Tag: Diagnosis Murder

Sally Watches…Diagnosis Murder (The Sequel)!

On By 18cinemalane5 Comments

From time to time, I have accepted movie recommendations from my readers. Some of these recommendations were chosen for past reviews, such as when Jillian (from The Classic Film Connection) suggested I check out Fried Green Tomatoes. But on a few occasions, I have taken television show recommendations. After Jillian gave me another suggestion; the Diagnosis Murder episode, “Guardian Angel”, I was waiting for the right time to finally write about it. Remembering the show starred Dick and Barry Van Dyke, I decided to review the episode for Taking Up Room’s We Are Family Blogathon! As the title of this review suggests, this is not the first time I’ve written about an episode of Diagnosis Murder. Back in 2022, I reviewed the 1998 episode, “An Education in Murder”. While I found that episode to be just fine, I was willing to watch more episodes of the show with an open mind. Did I like “Guardian Angel” more than “An Education in Murder”? To solve this mystery, you have to read my review!

Episode Name: Guardian Angel

Season 1, Episode 14

Premiere Date: April 1st, 1994

The title card for “Guardian Angel”. Screenshot taken by me, Sally Silverscreen.

What I liked about this episode:

On television shows or in movies, there is sometimes that one performance that is so strong, it carries the entire production. That kind of performance came from Catherine Hicks in “Guardian Angel”! Portraying the murder victim’s wife, Lauren, Catherine brought emotional variety to her role. This versatility allowed Catherine to adapt to any situation her character was experiencing. In a scene showing Dr. Mark Sloan paying Lauren a visit at her house, Lauren shares a personal story with Dr. Sloan. As she tells her story, Lauren’s expressions and emotions fluctuate, helping to make Lauren’s reflection come across as realistic. The aforementioned emotional variety and adaptability made Catherine’s performance captivating to watch! I honestly wish she had been, at least, nominated for her role in this episode.

What I didn’t like about this episode:

Toward the beginning of “Guardian Angel”, it is revealed Lauren knows a man named Strand. She not only calls him in the middle of the night, she also visits his apartment. As I watched “Guardian Angel”, I was waiting for an explanation about Strand and Lauren’s connection. Unfortunately, this explanation never came. Is Strand Lauren’s son from a previous relationship? Perhaps Strand is an undercover journalist working for Lauren’s husband’s political opponent? These unanswered questions left a hole in the episode’s plot. Not relating Lauren and Strand’s connection to the main conflict was also a missed opportunity. As of the publication of this review, the mystery of how Strand and Lauren know each other is still unsolved.

The mystery itself:

The mystery in “Guardian Angel” and “An Education in Murder” share two major similarities. The first is how the audience learns early in the story who the guilty party is. The second is how the audience is forced to just watch Dr. Mark Sloan figure out the mystery’s culprit. This approach to story-telling takes away the interactivity of solving the mystery alongside the protagonist. How Dr. Mark Sloan reached certain conclusions in “Guardian Angel” was a bit far-fetched. For these conclusions, the bridge between point A and B was missing. It also doesn’t help how there were few physical clues.

The We Are Family Blogathon banner created by Rebecca from Taking Up Room

The other factors from this episode:

  • Earlier in this review, I mentioned how Lauren called Strand in the middle of the night. During this phone call, however, Lauren poses as a newspaper reporter. “Guardian Angel” establishes how Strand is obsessed with Lauren’s family. Not only does Strand have a collage of pictures and newspaper articles on his apartment wall, he also attends events Lauren and her husband were either invited to or hosting. With that said, I find it hard to believe Strand wouldn’t recognize Lauren’s voice during the aforementioned phone call, especially since Lauren wasn’t trying to disguise her voice.
  • I haven’t seen many episodes of Diagnosis Murder. But based on the episodes I have seen, I’ve noticed how Dr. Mark Sloan treats people fairly. In “Guardian Angel”, a man named Lewis was admitted into the hospital due to being hit by a car. Dr. Mark Sloan tells Lewis how he treats patients, not charity cases, at his hospital. After learning Lewis only has about five hundred dollars to his name, Dr. Mark Sloan advocates for Lewis to be registered into a “senior program”.
  • When I reviewed “An Education in Murder”, I wondered how often younger characters appeared on Diagnosis Murder. While I still don’t have the answer to that question, I think it’s an interesting coincidence how I’m reviewing another episode where Dr. Mark Sloan provides guidance to a younger character. Lauren has a teenage daughter named Melissa. When Dr. Mark Sloan discovers Melissa received an eating disorder diagnosis, he pays her a visit at a nearby hospital. During this visit, Dr. Mark Sloan breaks the ice by discussing music with Melissa. He also learns why she was diagnosed with an eating disorder. Dr. Mark Sloan’s willingness to mentor younger characters makes me believe he missed his calling as a teacher.
  • In some of my Murder, She Wrote episode reviews, I marveled over the set design and locations featured on the show. These places were so visually appealing, they became showstoppers in their respective episodes. It looks like “Guardian Angel” took a page from Murder, She Wrote’s playbook when it came to location scouting! I don’t know if Lauren’s house is a set or a real-life structure. However, this house was one of the most photogenic facilities I’ve ever seen on a television show! The exterior of the house boasted brick and deep brown wood. Details such as arched windows and small steepled roofs present a cozy, cottage-like appearance to this building. The interior of Lauren’s house is equally photogenic! Though only two rooms were shown in “Guardian Angel”, they looked like they came straight out of a castle. In the living room, the focal point is an impressive dark wood and marble fireplace, complete with carved designs just under the mantle. Meanwhile, the large dining room displays a cozy elegance. This aesthetic is made possible by combining printed cream curtains, a gold chandelier, and a large brick and wood fireplace.
This is the episode’s only clear shot of the exterior of Lauren’s house. Despite that, Lauren’s house displays an elegant, cottage-like appearance. Screenshot taken by me, Sally Silverscreen.
Though it can be difficult to decipher the carvings on the fireplace, the carvings add to the fireplace’s impressiveness. Screenshot taken by me, Sally Silverscreen.
Even though Dr. Mark Sloan and Lauren spend only one scene in the dining room, the space itself boasts a sophisticated, yet quaint style. Screenshot taken by me, Sally Silverscreen.

My overall thoughts:

Two years ago, when I shared my overall thoughts on “An Education in Murder”, I said the amount of stories in that episode never felt overwhelming. I also said each plot was connected to the mystery. These same claims cannot be made about “Guardian Angel”. In the 1994 episode, there is so much happening in the story, certain parts are either not clearly explained or not explained at all. As I mentioned in this review, the connection between Strand and Lauren was never revealed. What is also not revealed is why Strand was obsessed with Lauren’s family. “Guardian Angel” is another mystery where the audience discovers who the guilty party is early in the episode. It’s also another mystery where the audience simply watches Dr. Mark Sloan solving the case. But for all the faults of this Diagnosis Murder episode, there were aspects of the episode I liked. One of these aspects was Catherine Hicks’ portrayal of Lauren. “Guardian Angel” is not one of the worst episodes reviewed on 18 Cinema Lane. Similar to “An Education in Murder”, though, I was left desiring more.

Rating: A 3.2 out of 5

Have fun in Los Angeles!

Sally Silverscreen

Sally Watches…Diagnosis Murder!

On By 18cinemalane9 Comments

For the We Love Detectives Week Blogathon, I was originally going to create a tier rank list of every film from Hallmark Movies & Mysteries I’ve seen. But the more I thought about this idea, the more ambitious it became. Instead of following through on such a daunting task, I decided to submit an entry that was simpler in nature. I’m currently reading The Magician’s Accomplice by Michael Genelin. But I might not finish the book within the blogathon timeframe. So that’s how I came up with my back-up plan! Recently, while on Hallmark Movies & Mysteries’ website, I came across an episode of Diagnosis Murder titled “An Education in Murder”. What caught my attention was the episode’s synopsis, as it reminded me of an episode of Murder, She Wrote I reviewed back in 2019: “School for Murder”. Curious to see how similar or different “An Education in Murder” was to “School for Murder”, I thought now would be a good time to introduce myself to a “new” mystery show! Before I continue with my review, I’d like to point out the irony of the situation. That aforementioned review of “School for Murder” was not only the first time I had watched Murder, She Wrote, but that was my submission for a mystery themed blogathon!

Episode Name: An Education in Murder

Season 5, Episode 19

Premiere Date: March 5th, 1998

The title card for “An Education in Murder”. Screenshot taken by me, Sally Silverscreen.

What I liked about this episode:

I was impressed by the acting in “An Education in Murder”! But there was one performance that really outshined the rest. Portraying a student named Noelle, Danielle Harris did such a great job with the acting material given! When it comes to describing her character, think Cher from Clueless but more manipulative. There were two sides to Noelle; the sweet, good-natured side she used to give a good first impression and the edgy, sadistic side that causes her fellow classmates to face a living nightmare. Throughout this episode, Danielle effortlessly wove in between these polar opposites, changing her character’s demeanor like a chameleon. It was also interesting to see Noelle interact with the other characters, her unpredictability leaving me wondering what she’ll do next. Danielle’s strong acting talents worked in her favor, as she helped bring to life one of the most memorable characters I’ve seen in any tv show!

What I didn’t like about this episode:

Similar to “School for Murder”, “An Education in Murder” took place at an affluent private school. Kelly, one of the students of the school, explains to Dr. Mark Sloan, the show’s protagonist, just how affluent the student body is. After class, she says that if a student doesn’t keep up with current events, their GPA will suffer. She also tells Mark how she doesn’t have a wealthy father. Despite these words, Norrington Hall, the school featured in this episode, didn’t feel like an affluent private school. I know there are a variety of private schools with their own unique communities, traditions, and ways of operating on a day-to-day basis. But I couldn’t find anything about Norrington Hall that screamed “look how much money can be dumped into a child’s education”. For one, all the students in this episode didn’t behave or interact any differently from public school students in a typical movie or television show. Mark’s science class at Norrington Hall seems like a standard AP (advanced placement) science class. Sure, the school’s interior and exterior had a nice appearance. But if entertainment media and real-life have taught me anything, public school buildings can look just as nice as those belonging to private schools. The way the characters’ words didn’t match up with the visuals reminded me of Chippewa Falls Library from the Hallmark Christmas movie, Holly and Ivy.

The reason I included this screenshot is to show readers how nice the interior of Norrington Hall is. Screenshot taken by me, Sally Silverscreen.

The mystery itself:

I’m glad “An Education in Murder” wasn’t a carbon-copy of “School for Murder”! Even though the Diagnosis Murder episode had a main plot and two subplots, similar to Murder, She Wrote’s episode, the story felt unique from the predecessor. Despite having three stories in one episode, it never seemed overwhelming. Each of these plots held a connection to the mystery. Unfortunately, that mystery was so painfully obvious, you might as well place the guilty party under the brightest neon sign you can find. Because of the mystery’s painful obviousness, the resolution was anti-climactic. This led to a weak mystery.  While watching “An Education in Murder”, I was hoping the guilty party was a red herring, with an unexpected twist hiding around the corner. Sadly, this episode was “cut-and-dry”, leaving little room for intrigue.

The other factors from this episode:

  • “An Education in Murder” brought up several messages relating to medicine and murder mysteries I hadn’t thought of before. For instance, after a classmate from Norrington Hall passes away, Mark tells his students how that student’s death is going to make a difference. As morbid as that sounds, he brings up a good point about murder mysteries. Because we, the audience, are so caught up in the story, the murder mystery’s effect on the characters and their surroundings can sometimes be overlooked. This can, to an extent, also be said about real-life cases.
  • At certain points in the episode, Mark gives Kelly advice, ranging from how to prevent dizzy spells to figuring out her life after high school. He helps her in an attempt to provide a trustworthy figure in Kelly’s life. This served as a major difference between Diagnosis Murder and Murder, She Wrote. Out of the episodes of Murder, She Wrote I’ve seen, I don’t recall Jessica Fletcher giving noteworthy advice to younger characters. Maybe the infrequent presence of younger characters on that show was a reason why? Even though this is my first time watching Diagnosis Murder, it makes me wonder how often younger characters appeared on the show.
  • In one scene, Mark’s son, Steve, gives Mark information about the guilty party’s background. This information was used to explain the motive behind the guilty party’s behavior. After hearing this explanation, it made me wonder if the show was implying the guilty party had RAD (reactive attachment disorder)? I’m not asking this to diagnose a character, but simply out of curiosity. If the guilty party did have RAD, why wouldn’t any of the characters mention this? I know this show doesn’t revolve around the psychological aspect of the medical world. Still, I’m surprised the disorder wasn’t openly stated in this episode.

My overall thoughts:

For my first time watching Diagnosis Murder, I was left desiring more from the mystery. Even though it was a different story from Murder, She Wrote’s “School for Murder”, it was painfully obvious who the guilty party was. Because of that, I didn’t find the mystery interactive. However, the parts of the story surrounding the mystery made up for the episode’s weaknesses! “An Education in Murder” was more thought-provoking than I expected, sharing interesting ideas about murder mysteries and medicine. Each plot was connected to the mystery, allowing these stories to share importance in the script. But, as I said in the review, the amount of stories never felt overwhelming. Based on the series synopsis I read on Hallmark Movies & Mysteries’ website, it seems like Diagnosis Murder wanted to enjoy the fruits of Murder, She Wrote’s labor. I came to this conclusion because each show shares some common aspects, such as featuring an older protagonist. Like with Murder, She Wrote, I might check out more episodes from Diagnosis Murder.

Rating: A 3.5 out of 5

We Love Detectives Week Blogathon banner created by Hamlette from Hamlette’s Soliloquy

Have fun in Malibu!

Sally Silverscreen