Back in March, I reviewed 1925’s The Phantom of the Opera in honor of the film’s one hundredth anniversary. But this is not the only movie celebrating this particular milestone. When I discovered Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ was also turning one hundred this year, I wanted to write about the film on 18 Cinema Lane. With “Silent Films” the theme of September’s Genre Grandeur, I found a good reason to check out this movie! Another reason why I wanted to write about Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ is because of how much I liked 1959’s Ben-Hur. I reviewed this version in 2019, which I ended up really liking. It was not only covered in a Blog Follower Dedication Review, it was also included on my list of ten classic movies I watched because of my blog. So, how does the original compare to the remake? Keep reading to find out!
Things I liked about the film:
The acting: Actors in silent films are forced to rely on the physical appearance of their performance. This means they must utilize body language, facial expressions, and emotions to express what their characters are thinking and feeling. As I write this review, it’s difficult for me to choose a favorite performance in Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ. Each portrayal was so captivating, watching this movie was an engaging experience! When Judah Ben-Hur is sharing drinks with Messala, he displays a relaxed smile and sits in a comfortable position, believing Messala has his best interests at heart. But after learning he and Messala can no longer put their differences aside, Judah quickly becomes saddened by this reality. His eyes express the pain of losing a friend. He also adopts a slight frown, wondering why his friend would change. Because Ramon Novarro’s performance was so strong, it was able to speak where dialogue couldn’t.
In Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ, May McAvoy portrays Esther, the daughter of Simonides. What I loved about her performance was how expressive it was! During a conversation with her father, Esther learns some shocking information. Her eyes become wide as a horrified expression is painted on her face. The more information she learns, the more shocked Esther appears. This consistent portrayal shows concern on her face as well. Similar to what I said about Ramon Novarro’s performance, May’s performance said so much while saying so little.
Color coded film: When I reviewed 1925’s The Phantom of the Opera, I talked about how much I liked the movie’s color coded film. Color coding this presentation gave each part of the story its own distinct significance. Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ utilizes color coded film as well. The way the film-making technique was incorporated into the movie signified the time of day in the story. Parts of The Nativity were shown in blue tinted film, indicating these parts were set at night. Jerusalem is covered in a light-yellow tinted film, meaning Judah and Esther first meet in the daytime. Most of the scenes that were fully in color depicted Biblical events. The creative team behind Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ used color coded film in very clever and visually interesting ways!
The scope: “Sword and sandal” films have been known for large set pieces and presenting them in grand ways. This was accomplished in Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ through the use of long and medium shots. Through the streets of Jerusalem, soldiers from various countries march together in a parade. Some long shots show off a massive stone structure that makes the people look like toy figurines. Both long and medium shots capture the magnitude of the crowds, emphasizing how many people came to see the spectacle. There were even shots that showed each group of soldiers, presenting how the groups were great in size. Because of the cinematography, Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ looked and felt larger than life!
The title cards: A staple of silent films is the inclusion of title cards. Without the use of dialogue, these title cards feature conversations between characters and describe what was happening in the story. But what impressed me about the title cards in Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ is how some of them were written. Reflecting on his conversation with Messala, an accompanying title card shares Judah’s thoughts and states “In outward seeming you are the same. But in spirit – you are a stranger”. In my opinion, this was an eloquent way of stating how Messala has changed. Later in the film, Judah proclaims “I am revenged indeed, but to what profit!” This quote on the title card addresses how, to Judah, success isn’t everything. These are just two examples of how this aspect of Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ went above and beyond!
What I didn’t like about the film:
The randomness of Iras: Within the second half of Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ, the movie introduces a character named Iras. While I liked Carmel Myers’ performance, I found Iras’ inclusion in the story random. The film establishes she is in a romantic relationship with Messala. But this relationship doesn’t really lead anywhere, as these two characters only share one scene together. A scene later, Iras flirts with Judah. Even though he is initially attracted to Iras, Judah pursues his feelings for Esther. Looking back on Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ, I wonder what Iras’ significance in the story was supposed to be? Was she intended to represent temptation or did she originally have a bigger role in the film, only for some of her scenes to be left on the cutting room floor?
The downplaying of Christianity/faith: I talked about liking the incorporation of Christianity/faith when I reviewed 1959’s Ben-Hur. In that review, I discuss how certain Biblical events were included into the overall story and how faith affected the characters and their actions. There were Biblical events depicted in 1925’s Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ as well. But unlike the 1959 movie, Christianity/faith was more downplayed in the 1925 film. The story places emphasis on Judah’s quest for revenge instead of how faith guided his life. From what I remember, Balthasar (one of The Three Wise Men) plays a greater role in the 1959 movie. This creative decision was, in my opinion, disappointing, especially since Ben-Hur is one of the better faith-based films.
My overall impression:
When it comes to cinema, a lot can happen in one hundred years. Trends come and go, technology changes, and color film becomes commonly used. But in those one hundred years, there are movies that stood the test of time. They achieved this by bringing something new to the table, finding their audience, or being at the right place at the right time. Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ from 1925 is one of these movies. It showed what “sword and sandal” films could and should be. Through cinematography, the scope of the project created a world that feels larger than life. The way some of the film’s title cards were written went above and beyond, showing how Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ’s creative team put thought and effort into their presentation. Though the movie has more flaws than its 1959 remake, the 1925 movie is a solid silent film! It was entertaining and engaging, due to the strengths of the project, like the acting and how color coded film was used. I’m also incredibly grateful for the restoration and preservation efforts made for Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ, especially since silent films have become less common in these one hundred years.
Overall score: 8.1-8.2 out of 10
Have you seen 1925’s Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ? Which silent films would you like to check out? Please tell me in the comment section!
Have fun at the movies!
Sally Silverscreen
18 Cinema Lane 