Though this piece of movie news isn’t actually “movie news”, it does involve movie theaters. Therefore, this month’s Word on the Street story provides an interesting tidbit of news. Originally reported on February 23rd by Eurovoix News, the Spanish theater chain, Cinesa, has agreed to present Eurovision’s Grand Final in their theaters. With tickets becoming available on April 1st and continuing this screening for a seventh year, Cinesa is carrying their tradition of bringing Eurovision to the contest’s Spanish fans. Over the years, I’ve heard of sporting events and theatrical productions being broadcast in cinemas. There have even been concerts recorded in a documentary style and screened at theaters. But this is the first time I have heard Eurovision being shown in a movie theater. Spain is certainly capitalizing on their presence in the competition, as Spain is not only competing in Eurovision’s Grand Final, the Spanish band, Megara, will be representing San Marino. Cinesa’s decision to present Eurovision’s Grand Final makes me hope fellow Eurovision participating countries are inspired to provide experiences like this for their Eurovision fans!
When I write a movie review, I typically discuss what I liked and didn’t like about a movie, as well as summing up my thoughts in an overall impression. But for the 6th So Bad It’s Good Blogathon, I’m taking a different approach for this review. Readers of 18 Cinema Lane will know how long I’ve been searching for my “so bad it’s good” movie. Last year, when I wrote about Jesse James Meets Frankenstein’s Daughter, I mentioned how I giggled a few times while watching the film. This was taken as a step in the right direction to finding my “so bad it’s good” title! For the aforementioned 6th So Bad It’s Good Blogathon, my original intent was to choose a movie that was built on a gimmick. Then I remembered how I found Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Heartache and Homecoming so bad, it was, at times, unintentionally funny. I also recalled how the 2022 project was actually a sequel to the 2018 film, Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Exes and Oh No’s. Now that I’ve seen both films, I can, honestly, say the 2018 movie was so bad, it was, at times, unintentionally funny, though not as much as the sequel. So, in this review, I will provide examples of why Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Exes and Oh No’s is so bad, it’s unintentionally funny at times!
When I discussed Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Heartache and Homecoming in my worst movies of 2023 list, I mentioned how even though the protagonist is a veterinarian, she didn’t have to hold an animal every time a scene takes place at the veterinary clinic. This flaw constantly reminded the audience of the protagonist’s profession, making those parts of the script seem unnecessarily repetitive. When Dr. Amy Bradford first visits her veterinary clinic with her friend, Bethany, in Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Exes and Oh No’s, it makes sense to show Amy with a bearded dragon. That scene establishes Amy’s role in the town and the story itself. But after the initial introduction, Amy is, once again, shown holding animals, whether Bethany is visiting the clinic or Amy is talking on the phone with her friends. It seems like the creative team behind Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Exes and Oh No’s didn’t have confidence in their audience to remember Amy’s job. Personally, I found this flaw funny because of how frequent it was.
Any movie will have its fair share of production related errors. But in Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Exes and Oh No’s, several production errors were more obvious. Remember when I said Amy held an animal every time she was shown in her veterinary clinic? While on the phone with Bethany, Amy holds a brown rabbit with tall ears. A few seconds later, Amy is then holding a white rabbit with floppy ears. When Bethany and Amy first go to the veterinary clinic, both women drink a mug of tea. Before clinking mugs, Bethany is holding her mug by its handle in her right hand. After clinking mugs, she’s now holding the mug on its side with that same right hand. As she’s putting the mug to her lips, Bethany’s right hand returns to the mug’s handle. Toward the end of the movie, the villain escapes in a getaway van. One scene shows the villain entering the van and closing the door before it moves. The scene after that, the van drives away with the villain’s door open.
These three screenshots illustrate a production error I described in this review. Screenshots taken by me, Sally Silverscreen. Images created by Glass House Distribution
Not Understanding How Things Work
As I talked about in my 2023 edition of my worst movies of the year list, the script for Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Heartache and Homecoming reminded me of The Cookie Mobster, with the screenwriters not displaying an understanding for how some things worked. The example I brought up was how Game Boy Color video game consoles were incorporated into the story. Similarly, in Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Exes and Oh No’s, the screenwriters repeated the same mistake as the 2022 film. One glaring example takes place as a character tries to use their cell phone. A volunteer at the protagonist’s church is about to watch a livestream video from her “smart” phone, with the video starting in a few seconds. The woman sitting next to her suggests she watches the video on the television that happens to be in the room. Confused by what the woman is requesting, the livestream viewer asks if it’s possible to do that with a phone. The woman then grabs the viewer’s phone, presses the phone’s touchscreen a few times, then the video magically appears on the television. It should be noted how the television was turned off prior to the woman turning the livestream video on the television. Cell phones in 2018 (when Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Exes and Oh No’s was released) contain more advanced technology than cell phones from previous years. However, they are not “smart” enough to automatically turn on a television and connect to the television without the use of connecting wires or a remote control.
In this review so far, I’ve addressed some of the issues with the movie’s screenwriting. One flaw in this department is how the dialogue is written. There are some scenes where a character is supposed to deliver a strength filled line meant to be taken seriously. Due to the screenwriting, though, these lines don’t contain that emotional impact, causing them to sound funnier than intended. When Bethany visits a local real estate agent, she meets the realtor and his ex-wife. During Bethany’s visit, the realtor and his ex-wife get into an argument. After the realtor mentions how he should have fired his ex-wife, his ex-wife reminds him how that’s not possible by stating, “but I got half this company in the divorce settlement”. In an attempt to get the last word, the realtor replies, “Well, at least I got the cat”. Later that same day, Bethany is confronted at the local church by the villain. When the villain tries to intimidate Bethany to help them leave town, she utilizes some martial arts techniques to retrieve the villain’s gun and knock the villain to the ground. The villain then asks Bethany where she learned to fight. Bethany replies, in a serious tone, “I was homeschooled”.
Another issue with the movie’s script was how the dialogue was delivered. There were times when an actor’s line delivery was so unnatural, it sounded robotic. Toward the beginning of the film, Bethany is discouraged by her inability to bake a pie. Her mother reassures her by saying “No, it’s not. You’re much better with people than you are with pies. I mean, seriously, I have never met anyone that can connect with every single person that she meets. And that’s a gift”. While Bethany’s mother gives her daughter a nice, encouraging comment, the limited use of vocal inflections and over-enunciating make this comment sound less genuine. When Bethany’s friend, Grace, visits Bethany’s family’s orchard, Grace reveals how she has worked in the Mount Hideaway facility for the past two weeks. Shocked by this piece of news, Bethany responds by saying, “You’re working at the classified facility outside my hometown?” This line delivery is so flat and over-enunciated, it sounds like Bethany is talking in slow-motion.
Whether a tv movie network production or an independent film, these types of movies are typically granted smaller budgets. This financial restriction means some film-making techniques could be out of reach, such as time-consuming and expensive special effects. If computer-created special effects are applied to a film with financial limitations, those effects could show the film’s budget. As Bethany is taking her burnt pie out of the oven, smoke appears to be coming out of the oven. But as Bethany is trying to fan the smoke away from the pie, it’s pretty clear the smoke is a computer-created effect resting atop the image and likely added in post-production. While Bethany is reminiscing on the past, she recalls how she and her friend, Jamie, spotted an abandoned car. This abandoned car looked too glossy for the long shot of the nearby river. In fact, the car appeared to be poorly photoshopped into the scene during the film’s editing stage. Because the car wasn’t blended into the scene well, its inclusion in the movie felt so jarring, it was distracting.
If you look at this picture’s bottom right hand corner, you will see how the car looks like it was probably added in the editing stage of this movie. Image created by Glass House Distribution
As Bethany pays her church a visit, she goes to the homeschool resource center. In this room, there is a poster that reads, “Mistakes are proof that you are trying”. This quote is how to sum up Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Exes and Oh No’s. The 2018 picture is filled with production and film-making mistakes. These range from the obvious (such as a poorly photoshopped car) to the subtle (like no display of understanding for how technology works). However, these mistakes are proof the movie’s creative team tried to visually tell a story. Making a film is a time-consuming and financially-consuming endeavor. This creative endeavor also consists of a lot of moving parts, requiring various people to oversee different departments of the film-making process. Going back to Mount Hideaway Mysteries: Exes and Oh No’s, I wouldn’t go so far as to choose this project as my “so bad it’s good” movie. But, while watching the 2018 film, I did find myself laughing more than I did watching Jesse James Meets Frankenstein’s Daughter. Therefore, I will take that as another step in the right direction to finally finding my “so bad it’s good” movie!
In the We Heart Siblings Stories Week event, hosted by Hamlette (from Hamlette’s Soliloquy), I wanted to review a movie that was more underrated. While searching for the perfect title, I discovered a list on IMDB about the best movies about siblings. On that list, the 1999 movie, The Deep End of the Ocean, was featured. Back in 2021, when I reviewed Taming Andrew, I remember Gill, from Realweegiemidget Reviews, recommending The Deep End of the Ocean for a future review. Since I try to write about a recommended picture every now and then and since the 1999 film fit the blogathon’s criteria, I found the perfect title to discuss! Similar to Taming Andrew, The Deep End of the Ocean revolves around a family whose child was kidnapped and eventually returned. Since the missing child in the 1999 movie has siblings, those children’s perspective are included in the story. So, without further delay, let’s begin this review of The Deep End of the Ocean.
The Deep End of the Ocean poster created by Columbia Pictures, Mandalay Entertainment, Via Rosa Productions, and Sony Pictures Releasing
Things I like about the film:
The acting: If a story includes a teenage character, it can be easy for that character to be written as an angsty or rebellious stereotype. But in The Deep End of the Ocean, Vincent never seemed like a stereotype or caricature. Through Jonathan Jackson’s performance, Vincent came across as a realistic individual, trying his best to bottle up his emotions while putting on a brave face. After Ben/Sam was identified as Beth and Pat’s son, Vincent reveals to Beth how he has seen Ben/Sam around their neighborhood. When Beth questions him about this occurrence, Vincent’s demeanor is very nonchalant. His face displays a relaxed look and the tone of his voice sounds annoyed. But as the conversation continued, Vincent’s tone changed to irritation, his words sharply leaving his mouth. His eyes also took on an intense stare, which sometimes happens when Vincent is included in more dramatic scenes. This portrayal of Vincent was consistent with his younger self, keeping his feelings to himself while also trying to keep his family together. The subtle expressions from Jonathan Jackson do a good job at showing how emotions can trickle out of a character who has bottled up their emotions for so long.
Treat Williams is an actor I’m familiar with because of his inclusion in the Hallmark community. Through his involvement in projects such as Chesapeake Shores, his emotions and expressions have always come across as genuine. This is also the case for his portrayal of Pat in The Deep End of the Ocean. One morning, Pat brings up the idea of growing their family with his wife, Beth. At the start of this conversation, Pat appears happy, even adopting a playful tone in his voice. When Beth, portrayed by Michelle Pfeiffer, explains why she doesn’t want more children, Pat gradually becomes frustrated. This frustration grows into anger, with both Pat and Beth yelling at each other. The way this argument unfolds feels realistic, each character bringing up good points with a sense of honesty. Because of the acting abilities and on-screen chemistry of Michelle and Treat, scenes like this one don’t feel over-the-top or melodramatic.
Because this story revolves around the disappearance of Ben/Sam, I need to talk about Ryan Merriman’s performance. When I reviewed Taming Andrew, I said casting a young actor or actress who could, talent-wise, carry most of the movie is essential when a story revolves around a young character. The difference between Taming Andrew and The Deep End of the Ocean is how the whole family deals with Ben’s/Sam’s kidnapping in the 1999 movie, allowing Ryan is carry only part of the film. Despite this, Ryan still brought a good performance to the table, with a variety of emotions and expressions displayed. A great example was when Ben/Sam plays basketball with Vincent. The game starts off as a friendly duel, all smiles and playful banter. As the game continues, Ben/Sam becomes confused and even afraid as Vincent’s demeanor changes. Slowly but surely, Vincent allows his frustrations and irritation to get the better of him, going so far as to accidently hit Ben/Sam in the face. Ryan’s acting talents help Ben’s/Sam’s interactions with various characters create an interesting dynamic within the story.
Showing the process of searching and locating a missing person: As I just mentioned in this review, the difference between Taming Andrew and The Deep End of the Ocean is how the whole family deals with Ben’s/Sam’s kidnapping in the 1999 movie. Another major difference between the two films is how The Deep End of the Ocean shows the entire process of searching and locating a missing person. When Ben/Sam is first reported missing, the story addresses the sense of urgency in the 24 hours to about a week after Ben/Sam is kidnapped. A clock is routinely shown to indicate how much time has passed. A television interview and a cover of People magazine show the desperation Ben’s/Sam’s family has in finding Ben/Sam. Even the community surrounding Ben’s/Sam’s family come together to create posters and make phone calls. Even though Ben/Sam is found almost ten years later, this part of the process is also taken seriously, from addressing the need for a search warrant to placing Ben/Sam in a foster home before reintroducing him to his family. Because this entire process was shown in the movie, it gives the audience a sense of closure.
Featuring different perspectives: Like I’ve been saying in this review, The Deep End of the Ocean addresses how the whole family deals with Ben’s/Sam’s kidnapping. Each member of Ben’s/Sam’s family handles his disappearance differently throughout the course of the story. Beth is filled with grief over the situation. From giving up on her photography career to staying in bed most of the day, she carries a great sadness in her mind and heart. Meanwhile, Pat tries desperately to find the silver lining in life. He continues to work at a local restaurant while maintaining his dream of opening his own restaurant. Young Vincent is troubled by what happened, as well as becoming overshadowed by his little brother. He bottles up his feelings and tries to hold his family together. With the strength of the acting performances and the screenwriting, the dynamic among the family becomes fascinating to watch.
An underutilized perspective: When Ben/Sam was kidnapped, Kerry was just a baby. Years later, Kerry is confused by her mother’s, Beth’s, reaction after a chance encounter with Ben/Sam. This is because she has no recollection of the events surrounding her brother’s disappearance. Because of everything I just said, Kerry’s perspective didn’t add much to the overall story. In order to utilize Kerry’s perspective, I wish she was written as either a teenager or slightly younger than Vincent at the time of Ben’s/Sam’s kidnapping.
A few continuity errors: After the time jump from the late ‘80s to “nine years later”, Vincent is reintroduced as a sixteen-year-old with long hair. In the very next scene he’s featured in, Vincent is shown with short hair. No explanation is provided for the sudden change in hair style and none of the other members in Vincent’s family seem to notice this change. Yes, Officer Candy Bliss mentioned to Beth how Vincent needs a haircut. But that doesn’t explain this error in continuity. Even though this flaw was a minor one in The Deep End of the Ocean, the specific continuity issue I described is a glaring one.
A random dramatic moment: Toward the end of The Deep End of the Ocean, Vincent is arrested. To me, this dramatic moment felt random. I’m aware how this film is based on a book I haven’t read. But according to what the movie shows, Vincent never came across as a character who was a trouble-maker or someone seeking attention. Jonathan Jackson’s portrayal of Vincent shows this is a character that is not a stereotypical teenager displaying “teenage angst”. With the inclusion of Vincent’s arrest, however, it almost seems like that part of the story is contributing to the angsty and rebellious teenager stereotype.
Throughout this review, I’ve been comparing and contrasting Taming Andrew and The Deep End of the Ocean. That’s because I was recommended The Deep End of the Ocean when I reviewed Taming Andrew. After seeing (and writing about) both films, it seems the only similarity these titles have is how the story revolves around a missing child being reunited with their family. If anything, The Deep End of the Ocean shares similar ideas and themes with The Face on the Milk Carton. Speaking specifically about the 1999 movie, this is a production I could take seriously. The acting performances were strong, creating a dynamic among the characters that was interesting to watch unfold. The screenwriting allowed the story and subjects within them to be honestly and respectfully told. But because of how serious the subject matter is, The Deep End of the Ocean does not have a high re-watchability rate. However, the film provides a mostly complete picture of the emotional rollercoaster the story’s family experienced.
Overall score: 7.3 out of 10
Have you seen The Deep End of the Ocean? Have you read the movie’s source material? Tell me in the comment section below!
For my review of No Postage Necessary, my original plan was to publish it on Valentine’s Day. This decision was made because, last year, I wrote about Evan Williams’ Hallmark film, The National Tree, in honor of the Christmas season. While working on my aforementioned review, I was also finding research for my upcoming Sally Solves a Mystery article. However, locating research for my Sally Solves a Mystery entry took longer than I expected. That means I ran out of time to publish my review of No Postage Necessary as originally intended. But I haven’t reviewed a movie since last week, so that’s why I’m still publishing my No Postage Necessary review. When it comes to “chick flicks” and “rom coms”, Hallmark has capitalized on both genres. But Hallmark is not the “end all, be all” when it comes to romantic comedies. Will No Postage Necessary mirror the quality viewers come to expect from Hallmark? Keep reading my review to find out!
George Blagden’s performance: While I liked the acting throughout No Postage Necessary, the strongest performance, in my opinion, came from George Blagden. That, along with how George is the reason why I sought out this movie, is why I’ll be highlighting George’s performance in this review. The most notable aspect of George’s portrayal of the protagonist, Sam, is how effortless he makes his performance appear. Toward the beginning of the film, Sam is a pessimistic man, using sarcasm to combat disappointment. During these moments, the sarcasm rolls off George’s tongue, with the delivery being sharp. As the story progresses and Sam becomes attracted to the film’s female protagonist, Josie, his attitude begins to soften. George adopts a calm, yet playful demeanor to show Sam’s changing persona. The aforementioned effortlessness, along with George’s ability to readily change emotions and expressions, allows Sam’s transformation to come across as believable!
The on-screen chemistry: For any romantic comedy to work, there needs to be, at least, some on-screen chemistry between the lead actor and actress. If this on-screen chemistry is strong, it believably sells the protagonists’ romantic relationship to the audience. As I previously mentioned in this review, Sam becomes attracted to Josie. Throughout the story, Josie and Sam spend time together and eventually fall in love. While interacting with each other, I could sense on-screen chemistry between George Blagden and Charleene Closshey. These interactions were not only very sweet, but it seemed like their characters developed a sense of understanding between each other. I also want to point out how natural Sam and Josie’s interactions were in No Postage Necessary. The acting abilities of George and Charleene worked in this movie’s favor!
The messages and themes: Similar to other romantic comedies, especially from Hallmark, there were some good messages and themes within the script of No Postage Necessary. One major theme is taking responsibility for one’s own actions. Prior to the events of this movie, Sam was arrested and faced accountability for the crime he committed. He is on probation during the events of the film. But when he discovered a letter from Josie, Sam takes the initiative the turn his life around. He seeks out better employment so he can prove how self-sufficient he is. Sam even purchases a new car, trying to give Josie a good impression of himself. Because of the screenwriting and acting performances, this theme was delivered well in this movie!
The cyber security/Bitcoin subplot: George’s character, Sam, is a computer hacker who was arrested for his crime. Despite his criminal past, he still believes he could use his skills for good. Throughout the movie, Sam is accused by Agent Ames of stealing Bitcoins, even though Sam has never worked with Bitcoins before. While I’m aware Sam needed a conflict to work through, as well as a reason to change his ways, the overall tone of this subplot clashed with the cozy, sweet nature of the main romance plot. It felt like a Hallmark Channel movie tried to incorporate a Lifetime movie conflict into their script. This aforementioned subplot also, at times, seemed to serve a talking point for bigger, real-world issues. That prevented the film from completely adopting escapism.
Underutilized conflicts: In one of Josie’s letters, Josie shares how she wants to enroll her daughter, Daisy, into a prestigious school for gifted children. This decision was sparked by Daisy’s inability to socialize with her peers, to the point she is physically harming other students. But during the movie, Josie spends more time talking about what she wants to do instead of creating a plan to accomplish her goals. I know achieving goals and dreams takes time as well as determination. But in an hour and forty-four-minute film that prioritizes the main romance plot and the cyber security/Bitcoin subplot, this is one example of a conflict becoming underutilized.
Omission of George’s musical talents: When I published my editorial about why George Blagden and Evan Williams should go to Eurovision 2024, one of my arguments was George and Evan’s musical talents. I highlighted how both Evan and George are not only musically gifted as individuals, they also sound good together. With that said, I feel it was a missed opportunity not to include George’s musical talents in No Postage Necessary. In this movie, Josie shares with Sam how she has dreamed of becoming a singer. There’s even a scene where Josie performs with her former band at a local pub. If the creative team behind the movie knew they would be incorporating music into their production, they should have given George an opportunity to perform at least one acoustic musical number. Even a cover of Stevie Wonder’s “Signed, Sealed, Delivered (I’m Yours)” playing over a scene would have made sense.
Hallmark has gained a reputation of having some of their movies look and feel too similar to each other. This creative choice has caused viewers like myself to crave creativity and uniqueness from the network. No Postage Necessary tries to give their romantic comedy a different identity from other movies of this genre, including those from Hallmark. While I appreciate this effort at creativity, the tones of the main romantic plot and the cyber security/Bitcoin subplot clashed with one another, causing them to feel mismatched. When the movie focuses on the romantic plot, the story feels reminiscent of a Hallmark production. Even though there is cozy, sweetness shared between the protagonists and the messages and themes within the script are good, the creative team behind No Postage Necessary still found a way to tell their own story without appearing to copy Hallmark’s homework. If you’re a fan of George Blagden or have enjoyed his performance in other programs he has starred in, I’d recommend watching this film for his performance!
Overall score: 6.8 out of 10
Have you seen No Postage Necessary? Are there any romantic comedies you’d like to read about on my blog? Tell me in the comment section!
Last month, in my post about what my readers could look forward to in 2024, I stated how I was taking a break from the Buzzwordathon readathon. But I also promised the reviews for October, November, and December’s books from 2023. As a blogger of my word, I am finally publishing the last three reviews of the previous year’s Buzzwordathon! Since I did read these books, but didn’t finish them within their respective months, I will consider these readathon challenges a “fail”. With this article published after Buzzwordathon 2023, these reviews will be shorter.
Title: The Witcher: The Last Wish by Andrzej Sapkowski
Theme: Magic words
The Witcher: The Last Wish is a collection of short stories that serve as an introduction to Geralt and the world around him. Even though I learned quite a bit while reading this book, it felt like I spent most of the book getting to know everyone but Geralt. In fact, there was one portion of an overarching short story where Geralt exposition dumped his entire life story. But there were parts of the book I did like, such as the magic system and the pacing of the action scenes. I also thought the politics within the story’s world were intriguing.
One of David Baldacci’s strengths is creating literary worlds that are memorable enough to stick with the reader. This is achieved through strong descriptive imagery and world building. These writing techniques were applied to One Good Deed, creating a landscape that I could picture as I read the book. I also liked the banter between the characters, as it was quippy and clever. The protagonist, Archer, did amateur detective work in the story, but it wasn’t as consistent as I expected. Because One Good Deed is a slow-burn, character-driven story, patience is required from the reader.
A Song for Jeffreyis a story that relies more on a premise than a plot. That, along with serious topics being incorporated, but not explored, in the story prevent the book from containing as much depth as other middle grade titles. However, there are good lessons found throughout the text, from how to be a good friend to trying to find the positives in life. Jeffrey is the best character from this book, as his personality is down-to-earth and friendly. While Dodie, the protagonist, means well and works through her flaws, she is kind of insensitive for most of the book. For about half the book, Dodie has a selfish, entitled attitude.
Overall score: 3 out of 5 stars
Have fun reading!
Sally Silverscreen
Disclaimer: The Witcher: The Last Wish, One Good Deed, and A Song for Jeffrey contain subject matter that may not be suitable for some readers. Reader discretion is encouraged.
It’s been stated before on 18 Cinema Lane that my Hallmark related content is some of my most popular content. I’ve also mentioned how the mystery genre is the most popular one on my blog. Whenever Hallmark releases a mystery film through Hallmark Movies & Mysteries, that has, usually, been a recipe for success for my movie reviews. With all that said, I chose to write about the second Hallmark Movies & Mysteries film to premiere in 2024; Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers! In my review of True Justice: Family Ties, I brought up how Hallmark’s newest mysteries boasted distinct identities. With Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers, it is Hallmark’s first historical fiction mystery title! As I stated in my Word on the Street article about CrimeTime: Freefall, these new mystery movies from Hallmark Movies & Mysteries have the potential to start a new series. So, let’s take a carriage ride and solve a mystery, as I review Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers!
The acting: Once upon a time, Ali Skovbye starred on When Calls the Heart, portraying Abigail’s daughter, Becky. By appearing on the show, Ali was given the opportunity the work alongside various actors and actresses. While watching Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers, I could tell Ali’s television experiences worked in her favor! Throughout the movie, Ali was able to maintain good on-screen chemistry and camaraderie with the other cast members! After Emma’s half-brother, Brady, is arrested, Emma visits Brady in jail. During their visit, Brady appears frightened, fear displayed in his eyes and concern woven into his speech. Not only is concern seen in Emma’s eyes, a mixture of concern and reassurance can be heard in her voice. Any time Brady and Emma interact, Ali Skovbye and James Drew Dean’s on-screen camaraderie shown through, thanks to their acting talents! In the film, Emma interacts with her friend, Harriet. Portrayed by Amira Anderson, Emma and Harriet’s friendship appears genuine, making the audience believe these characters were friends long before the events of the movie. Once again, the on-screen camaraderie worked because of Ali and Amira’s acting abilities!
The wardrobe: Attention to detail can make or break any movie, especially a historical/period film. One way attention to detail can be showcased is through the wardrobe. Emma is surrounded by elite society in Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers. This social status is reflected in the characters’ attire. However, how wealthy a character is can be found in specific details. While Emma is connected to the Vanderbilt family, she doesn’t enjoy the financial benefits of being a Vanderbilt. At a debutante party, Emma wears a simple blue gown, displaying smaller details such as a lace collar, sparkly appliqués, and a little diamond necklace. Emma’s cousin, Gertrude, is also a wealthy relative. But her dress is a light pink gown covered in lace and featuring bigger puffy sleeves. Gertrude not only wore a bigger diamond necklace, she also wore a diamond tiara.
The set design: Wardrobe is not the only department where a film’s creative team can display attention to detail. In historical fiction or period specific movies, the set design can give the audience the illusion they traveled back in time. A creative team’s attention to detail can successfully pull off this illusion, as well as feature interesting design choices! In some of the homes in Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers, stained-glass windows could either be seen in the background or in exterior shots. At Emma’s house, beautiful stained-glass windows featuring grapes were shown in the kitchen. Some homes also included fireplaces, boasting unique styles and designs. At Uncle Cornelius’ office, engraved wood patterns framed the fireplace. In another house, mosaic tiles surrounded the fireplace.
Keeping track of who’s who: In any mystery story, there are a collection of characters. Most of these characters serve as potential suspects for the audience to speculate over. An abundance of characters were featured in Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers. But some of these characters did not make frequent appearances in the film, with their names being brought up more than they were shown on screen. It should also be noted how this movie had a larger cast. All this made it difficult to keep track of who’s who.
A dialogue heavy story: Dialogue is an important component of any film. For the mystery genre, dialogue can contain clues and necessary information about the film’s case. In Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers, there were few physical clues included in the story. This forced the characters to rely on dialogue to solve the mystery. The movie having a dialogue heavy story also forces the audience to pay attention to what the characters are saying. If an audience member misses one piece of dialogue, they will be confused by what is happening in the film.
A low sense of urgency: There is, typically, a sense of urgency in murder mystery stories. This is because the characters express desire to catch the guilty party quickly, in order to prevent more people from getting hurt. While there is a murder mystery included in Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers, the overall sense of urgency was low. Emma’s involvement in elite society is prioritized throughout the story. The low sense of urgency in the movie also caused the story to feel a bit drawn out.
Because Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers is Hallmark’s first historical fiction mystery title, it allows the movie to stand out among the network’s other mystery programs. While this uniqueness can encourage viewers to check the movie out, the true question lies in if this uniqueness can serve a movie series. It’s unknown at this time if Gilded Newport Mysteries will inspire more than one film. But only speaking about Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers, the 2024 release emphasizes style over substance. It’s obvious the creative team behind the movie cared about the presentation of their project. The finer details of the set and costume design allowed the film to feel immersive, giving the audience the illusion they traveled back in time. When it comes to the mystery itself, however, it could have been stronger. Keeping track of who’s who and a dialogue heavy story could leave some viewers confused as the movie moves along. The low sense of urgency within the story makes the film kind of feel drawn out. If there is another chapter given to Gilded Newport Mysteries, I’d like to see a crossover between Gilded Newport Mysteries and A Biltmore Christmas! Since both titles have some connection to Vanderbilt, it would be interesting to see the protagonists of both movies interacting with each other!
Overall score: 6-6.1 out of 10
Have you seen Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers? Would you like to see Gilded Newport Mysteries develop into a series? Let me know in the comment section!
For this Blog Follower Dedication Review, I wanted to step away from the realm of Hallmark movies. I do enjoy reviewing Hallmark productions and writing about Hallmark related topics. But with my recent review of True Justice: Family Ties, my list of the top ten Hallmark movies that should have received a sequel, and my Word on the Street story about CrimeTime: Freefall, I wanted to offer my readers other cinematic titles through my articles. I just checked out a movie titled A Horse Called Wish. Though I have written about “horse films” before, these types of films are rarely featured on 18 Cinema Lane. Another reason why I chose to write about A Horse Called Wish is because the story not only takes place in Mauritius, the movie was filmed there as well. I haven’t heard of many stories or movies from this African country. In fact, A Horse Called Wish is probably the first I’ve come across. With that said, I wanted to see how a more unique perspective would impact the landscape of the “horse film”!
Avoiding “horse movie” cliches: Within the realm of “horse movies”, there are certain cliches found within each story. While some of these cliches can be found in A Horse Called Wish, the creative team behind the film avoided other cliches. One cliché from “horse movies” is the “misunderstood horse” cliché, where the horse in question is either a wild horse that would rather be set free by the protagonist or the horse is a descendent of wild horses and has a spirit that can’t be tamed. While the titular horse, Wish, is misunderstood, he is perceived that way for different reasons. I won’t be discussing those reasons because I don’t want to spoil the movie for any of my readers who are interested in watching it. In “horse movies”, one of three landscapes will be commonly featured in the story. These types of landscapes are either desert, mountainous, or the “manicured lawn” (where riding academies or stables are surrounded by lawns and foliage that appear well-cared for). Since A Horse Called Wish takes place in and was filmed in Mauritius, the landscape surrounding the characters and horses is tropical. Through long and medium shots, volcanic mountains, green fields, and even glimpses of the ocean display the natural beauty Mauritius has to offer. This creative decision also gave A Horse Called Wish a unique identity among other “horse movies”!
Hannah Gonera’s performance: No matter the genre, it’s important for a story’s main character to be a likable individual with a good personality. Cindy Moreau, the protagonist of A Horse Called Wish, was able to be this type of character thanks to Hannah Gonera’s performance! Hannah’s expressions and reactions were fluid, appearing seamlessly throughout the movie. The strength of Hannah’s acting abilities made her portrayal of Cindy seem realistic! Cindy’s interactions with other characters proves this point. Sometimes, Cindy confides in her boss from the food truck where they work together. These scenes are reminiscent of Daniel and Mr. Miyagi from The Karate Kid, as Cindy is guided by her mentor. Whenever her boss gives useful advice or encouraging words, Cindy always looks appreciative. From being thankful over receiving a job interview to being disappointed by her mother’s refusal for Cindy to work at a local riding academy, Cindy’s emotions came across as genuine.
The messages and themes: “Horse movies” will typically include themes and messages that younger viewers can learn from and older viewers can appreciate. Within A Horse Called Wish, there are some good messages and themes that were incorporated in the story well! Cindy is passionate about equine sports, from constantly reading a book about horses to frequently visiting a local riding academy. Toward the beginning of the movie, she accepts a job as a stable-hand. I once heard a quote about dreams not working unless you do. As montages of Cindy cleaning the stables and taking care of the horses are shown on screen, she lives by that quote as she creates a good foundation of being a good equestrian. I also heard a quote about finding a job that makes you look forward to go to work. Through another montage, viewers can see Cindy excited to go to the riding academy, as she displays a smile on her face every time she wakes up in the morning. The message of actively working toward dreams and the theme of finding a job that makes you happy can give viewers advice to apply to their lives.
White horse image created by Gabor Palla at freeimages.com. “FreeImages.com/Gabor Palla.”
What I didn’t like about the film:
Contradictory dialogue: In A Horse Called Wish, there were a few times when the dialogue contradicted the characters’ surroundings. Toward the start of the movie, two riding academy students (Elizabeth and Charlotte) visit the food truck Cindy works at. This food truck has restaurant space near the truck for patrons to sit down and eat their meal. While Cindy is waiting on their table, Charlotte claims the salt shaker has fallen on the floor. However, the restaurant space is outdoors, so the salt shaker fell on the ground. Later in the movie, Elizabeth is trying to have a conversation with her father. In order to quickly finish the conversation, he tells his daughter to go home and go to bed. Based on the lighting surrounding these characters, it appears this conversation took place in the afternoon.
Limited scenes of equine performance: One of the staples of a “horse movie” is the inclusion of equine performance. Whether it’s equine competitions, horses performing stunts, or simply seeing horses jumping, these types of equine performance can look impressive on screen and can provide a story with action and excitement. While there was equine performance found in A Horse Called Wish, these moments were far and few between. Since the story’s riding academy prioritizes the English riding style, there is a show-jumping competition featured in the film. However, this competition serves as the story’s climax, meaning it doesn’t take place until the movie is almost over. Most of the time, horses are shown trotting or walking in a canter.
Too many story elements: As I mentioned earlier in this review, Cindy is passionate about equine sports, willing to work to make her dreams a reality. But this serves as only one element of the overall story. Other story elements are included in the script, such as Cindy dealing with bullying and Cindy’s mother looking for employment. Because of how many story elements were featured in the film, some parts of the story happened too quickly. It also caused the overall story to feel bogged down. With that said, I wish A Horse Called Wish had one main plot and two subplots.
Before I share my thoughts on A Horse Called Wish, I want to thank every follower of 18 Cinema Lane! With these special Blog Follower Dedication Reviews, I always try to find movies that my readers will enjoy and films that expand their cinematic horizons. I look forward to finding more titles my readers are excited to read about! Now, back to talking about A Horse Called Wish. While watching this movie, I could tell the creative team behind the movie had their hearts in the right place. With some of their creative decisions, A Horse Called Wish brought a more unique perspective and identity to the world of “horse films”. But the 2019 film shared qualities of other “horse films”, such as good messages and themes. A Horse Called Wish does have its flaws. These flaws, like limited scenes of equine performance, held the movie back from being a stronger production. What I do appreciate is how this film gave me an opportunity to watch a piece of cinema created in Mauritius. With the Summer Olympics on the horizon, it makes me wonder if, one day, we’ll see an equestrian from Mauritius winning a medal on the Olympic stage?
Overall score: 6 out of 10
Have you seen A Horse Called Wish? Are there any “horse films” you’d recommend for a future review? Let me know in the comment section!
While conducting research for this year’s Sally Solves a Mystery article, I came across an interesting movie news story from the website, ComicBook. Gary Goetzman, one of the producers of the 2004 Christmas film, ThePolar Express, is eager to work on a sequel for the aforementioned movie. Despite the excitement, Gary recognizes the challenges of creating a sequel twenty years after the first film. In an article written by Brandon Davis, Gary talks about his film-making plans, stating, “But it becomes, there’s so much involved with, ‘Who’s artistic property would that be? Would that be?’ It’s just not like, ‘Hey, let’s go do another free sailing! So, they all take time and that’s okay because we don’t mind things going slowly. But that is trying to be worked out now, for sure, Polar 2. Yes.”
When I first heard of this piece of movie news, two thoughts came to mind. The first thought was how will the creative team behind a sequel to ThePolar Express prevent the film from looking dated? One reason why ThePolar Express is such a note-worthy title in cinematic history is the motion capture technology that was applied to the film. In 2004, that style of film-making was revolutionary, viewed then as “ahead of its time”. But twenty years later, some people have criticized ThePolar Express for appearing as “uncanny valley” due to how fluid technology is. The second thought was how a sequel to ThePolar Express likely won’t have long term success at the box office. 2024 will be oversaturated with sequels, with about twenty-three sequels planning to premiere in theaters. Some notable sequels received disappointing box office results in 2023, such as Fast X, Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny, and Shazam: Fury of the Gods. With that said, I think Gary Goetzman should take the money, time, and energy that would have gone toward a sequel to The Polar Express and adapt a different Christmas story.
Last September, my review of Guiding Emily became my 350th movie review! While I wanted to acknowledge this milestone, I wanted to acknowledge it by writing an article that was Hallmark related. Guiding Emily is based on a book that is the first novel in a trilogy. As of the publication of this article, Hallmark has made no announcements about the trilogy’s adaptation. The possibility of Guiding Emily receiving a sequel made me think of other Hallmark films I wish were given more than one story. That led to the creation of my list of the top ten Hallmark movies that should have received a sequel! For my list, a sequel doesn’t just mean a second part to a stand-alone story, but a continuation within an established story. Films on my list are categorized based on when they premiered. Because it’s still the beginning of 2024, I excluded Hallmark movies released in 2023, as it’s unknown at this time if Hallmark will grant any of those movies a sequel. My list is also based on my opinion, featuring titles I have seen and liked.
Long before I became a movie blogger, I saw (and liked) Ordinary Miracles. Looking back on the movie almost twenty years later, this story made me wonder what happened to the characters after the film’s events. How did Sally move forward with her life? Did Kay continue to be a judge or did she choose a new career path? What ever happened to Sally’s boyfriend? Did he ever face accountability for his actions? With this story producing so many questions, it would have been interesting to revisit some of these characters and witness how their lives changed. Though as I previously mentioned, Ordinary Miracles premiered almost twenty years ago. Therefore, it’s highly unlikely this story will receive a sequel.
2. Perfectly Prudence (2011)
Perfectly Prudence is the sequel of the 2008 movie, Dear Prudence. Despite the tonal shift between the first and second films, I remember liking both titles! The reason why Perfectly Prudence is on this list is because of the movie’s abrupt ending. Toward the end of the 2011 film, Prudence was about to tell her daughter, Annie, who her father was. Right before Prudence shared this information with Annie, the story ended. I’ve always been curious how Annie would have accepted this news. But since Perfectly Prudence premiered thirteen years ago, I don’t think that mystery will ever get solved.
3. For Love & Honor (2016)
When I think of military academies featured in entertainment media, they have, typically, appeared in a stand-alone movie or television show episode. For Love & Honor is one of these programs, as Hallmark never continued this story beyond a first chapter. With the school’s commandant and academic dean working together to save their facility, each sharing the goal of improving their students’ lives, I think there was potential for the 2016 movie to start a film, even television, series! The main story could have revolved around a group of academy faculty, including Tom Brennan and Caroline Foster, trying to solve professional and personal problems. Stories involving some of the students may have served as the series’ subplots. If For Love & Honor had led to a series, it would have differed from a program like When Calls the Heart, as an academic setting would be more prominent.
4. Cooking with Love (2018)
Cooking with Love is one of only two movies to receive a perfect score on 18 Cinema Lane! Since its premiere in 2018, I’ve always wanted to see this movie receive a sequel! Because the story focuses on the behind-the-scenes process of creating a television show, there are so many directions a second chapter could go. The moral aspects of Valentine’s Day were prioritized in Cooking with Love instead of the holiday’s aesthetic, allowing another story to be told any time of year. When this movie premiered, its viewership numbers were on the lower end of the ratings spectrum. However, if Hallmark desperately needed ideas for future films, maybe they could consider revisiting the world of Cooking with Love.
5. Royally Ever After (2018)
Royally Ever After is the best movie I saw in 2018! The film’s choice to avoid a lot of cliches and tropes from Hallmark’s royal stories left such a good impression on me! Within the film, Sara and Prince Daniel become engaged. They even entertain the idea of wedding plans toward the end of the movie. In my opinion, Hallmark missed an opportunity to turn Royally Ever After into a series. The sequel would have focused on Prince Daniel and Sara’s wedding, appropriately titled “Wedding Ever After”. Other films would chronicle the couple’s journey, boasting titles such as “Christmas Ever After” and “Family Ever After”. Had Royally Ever After become a series, it would have provided something new for Hallmark Channel, as none of Hallmark’s royal movies have received more than one film.
Royally Ever After poster created by Crown Media Family Networks and Hallmark Channel. Image found at https://www.crownmediapress.com/Shows/PRShowDetail?SiteID=142&FeedBoxID=845&NodeID=302&ShowType=&ShowTitle=Royally%20Ever%20After&IsSeries=False.
6. Wedding of Dreams (2018)
Yet another sequel joins the list! This time, it’s Wedding of Dreams, the second chapter of 2016’s Summer of Dreams! Ever since I saw the 2018 movie, I always wanted to see a third film. Likely titled “Christmas of Dreams”, the story could have prioritized Debbie and Noah’s first Christmas together. Debbie Gibson could have even created new Christmas tunes exclusively for the movie! Reflecting on this idea, I think “Christmas of Dreams” would have been a great addition to Hallmark Channel’s ‘Countdown to Christmas’ line-up. With all that said, this, in my opinion, was a missed opportunity for the network.
7. Rome in Love (2019)
Rome in Love was not only the best Hallmark movie I saw in 2019, it was one of the best movies I saw that year! Similar to A Biltmore Christmas and This Magic Moment, the story revolves around the process of making a movie. Unlike This Magic Moment, a movie premiere was not included in the story. Therefore, the characters from Rome in Love attending the premiere of the story’s film (a remake of Roman Holiday) could have served as the plot of a sequel! Along with this plot, Philip could propose to Amelia, ending the story with an engagement. Amelia’s sister, Kathryn, could come to Italy and fall in love, a story that would be the movie’s subplot. With Rome in Love being released five years ago, I don’t know what this movie’s chances are of receiving a sequel. But if Hallmark is looking for ideas for future projects, a second chapter for Rome in Love could be one of them!
8. Poisoned in Paradise: A Martha’s Vineyard Mystery (2021)
In some of Hallmark Movies & Mysteries’ series, overarching mysteries were incorporated to give viewers a reason to follow the story. In the Martha’s VineyardMysteries series, Jeff is trying to figure out who shot him when he was a detective in Boston. As the story progressed, it seemed like Jeff was one step closer to solving his mystery. But because Poisoned in Paradise: A Martha’s Vineyard Mystery was the last movie from this series to premiere, Jeff’s mystery was never resolved. The Martha’s VineyardMysteries series was abandoned by Hallmark in favor of producing stand-alone films. If the network knew they weren’t continuing the Martha’s VineyardMysteries series, they should have, at least, created one movie to give Jeff’s mystery some closure.
9. Mystery 101: Deadly History (2021)
Since the film’s release in 2021, fans of the Mystery 101 series have been curious about the cliffhanger ending of Mystery 101: Deadly History. They’ve even begged Hallmark Movies & Mysteries to create at least one more movie to resolve this mystery and provide the story with some closure. Unfortunately, the network unceremoniously cancelled the Mystery 101 series, leaving fans frustrated by the lack of answered questions. As a fan myself, I wish Hallmark Movies & Mysteries had given the Mystery 101 series a film to end the story on a strong note. The movie likely would have attracted good viewership numbers, as the Mystery 101 series was a successful series due to television ratings. Similar to what I said about Royally Ever After and Wedding of Dreams, choosing not to make one more Mystery 101 film was one of Hallmark’s missed opportunities.
10. Cut, Color, Murder (2022)
When I talked about how Poisoned in Paradise: A Martha’s Vineyard Mystery should have received a sequel, I mentioned how the Martha’s VineyardMysteries series was abandoned by Hallmark in favor of producing stand-alone films. While some of these movies have delivered interesting ideas, there are a few titles that I think could have lent themselves to a series. Cut, Color, Murder, in my opinion, has potential for more than one story. The chemistry among the cast, as well as their banter, made these characters charming. Even though I won’t spoil the movie, I will say I’m curious to see which direction Chelsea’s story goes. If Hallmark decided to expand Cut, Color, Murder beyond the first chapter, I’m hoping the story is from Chelsea’s perspective, as her part of the story was more interesting that Ali’s.
Cut, Color, Murder poster created by Crown Media Family Networks and Hallmark Movies & Mysteries
What are your thoughts on my list? Which Hallmark movies do you wish received a sequel? Please tell me in the comment section below!
Recently, I’ve been referencing the newest Hallmark Movies & Mysteries title, True Justice: Family Ties; within my list of the top ten best movies I saw in 2023 and when I talked about CrimeTime: Freefall in a Word on the Street story. Because the mystery genre is the most popular one on my blog and since I haven’t reviewed a mystery film since last October, I chose True Justice: Family Ties as the first movie to review in 2024! The 2020s has, so far, not been a strong decade for Hallmark Movies & Mysteries. When it comes to their mystery programs, the network has produced more stand-alone films, leaving only two series to continue. But as I mentioned in my aforementioned Word on the Street story, the three new mystery films premiering on Hallmark Movies & Mysteries this year, so far, have potential to create a multi-story series. It should also be noted how each of these three movies seem to have their own unique identity, allowing them to stand out against one another. Could True Justice: Family Ties be the start of a new chapter for Hallmark Movies & Mysteries? Turn the page on this review to find out!
The acting: Katherine McNamara portrays the film’s protagonist, Casey. Throughout the movie, she tries to prove her brother, Marcus, was falsely accused of committing a murder. Even though Casey and Marcus shared only a few scenes together, both Katherine and Sam Ashe Arnold, the actor who portrayed Marcus, sold the idea their characters were siblings who truly cared about one another! In the scenes where Casey visits Marcus in prison, there is very present fear in Marcus’ eyes. You can even hear concern and uncertainty in his voice. While in prison, Marcus seems shaken up due to his surroundings. Meanwhile, the tears Casey sheds for her brother appear genuine. She looks and sounds heartbroken by Marcus’ fate. Because of Sam and Katherine’s performance, I wish these characters shared more scenes together.
True Justice: Family Ties is about a team of characters who come together to solve the film’s mystery. In order for this idea to work, it’s important to cast a group of actors who will make that on-screen teamwork appear believable. That was achieved in this movie, as the friendship among the “Justice Warriors” felt genuine, showcasing the camaraderie between these characters! One example presents Sarah and Liam discussing their plans for the future and what inspired them to make certain choices in their life. With Sarah being a law school student and Liam having his own private investigation business, differences are set aside to show them forming a friendship and getting along well with each other. Because of Alexander Nunez’s charisma and Marisa McIntyre’s believable performance, I could honestly see their characters forming a romantic relationship if True Justice: Family Ties became a series!
Utilized talents and skills: As I previously mentioned in this review, True Justice: Family Ties is about a team of characters who come together to solve the film’s mystery. To create a story with a good team of characters, each character needs to receive an opportunity to utilize their respective skills and talents. This movie allows Casey and her friends to use their talents, skills, even their intern/business experiences to their advantage. Because each character brings something different to the table, every character plays a role in solving the case. Sarah is a law school student who is also an intern at a forensic office. She is able to utilize her knowledge of the law and her internship to find fingerprints and rule out suspects. This was a great way to make Sarah a valued member of the “Justice Warriors”!
A unique perspective: A decade ago, Hallmark created the Darrow & Darrow mystery series. In that series, the characters solved mysteries by approaching each case from a legal perspective. If someone were to only read the synopsis of True Justice: Family Ties after watching Darrow & Darrow, they would wonder what the difference between these two titles are. Casey and her friends are law school students in True Justice: Family Ties. The only exception is Liam, as he has his own private investigation business. The overarching story in the Darrow & Darrow series primarily revolves around Claire Darrow and Miles Strasberg. As I mentioned in this review, the story of True Justice: Family Ties focuses on a group of characters instead of just the male and female protagonist. These creative differences allow the 2024 mystery film to adopt an identity that sets it apart from its predecessors and other current mystery titles!
Law school textbooks image created by Peter Skadberg at freeimages.com. “FreeImages.com/Peter Skadberg.”
What I didn’t like about the film:
Situations happening too quickly: Fans of the mystery series from Hallmark Movies & Mysteries will know that solving a mystery is a process. This process involves multiple steps, with these steps broken down to allow the audience to solve the mystery alongside the protagonist(s). In True Justice: Family Ties, however, situations happened too quickly. From discovering suspects to finding clues, these steps were sped up, making the mystery solving less interactive. Even the reveal of the guilty party happened so fast within the film’s last ten minutes.
Weak on-screen chemistry: In most of Hallmark Movies & Mysteries’ mystery series, the main male and female protagonist will form a romantic relationship over the course of the series. Sometimes, the foundation of that relationship will be set up in a series’ first film. If True Justice: Family Ties becomes a series, it is assumed Eli and Casey will become the main romantic couple. But, in my opinion, Katherine McNamara and Markian Tarasiuk did not have strong on-screen chemistry. This is because their characters went back and forth between disliking each other and being friends. I recognize the screenwriters were attempting to incorporate the ‘enemies to lovers’ trope into the story. But in True Justice: Family Ties, that trope was not effective.
A random romance: Nikki Deloach and Benjamin Ayres star in True Justice: Family Ties as Professor Ambrose and D.A. Quinn. When returning to class to retrieve her notebook, Casey discovers Professor Ambrose and D.A. Quinn are sharing a romantic relationship. To me, this part of the story was random. That is because a) prior to that scene, there was no indication these characters even knew each other and b) these characters appeared in only a handful of scenes. Maybe if D.A. Quinn and Professor Ambrose had been given their own subplot where they built their relationship over time, their romance wouldn’t seem so sudden.
As of the release of this review, two other mystery films are scheduled to premiere on Hallmark Movies & Mysteries; Gilded Newport Mysteries: Murder at the Breakers and CrimeTime: Freefall. These movies, including True Justice: Family Ties, have potential to spark a multi-story series while boasting distinct identities. Even though it’s too early to determine what is in store for these titles, I can share my thoughts on True Justice: Family Ties! The first film to be released on Hallmark Movies & Mysteries this year was, in my opinion, just ok. The mystery wasn’t interactive enough for the audience because situations happened too quickly. Not only was D.A. Quinn and Professor Ambrose’s romance random, Katherine McNamara and Markian Tarasiuk’s on-screen chemistry was weak due to the screenwriting. However, the movie did have its strengths, such as the acting performances and how each character was able to utilize their skills and talents. It was also nice to see a story focus on a group of characters, providing a different type of story for Hallmark’s collection of mystery titles. At the end of the year, it’ll be interesting to see how True Justice: Family Ties compares to Hallmark’s other 2024 released movies!
Overall score: 6 out of 10
Have you seen True Justice: Family Ties? Are you excited for Hallmark’s other mystery movies? Please tell me in the comment section below!
18 Cinema Lane 