated. The scene I just described shows how David’s performance gave Rinaldo a genuineness that allowed him to be a likeable character. Though this film is titled The Bride, Rinaldo became this movie’s MVP!

Back to 1985 Blogathon banner created by Quiggy from The Midnite Drive-In and Hamlette from Hamlette’s Soliloquy

Both Roger and Gene agreed that Viktor and Eva should have spent more screen-time together. Roger proclaims “if we’re gonna have those parallel stories for two hours, let’s have a pay-off at the end”, with Gene adding “a pay-off for half an hour, not for five minutes”. Like I talked about earlier in this review, I believe the creative team’s intention for The Bride was to present a specific approach to the Nature vs. Nurture debate, as well as giving Viktor a “hero’s journey”. However, my biggest criticism with these parallel stories was the editing. The way these stories were sewn together made the movie feel disjointed. This is because some parts of the story were longer than others. One scene shows Eva studying a series of pictures by herself for only a few seconds. The very next scene shows Viktor and Rinaldo on their journey to the circus, with the scene itself lasting several minutes. Frankenstein and Eva receiving shorter screen-time sometimes prevented the audience from seeing interesting interactions between these two characters. This creative decision also gave Eva and Frankenstein’s story less intrigue.

Group of clowns image created by Freepik at freepik.com. Image by Freepik

When I was introduced to The Bride, I was given the impression the film was trying to answer the question of what if Victor Frankenstein’s female creation fell in love with him. This made me curious to see how the movie’s creative team would answer this question. But like I said in my review’s introduction, I’m disappointed by how this question was approached. That’s because the film’s creative team didn’t answer or explore the question at all. They bring up an equally interesting and infrequently asked question of what if Frankenstein fell in love with his female creation? However, so much time was spent focusing on Eva learning about the world around her, the aforementioned question was given little time for exploration or discussion. When it came to Frankenstein’s love for Eva, it simply came across as possessive and controlling. As I’ve been saying throughout this review, Viktor was given a “hero’s journey”. This means the story always intended to have Eva fall in love with Viktor, not Frankenstein. Even though I liked the creative decision of Viktor’s “hero’s journey”, I’m still disappointed by the potential questions that were left unanswered.

Comparing with the Critics banner created by me, Sally Silverscreen. TV show title cards created by WTTW National Productions, WTTW, Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), Lifetime Television, Tribune Entertainment, Buena Vista Television, and Disney-ABC Domestic Television

Toward the beginning of At The Movies’ Worst Movies of the Summer episode, Gene claims the summer of 1985 “happened to be one of the dullest, most juvenile, most homogenized summer movie seasons in recent memory”. Out of the movies that premiered during that time, I’ve only seen six pictures in their entirety, including The Bride. Personally, I didn’t find any of these films to be bad or disappointing. Specifically speaking about The Bride, I thought it was a fine, serviceable, interesting enough title. Though I was disappointed the movie’s creative team didn’t answer the question of what if Victor Frankenstein’s female creation fell in love with him, there were aspects of the film I liked. While the acting was one of the strengths of The Bride, David Rappaport’s portrayal of Rinaldo shined the brightest! Rinaldo was such a likable character, he became my favorite! Another strength of this film was Viktor receiving a “hero’s journey”. Even though it was a creative liberty, it added an interesting dynamic to The Bride’s story. It was also interesting to see the creative team’s approach to the Nature vs. Nurture debate. I apologize for sounding like a broken record, but this is yet another Comparing with the Critics review where I disagreed with Roger and Gene. As I continue with my series, I have to wonder how often this will keep happening?

This review was brought to you by

Sally Silverscreen

Comparing with the Critics – 1985 – Introduction

Looking back on 1985, one can see the abundance of stand-alone films released that year. While cinemas welcomed sequels, these movies were exceptions to the rule, compared to the box office of 2025. That’s because studios and film companies were more selective about which titles received another chapter. Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome joined this exclusive club. It even left such a good impression, it earned a place on Roger Ebert’s list of the top ten best films of 1985. As I mentioned earlier in this introduction, 1985 saw an abundance of stand-alone movies. However, these projects were not created equally. The Bride tried to find an answer to the infrequently asked question of what would happen if Victor Frankenstein’s female creation fell in love with him?  Both Roger and Gene Siskel were so disinterested in finding an answer to this question, that the film was not only featured in At The Movies’ Worst Films of 1985 episode, it also made an appearance in the show’s Worst Movies of the Summer episode. At this point in the introduction, you probably think Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome and The Bride being singled out is purely a coincidence. But these titles were specifically chosen for Midnite Drive-in’s and Hamlette’s Soliloquy’s Back to 1985 Blogathon, where I’m reviewing The Bride as the Worst of 1985 and Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome as the Best of 1985!

Comparing with the Critics banner created by me, Sally Silverscreen. TV show title cards created by WTTW National Productions, WTTW, Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), Lifetime Television, Tribune Entertainment, Buena Vista Television, and Disney-ABC Domestic Television

Take 3: The Dark Crystal Review + 510 Follower Thank You

For this Blog Follower Dedication Review, I wanted to write about an animated film. That’s because the last animated movie I reviewed was hoops&yoyo’s Haunted Halloween last October. As I was looking for the right title to choose, I realized I don’t often talk about animated films involving puppetry. Therefore, my Blog Follower Dedication Review will highlight 1982’s The Dark Crystal! On 18 Cinema Lane, the only projects of Jim Henson’s I’ve reviewed were 1981’s The Great Muppet Caper and 1985’s Follow That Bird. Choosing to write about The Dark Crystal has now become ironic, as all three of these movies were released in the 1980s. While I thought Follow That Bird was Sesame Street’s fine first attempt at making a movie, The Great Muppet Caper was a fun, joyful experience. Where will The Dark Crystal rank among these two pictures? Journey through this review to find out!

The Dark Crystal poster created by Incorporated Television Company (ITC), Henson Associates (HA), Henson Organisation, The Jim Henson Company, Associated Film Distribution (AFD), and Universal Pictures

Things I liked about the film:

The puppetry: Jim Henson has set the bar high when it comes to the art of puppetry! Through his work with The Muppets and on Sesame Street, Jim created characters that were fascinating to watch and were adoringly memorable. In The Dark Crystal, his craftmanship, direction, and artistic vision contribute to the quality his style of puppetry is known for. The way characters move provide just one example. Jen, the movie’s protagonist, goes on a quest to fulfill a prophecy by finding a crystal shard. This quest shows Jen walking, climbing, riding, and even jumping. The execution of these movements were so well-done, there were times I forgot I was watching a puppet. How Jen was able to blink and move his head was also impressive!

The scenery/set design: Films in the fantasy genre, like The Dark Crystal, have a reputation for presenting imaginative, fantastical worlds. Good movies in this particular genre will make these respective worlds immersive through an emphasis on attention to detail. I can honestly say the creative team behind The Dark Crystal truly cared about how the world surrounding the characters was showcased. An excellent example is when Kira and Jen meet for the first time. The location itself is a tropical oasis; complete with green plants, soft earth on the ground, and even a small body of water.  It feels like an actual jungle because of the realistic appearance of the materials. More often than not, the tropical space is peaceful, which gives the audience a break from the tension of the film’s conflict. The tonal and visual pairing of the jungle helps the audience stay invested in the story.

Use of practical effects: In the 21st century, CGI (computer generated imagery) has become the go-to tool of film-making. The popularity and accessibility of CGI has caused a debate over whether this film-making tool is over-used. So, watching a film like The Dark Crystal in 2025 is refreshing, as the 1982 production utilizes practical effects. In one scene, the Skeksis Emperor dies. Instead of the Skeksis Emperor simply laying unconscious, the body literally crumbles like rocks being broken down. Another scene shows Jen and Kira rowing on a lake. The foliage surrounding the lake appeared life-like, as did the body of water itself. This is because the film’s creative team incorporated actual water and other related props to make the scene feel as realistic as possible.

Colorful galaxy image created by Freepik at freepik.com. <a href=’https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/lovely-hand-drawn-galaxy-background_2943080.htm’>Designed by Freepik</a>. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/background”>Background vector created by Freepik</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

What I didn’t like about the film:

An underutilized character: When the Skeksis General becomes the next Emperor, he shuns the Chamberlain from the Skeksis kingdom. The Chamberlain then tries to find ways to get back into the Emperor’s good graces. Despite these attempts, the Chamberlain was underutilized in The Dark Crystal. He appeared in only a handful of scenes and his role in the film’s plot was minimal as well. I was hoping the Chamberlain’s rejection would express the ideas of standing against group mentality and changing a person’s way of thinking. Sadly, these ideas were not incorporated into the Chamberlain’s story.

Scenes that became padding: The run-time of The Dark Crystal is an hour and thirty-three minutes. However, the movie’s run-time seemed longer because some scenes became padding. One example shows a group of Skeksis eating dinner. This scene features a medium shot of each dinner guest eating their meal, making the scene feel drawn out. If The Dark Crystal’s run-time had been less than an hour and thirty-three minutes, scenes like the Skeksis’ dinner would be trimmed.

A confusing resolution: For this part of my review, I will spoil The Dark Crystal. If you haven’t seen this movie and are planning on watching it, skip to the part of my review titled ‘My overall impression’.

A voice-over at the beginning of The Dark Crystal explains how the Skeksis and Mystics were at odds with each other after the titular crystal broke. The upcoming Great Conjunction will determine who will rule the land, with Jen’s quest to find a crystal shard playing a role in this decision. The way this conflict was explained made me believe the overall story was a battle of good versus evil. But when Jen reunites the crystal shard with the titular crystal, the resolution became confusing. As the Skeksis kingdom falls apart and the Skeksis themselves are running around in fear, the Mystics arrive and surround the titular crystal. The Mystics and Skeksis then merge to become one ghost-like being. The reunion between these groups was never explained throughout the movie. Maybe a scene explaining why this particular resolution was reached was left on the cutting-room floor?

Image by Freepik

My overall impression:

When it comes to quality, the art of puppetry is a spectrum. On the higher end of this spectrum has always been the work of Jim Henson. The Dark Crystal provides a strong example for why that statement is true. The puppets’ artistry and execution were truly impressive, with their movements making me sometimes forget I was even watching puppets at all. Set design and scenery from the 1982 production looked like the film’s creative team truly cared about how the story’s world was presented. I also liked how practical effects were used, which brought a sense of realism to certain moments! Even though The Dark Crystal had its strengths, it had its flaws too. From a confusing resolution to an underutilized character, the film wasn’t perfect. But it was a fine, interesting presentation, definitely one of Jim Henson’s more ambitious projects. Before I conclude this review, I’d like to thank my blog’s followers for their support of 18 Cinema Lane! These articles always encourage me to expand my cinematic horizons!

Overall score: 7 out of 10

Have you seen The Dark Crystal? Which Jim Henson presentation would you like to see in a future Blog Follower Dedication Review? Please tell me in the comment section!

Have fun at the movies!

Sally Silverscreen

The Top Ten Best Stand-Alone Films

On this day in 2000, The Road to El Dorado made its official debut. While the movie didn’t meet or exceed DreamWorks’ expectations, it certainly found an audience, which stuck with the film for all these years. I once heard The Road to El Dorado was intended to be the first story in a trilogy. But fate decided it worked better as a stand-alone picture. This caused me to think about the other stand-alone movies I’ve come to love. So, in honor of The Road to El Dorado’s 25th anniversary, I have compiled a list of what I believe are the top ten best stand-alone films! For my list, the criteria for a stand-alone film is not only a title that didn’t receive a sequel, but also isn’t affiliated with a series/franchise. If I covered a film on 18 Cinema Lane, I will provide a link to that article or review in this list. Each title will be presented in order of release year and each choice is based on my opinion.

The Road to El Dorado poster created by Dreamworks Pictures, DreamWorks Animation, and DreamWorks Distribution

1. Singin in the Rain (1952)

    I start my list with a classic I was introduced to because of my blog. Now that I have finally seen Singin in the Rain, I have an understanding and appreciation for why the movie is so beloved. Gene Kelly’s iconic musical number, “Singin in the Rain”, should provide enough explanation for why you should check the film out! The number itself feels immersive, as it takes place within the story’s context. Gene adds uniqueness to the number by jumping and splashing in puddles. “Singin in the Rain” successfully represents the spirit of the film, while also delivering the message of seeing the good in a not-so-good situation. That number is just one reason why Singin in the Rain is a solid musical!

    Watching ‘Singin in the Rain’ for the First Time

    2. Ben-Hur (1959)

    If you’re going to watch any classics, you have to see 1959’s Ben-Hur! Though the three-hour run-time can seem intimidating, that time flew by for me, as I was so engrossed in the story. The emotional intensity of Charlton Heston’s, Stephen Boyd’s, and Haya Harareet’s performance complimented the scope of the overall film. Ben-Hur contains other likable qualities as well, from the magnificent sets/scenery to the interesting cinematography. How Christianity/faith was incorporated into the story sets the 1959 production apart from other “sword and sandal” pictures. Those who celebrate Easter may find Ben-Hur an appropriate seasonal title.

    Take 3: Ben-Hur (1959) Review + 60 Follower Thank You

    3. To Kill a Mockingbird (1963)

    While the book, To Kill a Mockingbird, received a sequel, the film adaptation did not. The 1963 movie presents one of the few times where, in my opinion, the film was better than its source material. Getting straight to the point a lot sooner was a main focus for the creative team. The film’s visual nature worked in the favor of certain elements from the book. Showing suspenseful moments from the source material makes those moments seem real, as well as intensifies uncertainty. Leaving out scenes that feel like padding helps the movie maintain a steadier pace.

    Take 3: To Kill a Mockingbird Review

    4. The Boy Who Could Fly (1986)

    When I first saw The Boy Who Could Fly, it subverted my expectations. That’s because the 1986 picture aged surprisingly well! Through Milly and Eric’s friendship, the script shows how people with Autism can create and maintain meaningful relationships. Helping someone with Autism based on their personal preferences and accommodations may have seemed ahead of its time back in the mid to late ‘80s. Timeless messages and themes make up one of the reasons why I love the 1986 film. Showing compassion for others, dealing with grief, and understanding people’s differences take center stage.

    Take 3: The Boy Who Could Fly Review (PB & J Double Feature Part 2)

    5. The Bodyguard (1992)

    In 2022, I wrote an editorial explaining why The Bodyguard held up thirty years later. Because I love the 1992 film, finding explanations wasn’t difficult. “The kitchen scene” is, in my opinion, the best scene from any action movie. One reason why is how the kitchen’s smaller space is seen by the actors as a challenge instead of a hindrance. What also worked in The Bodyguard’s favor was Whitney Houston’s portrayal of Rachel Marron. Throughout the story, Whitney realistically showcases emotions and expressions. This helped Rachel become a multi-layered character.

    I Will Always Love You: ‘The Bodyguard’ at 30

    The Boy Who Could Fly poster created by Lorimar Motion Pictures and 20th Century Fox. Image found at https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090768/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0.

    6. Swept from the Sea (1998)

    Swept from the Sea was one of the earliest hidden gems I discovered in 2019. It’s a movie that’s so great, I just had to include it on this list. There are so many things to like about Swept from the Sea. From Vincent Perez’s captivating performance to the beautiful scenery, the film’s components came together to create an endearing and emotional presentation! The 1998 film is a character-driven story, relying on on-screen chemistry in order to work. Because of Vincent Perez’s and Rachel Weisz’s differing acting styles, the on-screen chemistry between Yanko and Amy was very sweet and genuine.

    Take 3: Swept from the Sea Review (A Month Without the Code — #8)

    7. Phantom of the Megaplex (2000)

    This is another movie I just had to include on my list. But this time, it’s because Phantom of the Megaplex is also celebrating its 25th anniversary this year! The Disney Channel picture showed that the movie-going experience can be fun. As I explained in my editorial celebrating the film’s 20th anniversary, the made-for-TV movie also serves as a time capsule of how the cinema operated in the beginning of the millennium. Phantom of the Megaplex even shows how movies can influence our lives. Though I’m not sure if that aspect of the story was intentional, it makes the 2000 title, somewhat, thought-provoking.

    ‘Phantom of the Megaplex’ at 20: A Reflection on the Movie-Going Experience

    8. I Am David (2004)

    I Am David was the biggest pleasant surprise of 2024. It became the year’s best movie in March and stayed number one until the very end! What set I Am David apart was the film’s genuine emotion and sincerity. This was seen and felt through every aspect of the production. The 2004 movie emphasized visual depth. Achieved by exploring light and darkness, as well as showcasing Europe’s natural landscape, the creative team used the visual nature of film to their project’s advantage. Two effective plot twists are another reason why I liked I Am David. Their delivery in the story was well-written.

    Take 3: I Am David Review (Double Feature: 2004 Edition Part 1)

    9. From Up on Poppy Hill (2011)

    This 2011 presentation is one of Studio Ghibli’s stronger projects. A reason is one of the overarching themes; honoring the past. The film intelligently and creatively shows its audience how important history is in our lives and our world. Whether referencing the 1964 Olympics or focusing on the characters’ relationships, the theme of honoring the past acts as an umbrella sheltering Poppy Hill and its surrounding areas. Studio Ghibli’s signature colorful palette is consistently on display in the 2011 film. The strong understanding for how and when to use color makes scenes look like priceless pieces of art! Personally, I think movies like From Up on Poppy Hill present an argument why 2-D animation still has its time and place.

    Take 3: From Up on Poppy Hill Review + 200 Follower Thank You

    10. The Wild Robot (2024)

      I think it’s fitting to close this list with a DreamWorks movie, as a DreamWorks movie is the reason why I created this list in the first place. Though this was a recent watch for me, The Wild Robot is, so far, the best film I’ve seen this year! The animation itself is absolutely gorgeous! Sometimes, scenes look like paintings and other times, they look like priceless photographs. I was not expecting the story to contain as much emotional depth as it did. An abundance of good messages and themes add a sense of timelessness to the production. Though it’s unknown right now if The Wild Robot will gain an audience like The Road to El Dorado has, I can confidently say it was a really good movie!

      Phantom of the Megaplex poster created by the Walt Disney Company and Disney Channel. © Disney•Pixar. All rights reserved. Disney XD© Disney Enterprises, Inc.

      Have fun at the movies!

      Sally Silverscreen

      Sally Watches…Highway to Heaven

      Have you read a synopsis for a movie or television episode that sounded so “bonkers” or over-the-top, you just had to check it out? That’s what happened when I came across the Highway to Heaven episode, “Ghost Rider”. I’ve seen enough episodes of this show to have an idea of what to expect. But then I read the synopsis for “Ghost Rider” on Hallmark Family’s website, which is the following:

      “A lonely female novelist is in love with a legendary spy hero who has been dead for 20 years. She buys his sports car, that is being auctioned off, only to find out that his ghost comes with the car.”

      For the 11th Annual Favourite TV Show Episode Blogathon, I had an excuse to not only check out “Ghost Rider”, but to also write about it. However, just because a movie or tv episode sounds “bonkers”, doesn’t mean it will be. Two examples from 18 Cinema Lane are the Lifetime movie, Sea Change, and the 1977 picture, The White Buffalo. Will “Ghost Rider” prove to be as “bonkers” as it sounds? Let’s travel down the highway of this review!

      The 11th Annual Favourite TV Show Episode Blogathon banner created by Terence from A Shroud of Thoughts

      Episode Name: Ghost Rider

      Season 3, Episode 24

      Premiere Date: April 1st, 1987

      What I liked about this episode:

      As I mentioned in this review’s introduction, the synopsis for “Ghost Rider” sounded “bonkers”, due to the story containing a car inhabited by a ghost. But that was not the primary focus of the story. Instead, the creative team behind Highway to Heaven placed more emphasis on Mark and Jonathan helping Birdy Belker. Birdy is a mystery writer who is not only interested in espionage, she’s obsessed with a special agent named Roger Bolt. Jonathan and Mark attempt to give Birdy the courage to live a more satisfying life, one where she can thrive and tell her own tales of adventure. Birdy’s story reminded me of Tracy’s story from the Touched by an Angel episode, “Perfect Little Angel”. A similarity between these episodes is how a major theme is being brave enough to reach your potential.

      What I didn’t like about this episode:

      Toward the beginning of the episode, Jonathan explains to Mark (and the audience) who Birdy is and why she needs their help. This explanation is presented as a voice-over, as if Jonathan were talking about events from a story in the mystery/noir genre. The voice-over was a good creative choice, making the episode unique from others of Highway to Heaven. However, this voice-over was included in only one part of the story. I wish that creative element was more consistently incorporated into the episode, with Jonathan’s voice-over appropriately fitting Birdy’s interest in espionage.

      Typewriter image created by Freepik at freepik.com. <a href=’https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/typewriter-and-paper-sheet_713020.htm’>Designed by Freepik</a>. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/vintage”>Vintage vector created by Freepik</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

      The story itself:

      When I talked about what I liked about “Ghost Rider”, I said the story placed more emphasis on Jonathan and Mark helping Birdy develop the courage to reach her potential. While the episode features a car inhabited by a ghost, these elements were woven together in a way that fit within the established brand/tone of Highway to Heaven. The reason for Birdy possessing the car was because Mark encouraged her to purchase it, in an effort to help her find a new perspective on life. The ghost’s existence in the story had less to do with haunting and more to do with their place in the Afterlife. There was also a creative approach to the type of story about “never meeting your heroes”. In the case of “Ghost Rider”, the reality of who Roger Bolt was affects Birdy’s fantasy of him.

      The other factors from this episode:

      • I already mentioned in this review how Birdy is a mystery writer. However, she uses the pen name ‘Natasha Gudonov’. When you say that last name quickly, it sounds like “good enough”. This joke is even acknowledged by the ghost after they learn more about Birdy. Personally, I found the joke to be the most cringe-worthy part of this episode.
      • In a typical Highway to Heaven episode, Jonathan will reveal his true identity as an angel toward the end of the story. He will discreetly use his angelic abilities throughout the episode as well. But in “Ghost Rider”, Jonathan is more honest with Birdy, sharing the truth about himself shortly after they meet. He’s even straightforward about his angelic abilities. I liked this change in storytelling! It gave “Ghost Rider” some creativity and allowed the story to stand out from other Highway to Heaven episodes!
      • For this part of my review, I will be spoiling “Ghost Rider”. If you have not seen this episode and are interested in watching it, skip ahead to the part of my review titled “my overall thoughts”.

      Earlier in this review, I said there was a creative approach to the type of story about “never meeting your heroes”. In “Ghost Rider”, Birdy receives the opportunity to meet Roger Bolt, as he is the ghost inhabiting the car she purchases. During this initial meeting, Jonathan reveals how, during Roger’s life, he was an arrogant womanizer. This information shocks Birdy. However, earlier in the episode, Birdy tells Jonathan and Mark how she knows everything about Roger. With that said, wouldn’t Birdy have known about Roger’s true persona?

      Antique car image created by Freepik at freepik.com. <a href=’https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/red-classic-car_803652.htm’>Designed by Freepik</a>. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/vintage”>Vintage vector created by Freepik</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

      My overall thoughts:

      In my review’s introduction, I talked about wanting to check out “Ghost Rider” because of the synopsis on Hallmark Family’s website. But looking back on this episode, I feel that synopsis does the story a disservice. Yes, a story of a ghost inhabiting a car sounds “bonkers” on paper. How that concept was incorporated into “Ghost Rider”, let alone Highway to Heaven, actually worked better than I expected! As I said in my review, more emphasis was placed on Mark and Jonathan helping Birdy thrive in life. This part of the story, along with the ghost inhabiting the car, fit within the established brand/tone of the show. “Ghost Rider” does have its flaws, such as Jonathan’s voice-over being inconsistent. But, overall, I found this episode to be fine and pleasant!

      Rating: A 3.5 out of 5

      Have fun on television!

      Sally Silverscreen

      Take 3: Tarzan in Manhattan Review

      During my search for my “so bad, it’s good” movie, I’ve learned to find two things: a film that is built on a gimmick and a film that is unintentionally funny. Though these things have helped me get one step closer to finding my “so bad, it’s good” movie, a film has yet to earn that coveted title. For the annual So Bad It’s Good Blogathon, I had several selected movies to choose from. But, in the end, I picked the 1989 film, Tarzan in Manhattan! That title alone gives away the project’s gimmick; an iconic character existing in a more contemporary setting. Based on the movie’s synopsis, there seems to be elements that could be unintentionally funny, such as Jane becoming more street-smart when she’s usually known for being book-smart. But what made me ultimately select Tarzan in Manhattan for the So Bad It’s Good Blogathon were the reviews on IMDB. According to what I read, it seemed like the movie’s creative team didn’t take their project seriously because they acknowledged the film’s gimmick. With all of that said, let’s see if this movie could become my “so bad, it’s good” film!

      Tarzan in Manhattan poster created by American First Run Studios and CBS

      Things I liked about the film:

      The acting: When I reviewed The Chalk Garden earlier this month, I said I was invested in the story because of the acting performances’ quality. I also said each acting performance was good for different reasons. In Tarzan in Manhattan, the cast made a strong effort to make their performances as entertaining as possible. In my opinion, these efforts worked, as their performances kept me invested in the story! Joe Lara used emotion well while portraying the titular character. A great example comes from the first ten minutes of the movie. Tarzan experiences a tragedy, as he discovers someone close to him passed away. Upon making this discovery, Tarzan is understandably upset. His eyes are brimming with tears and his mouth presents a frown. Quickly realizing what possibly happened, Tarzan’s sadness turns into anger within seconds. He then grits his teeth and the rest of his facial features become tense.

      Kim Crosby portrays Jane in Tarzan in Manhattan. In my review’s introduction, I pointed out how Jane became more street-smart. Because of this creative decision, Kim adopts a down-to-earth, laid-back personality she consistently carried throughout the movie. When Jane meets Tarzan, she’s unfazed by the situation. Her whole persona presented the idea she, as a cab driver, has seen it all. Portraying Jane’s father, Archimedes, is Tony Curtis. Similar to Kim’s performance, Tony’s on-screen no-nonsense attitude was consistent. What also worked in Tony’s favor was how believable his on-screen interactions were. Anytime Archimedes and Jane shared a conversation, it felt like a realistic discussion between father and daughter. The strength of Kim’s and Tony’s acting talents helped make that possible!

      Respect toward the source material: While I haven’t read the book Tarzan in Manhattan is based on, I have seen another adaptation of the Tarzan story. Based on that experience, it appears the creative team of the 1989 film made efforts to respect the source material their project is based on. Remember when I said in this review’s introduction how Jane became more street-smart when she’s usually known for being book-smart? It is true she is street-smart in Tarzan in Manhattan. However, the book-smart aspect of her character actually worked in harmony with the street-smarts. Around the time she and Tarzan first meet, Jane shares how she has a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from NYU. Her book-smarts, along with problem-solving skills, help Tarzan find an important clue in figuring out Cheetah’s whereabouts. Throughout his New York City trip, Tarzan carries a bag of expensive jewelry as a form of currency. It is revealed the collection of jewelry belonged to Tarzan’s parents, the Lord and Lady of Greystone, before they passed away.

      How humor was incorporated: I mentioned in my review’s introduction how Tarzan in Manhattan’s IMDB reviews were the reason I chose the film for the So Bad It’s Good Blogathon. Based on those reviews, it seemed the movie’s creative team didn’t take their project seriously because they acknowledged the film’s gimmick. As I watched the 1989 picture, I could detect a sense of self-awareness. From the dialogue to the “Easter Eggs”, it felt like the movie’s creative team recognized how much of a gimmick their project was built on. During the plane ride to New York City, Tarzan is reading a book about surviving in New York on five dollars a day. This “Easter Egg” calls out how expensive the Big Apple can be. After somersaulting his way into a locked room, Tarzan leaves that same room by escaping through an open window. This situation causes Archimedes to ask Jane why Tarzan can’t leave through the door like other people. The aforementioned self-awareness in Tarzan in Manhattan made comedic moments genuinely hilarious!

      The Seventh So Bad It’s Good Blogathon banner created by Rebecca from Taking Up Room

      What I didn’t like about the film:

      Things that don’t make sense: There were some parts of Tarzan in Manhattan that didn’t make sense. One example takes place toward the beginning of the film. Within the first five minutes of the story, Tarzan is shown living a secluded life from civilization, how Tarzan is usually portrayed in other adaptations. Then, all of a sudden, a man named Joseph shows up to give Tarzan and Cheetah a pair of books. Based on their interaction, it seems like Joseph and Tarzan’s friendship has lasted even before the events of the movie. If Tarzan lives close enough to civilization where walking to Joseph’s store is possible, why does he still live isolated in the jungle?

      Inconsistent sense of urgency: A reason why Tarzan travels to New York City is to rescue Cheetah. This part of the film’s synopsis would warrant a sense of urgency throughout the story. But Tarzan, along with Jane and Archimedes, don’t figure out what likely happened to Cheetah until more than twenty minutes into an hour and thirty-four-minute film. While there is a sense of urgency in Tarzan in Manhattan, it appears at certain moments in the movie. These creative choices made the story’s sense of urgency inconsistent.

      Part of the story that doesn’t lead anywhere: On more than one occasion, the audience is reminded how Tarzan is the son of the Lord and Lady of Greystone. Jane even purchases a book featuring his family’s portrait. I appreciate the creative team’s efforts to respect the source material their project is based on. However, the part of the film about Tarzan’s family history didn’t lead anywhere. The story’s main conflict had nothing to do with the Greystone estate. Tarzan’s family weren’t even featured in a subplot. I wish that part of Tarzan in Manhattan had a stronger connection to the overall story.

      New York City skyline with letters image created by Freepik at freepik.com. <a href=’https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/new-york-skyline-typographic-silhouette_719554.htm’>Designed by Freepik</a>. <a href=”https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/background”>Background vector created by Freepik</a>. Image found at freepik.com.

      My overall impression:

      When I started this review, I said I learned to find two things when looking for my “so bad, it’s good” movie; a film that is built on a gimmick and a film that is unintentionally funny. Tarzan in Manhattan is definitely built a gimmick, with enough self-awareness in the movie to acknowledge this. But what the film isn’t is unintentionally funny. The way the story’s humor was written and delivered gave the audience a reason to laugh with the creative team, not at them. Humorous moments felt like they were intended to be comedic. This is one of the reasons why Tarzan in Manhattan was as entertaining as it was! Though there were flaws in the 1989 picture, there were aspects of the project I liked. A few examples are the acting performances and the on-screen chemistry between Joe Lara and Kim Crosby. Even though moments with high-stakes and a sense of urgency are sprinkled throughout the story, Tarzan in Manhattan is, for the most part, silly and goofy fun. Out of all the movies I reviewed for the So Bad It’s Good Blogathon, I’d say Tarzan in Manhattan is the best one. So, when it comes to finding my “so bad, it’s good” movie, I ended up taking a detour this time.

      Overall score: 7 out of 10

      Have you seen Tarzan in Manhattan? Which adaptation of the Tarzan story is your favorite? Please tell me in the comment section!

      Have fun at the movies!

      Sally Silverscreen

      It’s Time for the 7th Annual Gold Sally Awards!

      Here at 18 Cinema Lane, I maintain several annual traditions to give my readers something to look forward to. One of those traditions is the Gold Sally Awards, which commemorates my blog’s anniversary! The award categories are created by me and based on topics I’ve brought up on my blog. With two new awards in 2025, I’ll explain the significance of those categories. Like in 2024, I will discuss why I chose each recipient. Now, let the 7th Annual Gold Sally Awards begin!

      7th Annual Gold Sally Awards Winners created by me, Sally Silverscreen.

      The Kay’s Costume Party Dress Award

      (Best Outfit from a Movie)

      Helen’s Christmastime Outfit from Hallmark Hall of Fame’s Pack of Lies

      When I thought about the various categories of the Gold Sally Awards, I realized there was no category recognizing the wardrobe department of the movie industry. To fix that, I created the Kay’s Costume Party Dress Award! The name of this award references the dress Kay (Joan Collins’ character) wore at a costume party in the 1983 tv movie, Making of a Male Model. I loved this dress so much, it was featured in 2021’s Movie Blogger’s Christmas Wish-List! From the films I saw in 2024, there were several outfits I really liked. The one that was the most memorable, however, came from the Hallmark Hall of Fame presentation, Pack of Lies! The outfit in question was featured in my Movie Blogger’s Christmas Wish-List from last year; the black and blue ensemble Helen (portrayed by Teri Garr) wore during Christmastime. This timeless outfit was worn in only one scene. That fact is why Helen’s outfit earned the inaugural Kay’s Costume Party Dress Award!

      The Edward Boult Award

      (Missed Opportunity in Cinema)

      Not making Signed, Sealed, Delivered: A Tale of Three Letters a Christmas movie

      Last June, I speculated how Signed, Sealed, Delivered: A Tale of Three Letters could be a Christmas film. In my editorial about my speculation, I explained how the movie’s title could be a reference to either the Nativity story or A Christmas Carol. I also wondered if Signed, Sealed, Delivered: A Tale of Three Letters and “Signed, Sealed, Delivered: To the Moon and Back” could be a two-part adaptation of A Christmas Carol, with the rock star character intended to be a Marley-like character. The official marketing for Signed, Sealed, Delivered: A Tale of Three Letters proved my speculation wrong. But the more I think about how this movie could have been a Christmas picture, the more I wish it had been a Christmas production. As of early February, 2025, the Signed, Sealed, Delivered series has received only one Christmas movie. Plus, my aforementioned editorial provided ideas for a potential Christmas script. With Hallmark Mystery’s ‘Miracles of Christmas’ viewership numbers lower in 2024 than 2023, maybe the network will consider creating another Signed, Sealed, Delivered Christmas film.

      The They Deserve an Award Award

      (An Actor or Actress Who Deserves Recognition)

      Luke Goss (for his performance in Hallmark’s Frankenstein) and Badja Djola (for his performance in Christmas on Division Street)

      There were several good acting performances I saw in 2024. So, it was difficult to choose just one recipient for this year’s Gold Sally Awards. Both Luke Goss’ and Badja Djola’s performance was so impressive! In Hallmark’s Frankenstein, Luke’s use of emotion allowed The Creature to speak without actually speaking. An example I used in my review of the 2004 television film was when The Creature bursts into tears while seeking refuge in a barn. Luke’s acting skills made his character as complicated as he was in Mary Shelley’s source material. Badja made his character, Scorpio, so memorable, despite having limited appearances in Christmas on Division Street. With a consistently commanding presence, Scorpio was a character I looked forward to seeing on screen. That’s because Badja used his acting talents to give Scorpio captivating interactions with other characters. The scene where Scorpio shares some of his backstory with Cleveland is the example I used in my Christmas on Division Street review.

      The Cowboy Award

      (Character Who Makes an Unnecessary, Drastic Change)

      Sorsha from Willow

      You’re probably wondering why I gave Sorsha the Cowboy Award, even though I grew to like her as a character. While I found her transformation from villain to hero necessary, it was drastic. In my Comparing with the Critics review of Willow, I shared how Sorsha’s aforementioned evolution was too abrupt. The transformation gave Sorsha some character development, but it left some questions unanswered. For this flaw, blame lies in the screenwriting.

      Sally’s MVP Award

      (Character Who Left a Memorable, Showstopping Impression)

      Madmartigan from Willow

      When I watch a movie, there is, sometimes, a character who leaves such a memorable impression on me, they end up stealing the show. I have called these types of characters “MVP”. To acknowledge the “MVPs” of 18 Cinema Lane, I created the new Sally’s MVP Award! One of these “MVPs” was Madmartigan from Willow. In my Comparing with the Critics review of the 1988 film, I talked about how Madmartigan was the story’s comic relief. His personality and comedic timing captivated my attention and kept me invested in his story. What helped Madmartigan become the “MVP” of Willow was the screenwriting and Val’s performance.

      The “She Won’t Give Me My Chocolate” Award

      (Best Quote from a Movie)

      “Christmas is already a poem. It doesn’t need my help” – Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, I Heard the Bells (2022)

      In the 2022 movie, I Heard the Bells, Fanny (portrayed by Rachel Day Hughes) encourages her husband, Henry, to create a Christmas themed poem. Henry (portrayed by Stephen Atherholt) told his wife, “Christmas is already a poem. It doesn’t need my help”. When Henry said this, I started to think about what his quote meant. Poems require planning and putting the right pieces together, in order for that poem to have good flow and writing structure. Christmas festivities require a certain amount of planning, whether it’s a local church’s Nativity play or a family’s Christmas party. Using these two examples, finding the right pieces is important, such as who will portray the Three Wise Men or what will be the entrée of Christmas dinner. Poems can also tell stories. One classic example is ‘‘Twas the Night Before Christmas’. Christmastime is filled with stories, from the Nativity story to A Christmas Carol. Henry’s aforementioned quote made me see Christmas in a completely different way! Plus, a quote from a Christmas movie has never won the “She Won’t Give Me My Chocolate” Award before.

      The Honorable and Dishonorable Mention Award

      (Best and Worst Movie from the Honorable and Dishonorable Mention Category)

      Best – Interstellar

      Worst — The Reluctant Debutante

      For last year’s Gold Sally Awards, there was only the Dishonorable Mention Award. That’s because I didn’t see enough movies to include an honorable mention category. With the honorable mention category returning in 2024, the Honorable Mention Award is also coming back! Science fiction stories about space exploration will typically emphasize the thrills and wonder of the galaxy. This can make it easy for a movie’s audience to get caught up in how adventurous and exciting outer space can seem. In Interstellar, a major focus is space travel’s effect on human beings. So, themes of family, sacrifice, and the price of scientific achievement are woven into the script. That, along with quality acting performances and impressive special effects, is why I liked Interstellar!

      Out of all the movies that ended up in the dishonorable mention category, I had the highest expectations for The Reluctant Debutante. This is because I not only reviewed the film for The John Saxon Blogathon, there was some well-known talent involved with the project. Unfortunately, the 1958 movie fell short of those expectations. The Reluctant Debutante was a premise driven story that felt longer than one hour and thirty-four minutes, due to the jokes being drawn-out. It also didn’t help how some story ideas were overlooked. When I reviewed the 1958 film, I shared how movies from the 1950s are covered so infrequently on 18 Cinema Lane. So, it’s disappointing when a production from the ‘50s is weaker than expected.

      The Hallmark Hall of Fame Award

      (Movie That Feels Like It Belongs in the Hallmark Hall of Fame Collection)

      Hallmark’s Frankenstein

      There are different kinds of stories in the Hallmark Hall of Fame collection. One kind of story is adaptations of pre-existing literature. Sometimes, “classic” literature became Hallmark Hall of Fame presentations, like The Secret Garden and A Tale of Two Cities. When these adaptations are good, they can be an immersive experience. This is how I would describe Hallmark’s Frankenstein! Due to the combination of screenwriting, acting performances, set design, and costume design, the movie made me feel like I was transported to another time and place. I also appreciate how close to the source material the 2004 television film is. Looking back on Hallmark’s Frankenstein and the Hallmark Hall of Fame collection, I’m actually surprised Mary Shelley’s novel wasn’t adapted into a Hallmark Hall of Fame project. Everything I said is why I chose Hallmark’s Frankenstein for the Hallmark Hall of Fame Award!

      The “Based on a Book I Haven’t Read Yet” Award

      (Movie Based on Source Material I Have Not Yet Read)

      I Am David

      Movies that won the “Based on a Book I Haven’t Read Yet” Award were first placed on a best films of the year list. I Am David is continuing that tradition! The 2004 film earned the top spot on my best movies list of 2024. This is the second time a number one movie of the year received the “Based on a Book I Haven’t Read Yet” Award! After I reviewed I Am David, I learned the movie was based on a book. I’m not sure how affective the story’s plot twists will be, as I already know what they are because I saw the film. However, I’d still be interested in reading I Am David someday!

      The Standing Ovation Award

      (Character Most Deserving of Receiving Their Full Potential)

      Scorpio from Christmas on Division Street

      When the Gold Sally Awards presented the Standing Ovation Award, the recipients were characters who should have received their “standing ovation”, but were denied that for various reasons. Scorpio (from Christmas on Division Street) actively worked toward getting where he wanted to go. As I said during the They Deserve an Award Award, Scorpio had limited appearances in the 1991 made-for-TV movie. Despite that, the audience learned enough about him to know what he had gone through. During this limited period of time, Scorpio attempts to overcome his obstacles. While I won’t spoil Christmas on Division Street, I will say those attempts earned Scorpio the Standing Ovation Award!

      Have fun at the movies!

      Sally Silverscreen