Six years ago, when 18 Cinema Lane was born, I never imagined my blog would receive five hundred followers. But because of these followers, the people who took the time to read what I had to say, this milestone became a reality! To express my gratitude, I’m, once again, thanking my blog’s followers by writing this Blog Follower Dedication Review. This time, however, I’m presenting this review in the style of an open letter to the chosen film. While visiting the blog, It’s a Wonderful Movie, I came across a post about the 2022 Christmas movie, I Heard the Bells. At first, I believed it was a new production from Great American Family. This belief piqued my interest, as I wanted to review one of the network’s Christmas films. Then, I discovered I Heard the Bells was, simply, airing on Great American Family. Instead of being deterred by this misunderstanding, I still selected the 2022 picture for my Blog Follower Dedication Review, as I never heard of this presentation before 2024. With the Christmas season in full swing, writing about I Heard the Bells felt like an appropriate choice. So, without further ado, let’s begin this open letter!
An open letter to I Heard the Bells:
As I write this letter, you remind me of another Christmas movie I know; Christmas on Division Street. That’s because you and the 1991 television film share one thing in common; meeting me by chance. If you hadn’t been featured on It’s a Wonderful Movie, I would never had heard about you. Then again, if I had paid closer attention, I would have known sooner you weren’t a Great American Family production. Despite that misunderstanding on my part, I still wanted to give you a fair chance. When it comes to writing about Christmas pictures, I root for every movie, including you, to be good. And that’s exactly what you are; good! With the seasonal entertainment landscape saturated with the same cliches, aesthetics, and story ideas, a Christmas movie needs to find a way to stand out from the competition. You, I Heard the Bells, succeeded in doing that!
In RKO 281 and Amadeus, Liev Schreiber and Tom Hulce brought humanity back to the names of Orson Welles and Amadeus. They also found the heart of the “genius” and put some genuine emotion behind it. Through his portrayal of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Stephen Atherholt followed in Liev and Tom’s footsteps. When it came to Stephen’s performance, however, he brought an emotional fire that helped make Henry a lively, well-rounded individual! Toward the beginning of the story, just hours before Christmas, Henry recites a poem. Combining facial expressions, vocal inflections, and body language, Henry was animated and captivating. He also spoke in a very poetic way, fitting for a man who had a way with words. Later in the story, after Henry experiences a tragedy, he gets into an argument with his son, Charley. At first, his eyes are downcast and he speaks in a softer tone, trying to avoid a conflict. But as Charley’s side of the argument becomes heated, Henry suddenly bursts with emotion. He quickly bolts from his seat and yells at his son, his anger spilling over. This reaction is so unexpected, Henry’s other children appear frightened.
Through on-screen text, you made it known you were based on a true story. However, I still wish Stephen Atherholt and Rachel Day Hughes shared more scenes together. I already talked about Stephen’s portrayal of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, explaining why it was good. Acting alongside Rachel, who portrayed Fanny Longfellow, Stephen shared strong on-screen chemistry with her! One of my favorite scenes is when Fanny and Henry dance together on Christmas. Their gentle waltz perfectly captures their romantic tenderness. Even in scenes taking place outside of Christmastime, this romantic tenderness was present between Henry and Fanny. At a dinner party, Henry is nervous about having his poetry recited in front of the party guests. During the poem’s introduction, Henry’s hand twitches. Fanny quickly puts her hand over his and even encourages him to lift up his eyes. Throughout this scene, Fanny’s encouragement is gentle, with her patience and kindness making Henry feel more comfortable in his situation. Though Rachel and Stephen shared only a few scenes together, they effectively showed how Fanny and Henry brought out the best in each other!
Bringing up RKO 281 and Amadeus again, these movies are historical pictures where attention to detail made their respective worlds feel visually immersive. It seems like you took another page out of Amadeus and RKO 281’s playbook by applying that attention to detail to Henry’s world! Watching this story unfold felt like traveling in time to the early 1860s. Whether it was the Civil War uniforms, the set design, or even a kite, every piece of this production appeared to be well-researched by your creative team. Remember when I brought up Henry reciting a poem hours before Christmas and the waltz between Henry and Fanny on Christmas? Those moments took place in the Longfellow home’s main sitting room, where era appropriate Christmas decorations can be seen. I noticed orange slices entwined on the garland above the fireplace, as well as candles illuminating the room. I even saw a Nativity set on a nearby table.
While there was a lot to like about you, there were some things I didn’t like about you. One of them was how you were almost two hours long. I know you’re a fan of establishing shots, but did you really need that many? Personally, I think you could have either cut some of these shots or trimmed the establishing shots’ length. As I mentioned earlier in this letter, Henry experiences a tragedy. This event causes his appearance to change as time goes on. Even Charley’s hair looks different over time. Yet Henry’s daughters, Anne, Alice, and Edith, always looked the same despite the progression of years. For this flaw, I fault the director and casting director, as they should have been more mindful about how those in the story were presented. Speaking of those involved in the story, there are some people I wish were more involved in what was happening on-screen. Senator Charles Sumner, portrayed by Daniel Stargel, is one of Henry’s supporters. He even helps Charley find a respectable position in the military. But out of your almost two-hour story, Charles appears in only a handful of scenes. I remember how you’re based on a true story. However, that’s not going to change my mind on how Charles should have been given more appearances.
Do you remember at the beginning of this letter, when I said you reminded me of Christmas on Division Street? Well, there’s another Christmas movie you remind me of. That would be the classic It’s a Wonderful Life! For starters, you and the 1946 film are Christmas productions that are about more than just the Christmas holiday. Both of you focus on a man and his story, also exploring how that man’s relationships affect his existence. There’re also elements of faith in both stories. However, these elements are incorporated in different ways. Your delivery, as well as that of It’s a Wonderful Life, shows how much you cared about the overall presentation. In your case, your emphasis on attention to detail made the story look and feel so historically accurate, Henry’s world became immersive! Every acting performance was strong, especially Stephen’s and Rachel’s. Yes, you do have flaws. But I don’t think they will hold you back from, one day, becoming a classic! When I wrote about RKO 281 last year, I claimed good films leave a lasting impression. As I close this letter and move along on my blogging journey, I can honestly say you’ve done just that!
Sincerely,
Sally Silverscreen
P.S. I’ll give you a score of 7.6 out of 10.
18 Cinema Lane 